Challenges in Evaluation in Education and Guidance: A Perspective from 2020

M. Rodríguez-Conde, S. Olmos-Migueláñez, Adriana Gamazo, José Carlos Sánchez Prieto, J. O’Hara
{"title":"Challenges in Evaluation in Education and Guidance: A Perspective from 2020","authors":"M. Rodríguez-Conde, S. Olmos-Migueláñez, Adriana Gamazo, José Carlos Sánchez Prieto, J. O’Hara","doi":"10.1145/3434780.3436715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Last year, the “Evaluation in Education and Guidance” track was celebrated in León during the seventh edition of TEEM. This year, the conference returns to Salamanca with a new format; an online conference consisting of different activities such as keynote speakers, round tables and debates. As in previous editions, the papers presented to the Evaluation in Education and Guidance track have reflected on the current challenges of educational assessment, revolving mainly around two topics: student assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic and competence assessment in higher education. The authors explained the main findings and conclusions of their papers through publicly available video presentations, and the Chairs organized a Delphi-based debate activity in order to collectively reflect on the two aforementioned topics. To that end, the Chairs prepared an open-ended questionnaire consisting of nine questions so that the authors could express their opinions. Then, a live session ensued in which the Chairs explained the different points of view on each issue and the authors debated them. This paper presents an overview of the papers submitted to the track, as well as a summary of the main conclusions that emerged from the questionnaire and the live session.","PeriodicalId":430095,"journal":{"name":"Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Last year, the “Evaluation in Education and Guidance” track was celebrated in León during the seventh edition of TEEM. This year, the conference returns to Salamanca with a new format; an online conference consisting of different activities such as keynote speakers, round tables and debates. As in previous editions, the papers presented to the Evaluation in Education and Guidance track have reflected on the current challenges of educational assessment, revolving mainly around two topics: student assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic and competence assessment in higher education. The authors explained the main findings and conclusions of their papers through publicly available video presentations, and the Chairs organized a Delphi-based debate activity in order to collectively reflect on the two aforementioned topics. To that end, the Chairs prepared an open-ended questionnaire consisting of nine questions so that the authors could express their opinions. Then, a live session ensued in which the Chairs explained the different points of view on each issue and the authors debated them. This paper presents an overview of the papers submitted to the track, as well as a summary of the main conclusions that emerged from the questionnaire and the live session.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育与指导评价面临的挑战:从2020年看
去年,在第七届TEEM期间,在León上庆祝了“教育和指导中的评估”专题。今年,会议以新的形式回到萨拉曼卡;由主题演讲、圆桌会议和辩论等不同活动组成的在线会议。与以前的版本一样,提交给教育评估和指导专题的论文反映了当前教育评估面临的挑战,主要围绕两个主题:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的学生评估和高等教育能力评估。作者通过公开的视频演示解释了他们论文的主要发现和结论,主席组织了一场基于德尔菲的辩论活动,以便集体反思上述两个主题。为此目的,主席们编写了一份由九个问题组成的不限成员名额的调查表,以便作者们表达他们的意见。然后是现场会议,主持人解释对每个问题的不同观点,作者就这些观点进行辩论。本文概述了提交给该轨道的论文,以及从问卷调查和现场会议中得出的主要结论的摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design of an auricular prosthesis for patients with grade III or IV microtia Gamifying Teacher Students’ Learning Platform: Information and Communication Technology in Teacher Education courses Learning Analytics: A Time to Shine Education for Sustainable Development and Climate Change: Pedagogical study of the social movement Fridays For Future Salamanca Validation of the K-Social-C questionnaire for measuring the Social Construction of Knowledge from Open Innovation in Social Innovation Laboratories: Instrument Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1