Hate Speech, Subject Agency and Performativity of Bodies

Haeook Jeong
{"title":"Hate Speech, Subject Agency and Performativity of Bodies","authors":"Haeook Jeong","doi":"10.19116/theory.2023.28.1.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hate speech is any form of expression that vilifies and discriminates against individuals or groups based on their identity, including race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, religion, and more. However, hate speech is not merely an emotional expression; it can often be intertwined with fake news and logical reasoning that appears convincing. This article explores Judith Butler's theories on hate speech, how she resists it, and how to draw a good life out of a bad life. Firstly, it examines the limitations of the traditional dichotomy between reason and emotion and how it relates to issues such as hate speech, fake news, and post-truth. Secondly, it analyzes hate speech as either an illocutionary or perlocutionary speech act, and reviews legal cases related to hate speech in the USA through Judith Butler's Excitable Speech(1997). Thirdly, it explores Butler's analysis of Freud's work in The Force Of Nonviolence(2020), including his ideas about the importance of emotional ties and communities of feeling, and how he aimed to overcome blind fury in his later years. The article also discusses how Butler supplements Freud's unfinished research and extends his ideas beyond their original limits. Finally, the implications of these attempts for Korean society, which is currently grappling with the problem of hate speech, are examined in the last section.","PeriodicalId":409687,"journal":{"name":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Criticism and Theory Society of Korea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2023.28.1.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hate speech is any form of expression that vilifies and discriminates against individuals or groups based on their identity, including race, ethnicity, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, religion, and more. However, hate speech is not merely an emotional expression; it can often be intertwined with fake news and logical reasoning that appears convincing. This article explores Judith Butler's theories on hate speech, how she resists it, and how to draw a good life out of a bad life. Firstly, it examines the limitations of the traditional dichotomy between reason and emotion and how it relates to issues such as hate speech, fake news, and post-truth. Secondly, it analyzes hate speech as either an illocutionary or perlocutionary speech act, and reviews legal cases related to hate speech in the USA through Judith Butler's Excitable Speech(1997). Thirdly, it explores Butler's analysis of Freud's work in The Force Of Nonviolence(2020), including his ideas about the importance of emotional ties and communities of feeling, and how he aimed to overcome blind fury in his later years. The article also discusses how Butler supplements Freud's unfinished research and extends his ideas beyond their original limits. Finally, the implications of these attempts for Korean society, which is currently grappling with the problem of hate speech, are examined in the last section.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仇恨言论、主体能动性与身体的表演性
仇恨言论是基于个人或群体的身份,包括种族、民族、国籍、性别、性取向、宗教等,诋毁和歧视个人或群体的任何形式的表达。然而,仇恨言论不仅仅是一种情感表达;它往往与假新闻和看似令人信服的逻辑推理交织在一起。本文探讨了朱迪思·巴特勒关于仇恨言论的理论,她是如何抵制仇恨言论的,以及如何从糟糕的生活中描绘出美好的生活。首先,它考察了理性和情感之间传统二分法的局限性,以及它与仇恨言论、假新闻和后真相等问题的关系。其次,将仇恨言论分析为言外行为和言外行为,并通过朱迪思·巴特勒的《激动演讲》(1997)回顾了美国与仇恨言论相关的法律案例。第三,它探讨了巴特勒对弗洛伊德在《非暴力的力量》(2020)一书中工作的分析,包括他关于情感联系和情感社区重要性的观点,以及他如何在晚年克服盲目的愤怒。文章还讨论了巴特勒如何补充弗洛伊德未完成的研究,并将他的思想扩展到原来的范围之外。最后,这些尝试对目前正在努力解决仇恨言论问题的韩国社会的影响将在最后一节进行审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Everything, Everywhere, All at Once in the Deleuzean Light of Pure Becoming and Affect On the Creative Evolution of Modern Literature:Reading Austerlitz Revisiting the Realism/Modernism Debate: Marxist Thought and the Ethics of Representation Huxley’s Vision of Gender Utopia and the Philosopher-Ruled State in The Brave New World Judith Butler and the Ethics and Politic of Bodies: Vulnerability, Precarity, and Open Solidarity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1