Czech Tax Heaven for Sportsmen

Michal Radvan
{"title":"Czech Tax Heaven for Sportsmen","authors":"Michal Radvan","doi":"10.15290/OOLSCPREPI.2018.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no specific legal regulation of professional athletes\nin the Czech Republic. In practice, both individual players and\nteam players are mostly self-employment. In case of team\nplayers, compared to the legal regulation in other European\ncountries, it is quite unique. This article deals with the\nlegal regulation of professional team players, especially in\nthe area of taxation. It works with the hypothesis, stated in\ntwo judgments of the Supreme Administrative Court, that team\nplayers should tax their incomes by the personal incomes tax as\nself-employed persons, i.e. businessmen. In 2011, the Supreme\nAdministrative Court stated that team players are not employees\nof their club and they should pay taxes as from independent\nactivities. The Czech Financial Administration followed this\ndecision and taxed these sportsmen as so called independent\nprofessions. The reason why this issue was reopened by the\nSupreme Administrative Court was the case of football player\nDavid Lafata, who got a business license (he became a\nbusinessman) as a footballer and claimed that playing football\nis not an independent profession, but real business. In both\ncases, the personal income tax base is created as the\ndifference between income and expenditure. As mostly there are\nno real high expenditures, Czech legal regulation allows the\nlump sum expenses: in case of independent profession 40 %, but\nfor business (in this very case) 60 %. The aim of the paper is\nto confirm or disprove the hypothesis stated above, analyzing\nexisting legal regulation and case law, and offer solutions de\nlege ferenda.","PeriodicalId":330166,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/OOLSCPREPI.2018.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is no specific legal regulation of professional athletes in the Czech Republic. In practice, both individual players and team players are mostly self-employment. In case of team players, compared to the legal regulation in other European countries, it is quite unique. This article deals with the legal regulation of professional team players, especially in the area of taxation. It works with the hypothesis, stated in two judgments of the Supreme Administrative Court, that team players should tax their incomes by the personal incomes tax as self-employed persons, i.e. businessmen. In 2011, the Supreme Administrative Court stated that team players are not employees of their club and they should pay taxes as from independent activities. The Czech Financial Administration followed this decision and taxed these sportsmen as so called independent professions. The reason why this issue was reopened by the Supreme Administrative Court was the case of football player David Lafata, who got a business license (he became a businessman) as a footballer and claimed that playing football is not an independent profession, but real business. In both cases, the personal income tax base is created as the difference between income and expenditure. As mostly there are no real high expenditures, Czech legal regulation allows the lump sum expenses: in case of independent profession 40 %, but for business (in this very case) 60 %. The aim of the paper is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis stated above, analyzing existing legal regulation and case law, and offer solutions de lege ferenda.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
捷克是运动员的避税天堂
捷克共和国对职业运动员没有具体的法律规定。在实践中,个人球员和团队球员大多是自主创业的。在团队球员的情况下,与其他欧洲国家的法律规定相比,它是相当独特的。这篇文章讨论了职业球员的法律规定,特别是在税收方面。最高行政法院的两项判决都提出了这样一个假设,即球员应该像个体经营者(即商人)那样对他们的收入征收个人所得税。2011年,最高行政法院表示,球员不是俱乐部的雇员,他们应该像独立活动一样纳税。捷克财政管理局遵循这一决定,将这些运动员作为所谓的独立职业征税。最高行政法院重新讨论这个问题的原因是足球运动员大卫·拉法塔(david Lafata)的案件,他以足球运动员的身份获得了营业执照(他成为了商人),并声称踢足球不是一个独立的职业,而是真正的商业。在这两种情况下,个人所得税的税基都是收入和支出之间的差额。由于大多数情况下没有真正的高额支出,捷克法律规定允许一次性支出:独立职业为40%,但商业(在这种情况下)为60%。本文的目的是通过分析现有的法律规定和判例法来证实或反驳上述假设,并提出解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Misdirected Recipients of Tax Reform: Section 199A, its True Beneficiaries, and Application to Low- and Middle- Income Residents Consistent Taxation in a Cashless Society Is It Time to Eliminate Federal Corporate Income Taxes? Brief of Amici Curiae Former Government Officials in Support of Respondents, CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service Allocating COVID-19 State Aid Equitably – The Case of Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1