RT-PCR test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs: results of the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay versus the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 CE IVD

Dramane Zoungrana, S. Rouamba, D. Nezien, Serge Sougué, E. Kabré
{"title":"RT-PCR test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs: results of the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay versus the Thermo fisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 CE IVD","authors":"Dramane Zoungrana, S. Rouamba, D. Nezien, Serge Sougué, E. Kabré","doi":"10.54203/jlsb.2022.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In the response to the coronavirus pandemic, several PCR kits have been developed with varying performance. Aim. In this study, we compared the results of SARS-CoV-2 testing using the Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid EUA) Testing with the TaqPathTM -COVID-19 CE IVD kit. Methods. A total of 92 nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients during September to November 2021 at the National Public Health Laboratory in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. These samples were analyzed using both the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay and the TaqPath-COVID-19-CE IVD kit on the QuantStudio 5 thermal cycler after extraction with the ANDiS 350 automated extractor. Results. The majority of patients was male 68.48% (63/92) and female 31.52% (29/92). The mean age was 42.2 ± 13.76 years with extremes of 12 and 70 years. The Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 kit showed positive agreement with a kappa coefficient of 93.35% [85.9; 100] compared to the TaqPath-COVID-19-CE IVD kit. It also showed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 92.68 and negative and positive predictive values of 100% and 94.44% respectively. Conclusion. The Xpert Xpress test is a very simple assay that compares favorably with the TaqPath-COVID-19-CE IVD test and can be reliably used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens. ","PeriodicalId":113264,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Life Science and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54203/jlsb.2022.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. In the response to the coronavirus pandemic, several PCR kits have been developed with varying performance. Aim. In this study, we compared the results of SARS-CoV-2 testing using the Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid EUA) Testing with the TaqPathTM -COVID-19 CE IVD kit. Methods. A total of 92 nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients during September to November 2021 at the National Public Health Laboratory in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. These samples were analyzed using both the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay and the TaqPath-COVID-19-CE IVD kit on the QuantStudio 5 thermal cycler after extraction with the ANDiS 350 automated extractor. Results. The majority of patients was male 68.48% (63/92) and female 31.52% (29/92). The mean age was 42.2 ± 13.76 years with extremes of 12 and 70 years. The Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 kit showed positive agreement with a kappa coefficient of 93.35% [85.9; 100] compared to the TaqPath-COVID-19-CE IVD kit. It also showed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 92.68 and negative and positive predictive values of 100% and 94.44% respectively. Conclusion. The Xpert Xpress test is a very simple assay that compares favorably with the TaqPath-COVID-19-CE IVD test and can be reliably used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal specimens. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻咽拭子中SARS-CoV-2的RT-PCR检测:Cepheid Xpert®Xpress SARS-CoV-2检测与Thermo fisher TaqPath™COVID-19 CE IVD检测的结果
介绍。为应对冠状病毒大流行,开发了几种性能各异的PCR试剂盒。的目标。本研究比较了Xpert®Xpress SARS-CoV-2 (Cepheid EUA)检测试剂盒与TaqPathTM -COVID-19 CE IVD试剂盒检测结果。方法。2021年9月至11月期间在布基纳法索瓦加杜古国家公共卫生实验室采集了92份患者鼻咽拭子样本。这些样品在ANDiS 350自动提取器提取后,在QuantStudio 5热循环机上使用Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2检测试剂盒和TaqPath-COVID-19-CE IVD试剂盒进行分析。结果。男性占68.48%(63/92),女性占31.52%(29/92)。平均年龄42.2±13.76岁,极值12岁、70岁。Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2试剂盒的kappa系数为93.35%;[100]与TaqPath-COVID-19-CE IVD试剂盒相比。其敏感性为100%,特异性为92.68,阴性预测值为100%,阳性预测值为94.44%。结论。Xpert Xpress检测是一种非常简单的检测方法,与TaqPath-COVID-19-CE IVD检测相比具有优势,可可靠地用于检测鼻咽标本中的SARS-CoV-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the diets and food security of households hosting and not hosting internally displaced persons in the Kora, Burkina Faso Food consumption and dietary diversity associated with breastfeeding mod of children aged 6-23 months in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso Survival rates and quality of life of patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair Outcomes of pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to intensive care unit in Uzbekistan The quality of life of lumbar compression radiculopathy patients under microsurgical treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1