Evaluation of Effectiveness of Wet Cupping versus Blood Donation on Hematological Parameters in Healthy Young Adults

Z. Mustafa, S. Sheiko
{"title":"Evaluation of Effectiveness of Wet Cupping versus Blood Donation on Hematological Parameters in Healthy Young Adults","authors":"Z. Mustafa, S. Sheiko","doi":"10.15218/ejnm.2020.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds and objectives: Therapeutic phlebotomy is the removal of blood from the body that has been practiced since ancient time for treating the illnesses. Recently, interest in wet cupping to treat various hematological disorders particularly polycythemia and high hemoglobin in public has grown. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of wet cupping versus blood donation on hematological parameters. \nMethods: A total of 60 healthy young adults were assigned non-randomly either in cupping (n=30) or blood donation (n=30) groups. Blood samples were collected from all subjects to measure hematological parameters before and one week after interventions. Subjects of wet cupping and blood donation were matched in age and baseline hematological parameters. \nResults: The findings of the study showed a significant difference in hematological parameters of wet-cupping and blood donation including Hb level (14.87 vs. 14.39), PCV (44.78 vs. 42.91), and RBC (5.27 vs. 4.94), respectively. While the values of other parameters were not different significantly; MCV (85.15 vs. 86.95), MCH (28.31 vs. 29.20), MCHC (33.24 vs. 33.57), RDW (12.53 vs. 12.40), platelet (245.77 vs. 246.27), and WBC (7.47 vs. 7.47), respectively. \nConclusion: The present study suggests that both wet-cupping and blood donation are effective interventions in reducing hematological parameters.","PeriodicalId":250078,"journal":{"name":"Erbil Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Erbil Journal of Nursing and Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15218/ejnm.2020.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Backgrounds and objectives: Therapeutic phlebotomy is the removal of blood from the body that has been practiced since ancient time for treating the illnesses. Recently, interest in wet cupping to treat various hematological disorders particularly polycythemia and high hemoglobin in public has grown. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of wet cupping versus blood donation on hematological parameters. Methods: A total of 60 healthy young adults were assigned non-randomly either in cupping (n=30) or blood donation (n=30) groups. Blood samples were collected from all subjects to measure hematological parameters before and one week after interventions. Subjects of wet cupping and blood donation were matched in age and baseline hematological parameters. Results: The findings of the study showed a significant difference in hematological parameters of wet-cupping and blood donation including Hb level (14.87 vs. 14.39), PCV (44.78 vs. 42.91), and RBC (5.27 vs. 4.94), respectively. While the values of other parameters were not different significantly; MCV (85.15 vs. 86.95), MCH (28.31 vs. 29.20), MCHC (33.24 vs. 33.57), RDW (12.53 vs. 12.40), platelet (245.77 vs. 246.27), and WBC (7.47 vs. 7.47), respectively. Conclusion: The present study suggests that both wet-cupping and blood donation are effective interventions in reducing hematological parameters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价湿拔罐与献血对健康青壮年血液指标的影响
背景和目的:治疗性静脉切开术是将血液从身体中移除,自古以来一直用于治疗疾病。近年来,公众对湿罐治疗各种血液病,特别是红细胞增多症和高血红蛋白的兴趣越来越大。本研究旨在评价湿拔罐与献血对血液学指标的影响。方法:将60名健康青年随机分为拔罐组(n=30)和献血组(n=30)。在干预前和干预后一周,采集所有受试者的血液样本测量血液学参数。湿拔罐和献血受试者的年龄和基线血液学参数相匹配。结果:研究结果显示,湿拔罐与献血者血液学指标Hb (14.87 vs. 14.39)、PCV (44.78 vs. 42.91)、RBC (5.27 vs. 4.94)差异有统计学意义。而其他参数值差异不显著;MCV (85.15 vs. 86.95)、MCH (28.31 vs. 29.20)、MCHC (33.24 vs. 33.57)、RDW (12.53 vs. 12.40)、血小板(245.77 vs. 246.27)和白细胞(7.47 vs. 7.47)。结论:湿拔罐和献血是降低血液学指标的有效干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Home Health Care Services Delivered by Nurses to the Relatives with COVID-19 Mothers’ Knowledge Regarding Home Care Management of Neonatal Jaundice in Qaladze - Sulaymaniyah City Knowledge and Attitudes about Precautionary Measures of COVID-19 among Undergraduate Students: A Comparative Study Lifestyle Factors and Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Cross-sectional Study Caregiver’s Knowledge regarding Homecare Management of Spastic Cerebral Palsy Children Under 12 Years Old in Rapareen Province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1