Evaluation of design and code revisions in academic practices of software engineering

Leonardo Bermón Angarita, Juan Pablo León Tovar
{"title":"Evaluation of design and code revisions in academic practices of software engineering","authors":"Leonardo Bermón Angarita, Juan Pablo León Tovar","doi":"10.1109/CIMPS.2017.8169951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personal Software Process (PSP) is a process that develops individual skills in software engineers to control and improve the quality of their work practices. This paper presents an evaluative study on the effectiveness of design and code reviews includes into the PSP development activities. The study carried out with students of the Management Information Systems in National University of Colombia — Manizales. An experiment was designed to develop a program using PSP scripts forms standards and measures. The program was developed by two groups of students one group used the revisions and the other did not. Test hypotheses carried out show that there are no significant differences in the effectiveness of PSP code and design revisions compared to traditional development in which no revisions are made. However design and code reviews achieved to eliminate defects in the early stages effectively. This work benefits software engineers to know the effectiveness of design and code reviews from an empirical point of view.","PeriodicalId":265026,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th International Conference on Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th International Conference on Software Process Improvement (CIMPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIMPS.2017.8169951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Personal Software Process (PSP) is a process that develops individual skills in software engineers to control and improve the quality of their work practices. This paper presents an evaluative study on the effectiveness of design and code reviews includes into the PSP development activities. The study carried out with students of the Management Information Systems in National University of Colombia — Manizales. An experiment was designed to develop a program using PSP scripts forms standards and measures. The program was developed by two groups of students one group used the revisions and the other did not. Test hypotheses carried out show that there are no significant differences in the effectiveness of PSP code and design revisions compared to traditional development in which no revisions are made. However design and code reviews achieved to eliminate defects in the early stages effectively. This work benefits software engineers to know the effectiveness of design and code reviews from an empirical point of view.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件工程学术实践中设计和代码修订的评估
个人软件过程(PSP)是开发软件工程师控制和改进其工作实践质量的个人技能的过程。本文提出了一项关于设计和代码审查的有效性的评估研究,这些审查包括在PSP开发活动中。这项研究是与哥伦比亚国立大学马尼萨莱斯管理信息系统专业的学生一起进行的。设计了一个实验,利用PSP脚本开发程序,形成标准和措施。该程序由两组学生开发,一组使用修订版本,另一组没有。进行的测试假设表明,与不进行修订的传统开发相比,PSP代码和设计修订的有效性没有显着差异。然而,设计和代码审查能够有效地消除早期阶段的缺陷。这项工作有利于软件工程师从经验的角度了解设计和代码审查的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proposal of methodology for a data WareHousing process: Use case: Generation of indicators of academic productivity of a university) Process improvement for the communication of elementary school homework between teachers and parents Reinforcing DevOps approach with security and risk management: An experience of implementing it in a data center of a mexican organization Lifecycle coverage analysis via multi-agent system methodology A model driven method for data migration: Data migrattion with MDA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1