Using Flow Diagnostics to Quantify the Impact of Reservoir Rock Typing on Fluid Flow in Complex Carbonate Reservoirs

F. Alhashmi, S. Geiger, Mohamed AlBreiki
{"title":"Using Flow Diagnostics to Quantify the Impact of Reservoir Rock Typing on Fluid Flow in Complex Carbonate Reservoirs","authors":"F. Alhashmi, S. Geiger, Mohamed AlBreiki","doi":"10.2118/196699-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A particular challenge inherent to carbonate reservoirs is reservoir rock typing which impacts model initialisation and saturation distributions and hence STOIIP, phase mobilities, and flow behaviours. We explore how flow diagnostics can be used best to detect subtle differences in reservoir dynamics arising from different model initialisations by comparing flow diagnostics simulations with full-physics simulations.\n Flow diagnostics are applied to two reservoirs, a synthetic but realistic model representing an analogue for the Arab-D formation and a giant carbonate reservoir from the Middle East. Saturation modelling and reservoir rock typing is based on uniform and heterogeneous Pc and kr distributions, and further employs a state-of-the-art software that integrates of SCAL data and log-derived saturations. Sweep efficiency and dynamic Lorenz coefficients are then derived from the flow diagnostics results to quantify and compare the dynamic behaviour of the reservoir models. The full-physics simulations, which are used to validate the flow diagnostics results, are carried out with a commercial Black Oil simulator.\n The flow diagnostics results can clearly distinguish between different homogenous and heterogeneous rock-type distributions, wettability trends, as well as novel saturation modelling approaches that use dedicated software tools. Flow diagnostics capture the same trends in recovery predictions as the full-physics simulations. Importantly though, the total CPU time for a single flow diagnostics calculation including model loading is on the order of seconds, compared to minutes and hours for a single full-physics simulation. These observation give confidence that flow diagnostics can be used effectively to compare and contrast the impact of reservoir rock typing, saturation modelling, and model initialisation on reservoir performance before running full-physics simulations. Flow diagnostic hence allow us to reduce the number of reservoir models from a model ensemble and select a small number of diverse yet realistic reservoir models that capture the full range of geological uncertainties which are then subjected to more detailed reservoir simulation studies.\n Flow diagnostics are particularly well suited for complex carbonate reservoirs which are geologically more complex than clastic reservoirs and often exhibit significant uncertainties. Giant carbonate reservoirs are also challenging to simulate using full-physics simulators due to their size, so the impact of geological uncertainty on the predicted reservoir performance is often underexplored. Flow diagnostics are hence an effective complement to quantify uncertainty in state-of-the-art reservoir modelling, history matching and optimisation workflows, particularly for giant carbonate reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":354509,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, September 19, 2019","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, September 19, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196699-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A particular challenge inherent to carbonate reservoirs is reservoir rock typing which impacts model initialisation and saturation distributions and hence STOIIP, phase mobilities, and flow behaviours. We explore how flow diagnostics can be used best to detect subtle differences in reservoir dynamics arising from different model initialisations by comparing flow diagnostics simulations with full-physics simulations. Flow diagnostics are applied to two reservoirs, a synthetic but realistic model representing an analogue for the Arab-D formation and a giant carbonate reservoir from the Middle East. Saturation modelling and reservoir rock typing is based on uniform and heterogeneous Pc and kr distributions, and further employs a state-of-the-art software that integrates of SCAL data and log-derived saturations. Sweep efficiency and dynamic Lorenz coefficients are then derived from the flow diagnostics results to quantify and compare the dynamic behaviour of the reservoir models. The full-physics simulations, which are used to validate the flow diagnostics results, are carried out with a commercial Black Oil simulator. The flow diagnostics results can clearly distinguish between different homogenous and heterogeneous rock-type distributions, wettability trends, as well as novel saturation modelling approaches that use dedicated software tools. Flow diagnostics capture the same trends in recovery predictions as the full-physics simulations. Importantly though, the total CPU time for a single flow diagnostics calculation including model loading is on the order of seconds, compared to minutes and hours for a single full-physics simulation. These observation give confidence that flow diagnostics can be used effectively to compare and contrast the impact of reservoir rock typing, saturation modelling, and model initialisation on reservoir performance before running full-physics simulations. Flow diagnostic hence allow us to reduce the number of reservoir models from a model ensemble and select a small number of diverse yet realistic reservoir models that capture the full range of geological uncertainties which are then subjected to more detailed reservoir simulation studies. Flow diagnostics are particularly well suited for complex carbonate reservoirs which are geologically more complex than clastic reservoirs and often exhibit significant uncertainties. Giant carbonate reservoirs are also challenging to simulate using full-physics simulators due to their size, so the impact of geological uncertainty on the predicted reservoir performance is often underexplored. Flow diagnostics are hence an effective complement to quantify uncertainty in state-of-the-art reservoir modelling, history matching and optimisation workflows, particularly for giant carbonate reservoirs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用流动诊断技术量化复杂碳酸盐岩储层岩石类型对流体流动的影响
碳酸盐岩储层固有的一个特殊挑战是储层岩石类型,它会影响模型初始化和饱和度分布,从而影响STOIIP、相流动性和流动行为。通过比较流动诊断模拟与全物理模拟,我们探讨了如何最好地利用流动诊断来检测由不同模型初始化引起的储层动力学的细微差异。流体诊断应用于两个储层,一个是模拟阿拉伯- d地层的合成但现实的模型,另一个是来自中东的巨型碳酸盐岩储层。饱和度建模和储层岩石类型是基于均匀和非均匀的Pc和kr分布,并进一步采用了最先进的软件,该软件集成了SCAL数据和测井导出的饱和度。然后,从流动诊断结果中得出扫描效率和动态洛伦兹系数,以量化和比较储层模型的动态行为。采用商用黑油模拟器进行全物理模拟,用于验证流体诊断结果。流动诊断结果可以清楚地区分不同的均质和非均质岩石类型分布、润湿性趋势,以及使用专用软件工具的新型饱和度建模方法。流体诊断与全物理模拟在采收率预测中捕捉到相同的趋势。但重要的是,单个流诊断计算(包括模型加载)的总CPU时间是几秒钟,而单个全物理模拟的CPU时间是几分钟或几小时。这些观察结果表明,在进行全物理模拟之前,流动诊断可以有效地用于比较和对比储层岩石类型、饱和度建模和模型初始化对储层性能的影响。因此,流量诊断使我们能够从模型集合中减少储层模型的数量,并选择少数多种多样但现实的储层模型,这些模型可以捕获全部地质不确定性,然后进行更详细的储层模拟研究。流体诊断特别适用于复杂的碳酸盐岩储层,这些储层的地质情况比碎屑储层更复杂,往往表现出显著的不确定性。由于巨型碳酸盐岩储层的规模,使用全物理模拟器进行模拟也具有挑战性,因此地质不确定性对预测储层性能的影响往往没有得到充分的研究。因此,流体诊断是最先进油藏建模、历史匹配和优化工作流程中量化不确定性的有效补充,特别是对于大型碳酸盐岩油藏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Middle East Karst Carbonate: An Integrated Workflow For Prediction Of Karst Enhancement Distribution Potential Applicability of Miscible N2 Flooding in High-Temperature Abu Dhabi Reservoir Modelling Dispersed Chemical Droplets Injection in the Gas Stream for EOR Applications A Collaborative Approach to Risk Assessment and Mitigation of Pre-Production Cross-Flow for a Multi-Billion Dollar Sour Field Development Project in the Sultanate of Oman: A Case Study Multidisciplinary Approach for Unconventional Reservoirs Characterisation by Integrating Wireline Openhole Logging Techniques – Electric and Sonic to Formation Testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1