The Early Japanese Immigrant Quest for Citizenship: The Background of the 1922 Ozawa Case

Y. Ichioka
{"title":"The Early Japanese Immigrant Quest for Citizenship: The Background of the 1922 Ozawa Case","authors":"Y. Ichioka","doi":"10.17953/AMER.4.2.E0035T6268R34187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Denied the right of naturalization, Japanese immigrants were socalled “aliens ineligible to citizenship” for decades. In the noted case of Ozawa Takao, the United States Supreme Court upheld the ineligibility of the Japanese in a 1922 landmark decision that stood unchallenged until the McCarran Act of 1952 altered their legal status and finally admitted them into citizenship. The literature in English on the early history of the immigrants is one-sided.’ Principally devoted to the movement to exclude the Japanese from the United States in the first quarter of the twentieth century, it covers the origins, causes, and development of the exclusion movement and the adverse repercussions it had on United States-Japan relations. Highlighting the excluders rather than the excluded, the literature rarely touches on how the immigrants felt, thought, and reacted to being excluded. Slighting them, past studies give at best the false impression of their having been merely a victimized mass. Japanese immigrants were anything but passive victims; on the contrary, they actively fought the exclusion movement._As a part of their long and bitter struggle, they supported the Ozawa case in the","PeriodicalId":131349,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Immigrants and American Law","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Immigrants and American Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17953/AMER.4.2.E0035T6268R34187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Denied the right of naturalization, Japanese immigrants were socalled “aliens ineligible to citizenship” for decades. In the noted case of Ozawa Takao, the United States Supreme Court upheld the ineligibility of the Japanese in a 1922 landmark decision that stood unchallenged until the McCarran Act of 1952 altered their legal status and finally admitted them into citizenship. The literature in English on the early history of the immigrants is one-sided.’ Principally devoted to the movement to exclude the Japanese from the United States in the first quarter of the twentieth century, it covers the origins, causes, and development of the exclusion movement and the adverse repercussions it had on United States-Japan relations. Highlighting the excluders rather than the excluded, the literature rarely touches on how the immigrants felt, thought, and reacted to being excluded. Slighting them, past studies give at best the false impression of their having been merely a victimized mass. Japanese immigrants were anything but passive victims; on the contrary, they actively fought the exclusion movement._As a part of their long and bitter struggle, they supported the Ozawa case in the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期日本移民对公民身份的追求:1922年小泽案的背景
由于被剥夺了入籍的权利,几十年来,日本移民被称为“无资格入籍的外国人”。在著名的小泽一郎高雄案中,美国最高法院在1922年的一项具有里程碑意义的裁决中维持了日本人的无资格,直到1952年的麦卡伦法案改变了他们的法律地位,最终承认他们成为美国公民。英语文献对移民早期历史的描述是片面的。这本书主要讲述了20世纪前25年将日本人驱逐出美国的运动,涵盖了排华运动的起源、原因和发展,以及它对美日关系的不利影响。文学作品强调的是被排斥者,而不是被排斥者,很少涉及移民对被排斥的感受、想法和反应。过去的研究忽视了他们,最多给人一种错误的印象,认为他们只是一群受害者。日本移民绝不是被动的受害者;相反,他们积极反对排他运动。作为他们长期艰苦斗争的一部分,他们支持小泽案
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prelude to Prejudice: Hiram Johnson, Woodrow Wilson, and the California Alien Land Law Controversy of 1913 Constitutional Law: Equal Protection of the Laws: Presumption of Intent to Evade Escheat in California Alien Land Law. The Japanese Problem in Oregon * The California Alien Land Law and the Fourteenth Amendment Politics, Education, and Language Policy: The Case of Japanese Language Schools in Hawaii
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1