Reconstruction of Historical Data and Analysis on Three-dimensional Tourism Climate Resources in Fanjing Mountain Scenic Spot

X. Fang, W. Qiang, Du Zhengjing, Yang Chaomei
{"title":"Reconstruction of Historical Data and Analysis on Three-dimensional Tourism Climate Resources in Fanjing Mountain Scenic Spot","authors":"X. Fang, W. Qiang, Du Zhengjing, Yang Chaomei","doi":"10.1109/ICMO49322.2019.9025961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fanjing Mountain scenic spot with the highest altitude of 2572m, is a 5A level scenic spot in Guizhou Province and it belongs to Jiangkou county with the altitude of 362m. Due to the obvious difference in altitude, historical observation data of Jiangkou county can not well reflect the historical climate characteristics of Fanjing Mountain scenic spot.In this paper, a multiple regression model is established based on the observation elements of temperature, humidity, wind, rainfall and other automatic stations in Fanjing Mountain scenic spot and Jiangkou county on the same day from 2016 to 2018. The differences of temperature, humidity, wind etc. and tourism climate suitability between Fanjing Mountain scenic spot and Jiangkou county were analyzed. The results show: The simulation value of average temperature error between $\\pm 2^\\circ$ in regression model accounts for 70.8%, and the maximum temperature error is slightly higher,but they are better than the calculated values of temperature decline rate. The ratio of average relative humidity error within $\\pm 10\\%$ is 75.8%.The average maximum temperature in Fanjing Mountain of reconstruction historical data from 1980 to 2014 is 12.8${^\\circ}$, and the average annual temperature is 8.7 ${^\\circ}$, which is 8.4${^\\circ}$ and 7.7${^\\circ}$ lower than Jiangkou county respectively. They are about 5${^\\circ}$ higher than the calculated values of temperature decline rate.InJiangkou county, the average temperature and the maximum temperature in 35 years shows an upward trend, but the annual change trend of Fanjing Mountain temperature is not obvious. The annual average humidity (94%) and wind speed (4.8m/s) in Fanjing Mountain are higher than those of Jiangkou county (80.8% and 1.2m/s), and their annual change trend is consistent with that of Jiangkou county, showing a downward trend. The tourism climate suitability of Fanjing Mountain and Jiangkoucounty is analyzed comparatively. The winter tourism climate suitability of Jiangkou county is general, the rest months are suitable, and the tourism climate suitability index in July and August is lower than 70. However, Fanjing Mountain is suitable in summer, and its tourism climate suitability index is higher than 70, but its tourism suitability is poor from January to April and from October to December. The reconstruction of historical data of Fanjing Mountain scenic spot provides data support for the analysis of three-dimensional tourism climate resources and the development of summer tourism economy.","PeriodicalId":257532,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Meteorology Observations (ICMO)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Meteorology Observations (ICMO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMO49322.2019.9025961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Fanjing Mountain scenic spot with the highest altitude of 2572m, is a 5A level scenic spot in Guizhou Province and it belongs to Jiangkou county with the altitude of 362m. Due to the obvious difference in altitude, historical observation data of Jiangkou county can not well reflect the historical climate characteristics of Fanjing Mountain scenic spot.In this paper, a multiple regression model is established based on the observation elements of temperature, humidity, wind, rainfall and other automatic stations in Fanjing Mountain scenic spot and Jiangkou county on the same day from 2016 to 2018. The differences of temperature, humidity, wind etc. and tourism climate suitability between Fanjing Mountain scenic spot and Jiangkou county were analyzed. The results show: The simulation value of average temperature error between $\pm 2^\circ$ in regression model accounts for 70.8%, and the maximum temperature error is slightly higher,but they are better than the calculated values of temperature decline rate. The ratio of average relative humidity error within $\pm 10\%$ is 75.8%.The average maximum temperature in Fanjing Mountain of reconstruction historical data from 1980 to 2014 is 12.8${^\circ}$, and the average annual temperature is 8.7 ${^\circ}$, which is 8.4${^\circ}$ and 7.7${^\circ}$ lower than Jiangkou county respectively. They are about 5${^\circ}$ higher than the calculated values of temperature decline rate.InJiangkou county, the average temperature and the maximum temperature in 35 years shows an upward trend, but the annual change trend of Fanjing Mountain temperature is not obvious. The annual average humidity (94%) and wind speed (4.8m/s) in Fanjing Mountain are higher than those of Jiangkou county (80.8% and 1.2m/s), and their annual change trend is consistent with that of Jiangkou county, showing a downward trend. The tourism climate suitability of Fanjing Mountain and Jiangkoucounty is analyzed comparatively. The winter tourism climate suitability of Jiangkou county is general, the rest months are suitable, and the tourism climate suitability index in July and August is lower than 70. However, Fanjing Mountain is suitable in summer, and its tourism climate suitability index is higher than 70, but its tourism suitability is poor from January to April and from October to December. The reconstruction of historical data of Fanjing Mountain scenic spot provides data support for the analysis of three-dimensional tourism climate resources and the development of summer tourism economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
梵净山景区历史数据重建及三维旅游气候资源分析
梵净山风景区为贵州省5A级景区,海拔2572米,隶属于海拔362米的江口县。由于海拔差异明显,江口县的历史观测资料不能很好地反映梵净山景区的历史气候特征。本文基于2016 - 2018年梵净山景区和江口县当日气温、湿度、风、降雨等自动站观测要素,建立多元回归模型。分析了梵净山风景区与江口县的温度、湿度、风等特征及旅游气候适宜性的差异。结果表明:回归模型中平均温度误差在$\pm 2^\circ$之间的模拟值占70.8%,最大温度误差略高,但均优于温度递减率的计算值。平均相对湿度误差在$\pm 10\%$范围内的比例为75.8%。1980 ~ 2014年重建历史资料的范景山平均最高气温为12.8${^\circ}$,年平均气温为8.7 ${^\circ}$,分别比江口县低8.4${^\circ}$和7.7${^\circ}$。它们比温度下降率的计算值高约5${^\circ}$。江口县35 a平均气温和最高气温呈上升趋势,而梵净山气温的年变化趋势不明显。梵净山的年平均湿度(94%)和风速(4.8m/s)高于江口县(80.8%)和1.2m/s,其年变化趋势与江口县一致,均呈下降趋势。对梵净山和江口县旅游气候适宜性进行了比较分析。江口县冬季旅游气候适宜性一般,其余月份适宜,7、8月份旅游气候适宜性指数均低于70。梵净山适宜夏季,旅游气候适宜性指数高于70,但1 - 4月和10 - 12月旅游适宜性较差。梵净山景区历史数据的重构为三维旅游气候资源分析和夏季旅游经济的发展提供了数据支撑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improvement of L-band Wind Profile Radar System Research and Application of Meteorological Data Transmission System Based on Virtual Desktop Design and implementation of the maximum dimension algorithm for ice crystal particles recorded by 2D image probe Design and Implementation of Intelligent Support System for National Ground Observation Stations in Guizhou Design and Implementation of Signal Processing for Software Doppler Weather Radar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1