Comparison between human umbilical artery and rabbit abdominal aorta as substrata for platelet adhesion and platelet thrombus formation under flow conditions.

Blood vessels Pub Date : 1991-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000158898
G Escolar, M Garrido, J Aznar-Salatti, A Ordinas, E Bastida
{"title":"Comparison between human umbilical artery and rabbit abdominal aorta as substrata for platelet adhesion and platelet thrombus formation under flow conditions.","authors":"G Escolar,&nbsp;M Garrido,&nbsp;J Aznar-Salatti,&nbsp;A Ordinas,&nbsp;E Bastida","doi":"10.1159/000158898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rabbit abdominal aortas and human umbilical arteries are currently used as substrata for the study of platelet adhesion and aggregate formation under flow conditions. Using immunohistochemical and ultrastructural methods, we have analyzed both vessel surfaces. The reactivity towards platelets of the subendothelium (SE) exposed on these vessels after mechanical or enzymatic digestion (alpha-chymotrypsin) was morphometrically quantified and the nature of the interaction studied in the electron microscope. After mechanical damage, the ultrastructural study of rabbit aortas showed a clearly defined internal elastic lamina (IEL). In contrast, umbilical vessels lacked a consistent IEL and masses of amorphous material often located deeper in the media were the main constitutents of the SE. Immunohistochemical labeling of the von Willebrand factor bound to both types of vessel differed considerably. Quantification of platelet interactions after perfusion of citrated blood showed qualitative differences between mechanically damaged rabbit or human vessels. Enzymatic digestion produced a more thrombogenic surface on rabbit aortas (p less than 0.01 vs. nondigested), but decreased their reactivity towards platelets on umbilical arteries (p less than 0.01 vs. nondigested). The ultrastructural study of the interacting platelets revealed that aggregates, when present, were found on the extracellular matrix underlying endothelial cells of rabbit aortas, but interacting with fibrillar structures probably derived from cell elements of the media in the case of umbilical arteries. These findings indicate that rabbit aortas and umbilical arteries possess structural characteristics that result in different thrombogenic properties with respect to circulating platelets.</p>","PeriodicalId":9009,"journal":{"name":"Blood vessels","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000158898","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood vessels","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000158898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Rabbit abdominal aortas and human umbilical arteries are currently used as substrata for the study of platelet adhesion and aggregate formation under flow conditions. Using immunohistochemical and ultrastructural methods, we have analyzed both vessel surfaces. The reactivity towards platelets of the subendothelium (SE) exposed on these vessels after mechanical or enzymatic digestion (alpha-chymotrypsin) was morphometrically quantified and the nature of the interaction studied in the electron microscope. After mechanical damage, the ultrastructural study of rabbit aortas showed a clearly defined internal elastic lamina (IEL). In contrast, umbilical vessels lacked a consistent IEL and masses of amorphous material often located deeper in the media were the main constitutents of the SE. Immunohistochemical labeling of the von Willebrand factor bound to both types of vessel differed considerably. Quantification of platelet interactions after perfusion of citrated blood showed qualitative differences between mechanically damaged rabbit or human vessels. Enzymatic digestion produced a more thrombogenic surface on rabbit aortas (p less than 0.01 vs. nondigested), but decreased their reactivity towards platelets on umbilical arteries (p less than 0.01 vs. nondigested). The ultrastructural study of the interacting platelets revealed that aggregates, when present, were found on the extracellular matrix underlying endothelial cells of rabbit aortas, but interacting with fibrillar structures probably derived from cell elements of the media in the case of umbilical arteries. These findings indicate that rabbit aortas and umbilical arteries possess structural characteristics that result in different thrombogenic properties with respect to circulating platelets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血流条件下人脐动脉与兔腹主动脉作为血小板黏附和血小板血栓形成基质的比较。
目前,兔腹主动脉和人脐动脉被用作研究血小板在流动条件下粘附和聚集形成的基质。使用免疫组织化学和超微结构方法,我们分析了两个血管表面。在机械或酶促消化(α -胰凝乳酶)后,暴露在这些血管上的内皮下层(SE)对血小板的反应性进行了形态计量量化,并在电子显微镜下研究了相互作用的性质。机械损伤后,兔主动脉超微结构显示清晰的内弹性层(IEL)。相比之下,脐带血管缺乏一致的IEL,并且通常位于介质深处的无定形物质团块是SE的主要成分。两种血管结合的血管性血友病因子的免疫组织化学标记有很大差异。柠檬酸血灌注后血小板相互作用的定量显示机械损伤兔血管与人血管的定性差异。酶消化在兔主动脉上产生了更多的血栓形成表面(p小于0.01),但降低了它们对脐带动脉血小板的反应性(p小于0.01)。相互作用血小板的超微结构研究显示,当存在聚集体时,在兔主动脉内皮细胞下的细胞外基质上发现,但在脐带动脉的情况下,与纤维结构相互作用可能来自介质的细胞成分。这些发现表明,兔主动脉和脐带动脉具有结构特征,导致循环血小板的不同血栓形成特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contractile and morphologic properties of a saphenous vein after 12 years as an aortocoronary bypass graft. Effect of H-8, an isoquinolinesulfonamide inhibitor of cyclic nucleotide-dependent protein kinase, on cAMP- and cGMP-mediated vasorelaxation. Hemorheological effects of buflomedil: action on shape and functions of the human neutrophils. Norepinephrine, phentolamine and buflomedil influence on arteriolar vasomotion in the hamster skinfold preparation. Heme-dependent activation of guanylate cyclase by nitric oxide: a novel signal transduction mechanism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1