From Protocolization of Care to Nursing Care Practice: A Qualitative Research

John Camilo Garcia
{"title":"From Protocolization of Care to Nursing Care Practice: A Qualitative Research","authors":"John Camilo Garcia","doi":"10.12691/ajnr-9-1-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative research tries to understand experiences and meaning that nurses have about nurse care protocols, since its nature, advantages, or disadvantages. Methods: some elements of ethnography were used for data recollecting, and grounded theory was used for analyzing information, 7 nurses, with wide experience in protocols development and implementation, were interviewed. Results: the main categories were that protocols are necessary, but in some cases, nurses do not follow protocols and nurses follow them excessively, in both cases, a care deconstruction takes place, results were analyzed from Betty Neuman theory. Conclusion: protocols should be rethought, they might be called just guidelines, nurses should think systematically and critically, caring is more than following protocols, when nurses just do what protocols suggest, they are not caring, they are breaking the care as a concept and as a practice, nurses have to care of caring in order for caring people.","PeriodicalId":210760,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/ajnr-9-1-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative research tries to understand experiences and meaning that nurses have about nurse care protocols, since its nature, advantages, or disadvantages. Methods: some elements of ethnography were used for data recollecting, and grounded theory was used for analyzing information, 7 nurses, with wide experience in protocols development and implementation, were interviewed. Results: the main categories were that protocols are necessary, but in some cases, nurses do not follow protocols and nurses follow them excessively, in both cases, a care deconstruction takes place, results were analyzed from Betty Neuman theory. Conclusion: protocols should be rethought, they might be called just guidelines, nurses should think systematically and critically, caring is more than following protocols, when nurses just do what protocols suggest, they are not caring, they are breaking the care as a concept and as a practice, nurses have to care of caring in order for caring people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从照护协议化到照护实务:质性研究
本定性研究试图了解经验和意义,护士有护士护理协议,因为它的性质,优点,或缺点。方法:运用民族志的一些要素进行数据收集,运用扎根理论进行信息分析,对7名在方案制定和实施方面具有丰富经验的护士进行访谈。结果:主要分类为协议是必要的,但在某些情况下,护士不遵守协议和护士过度遵守协议,这两种情况都发生了护理解构,从贝蒂纽曼理论分析结果。结论:协议应该被重新思考,它们可能被称为只是指南,护士应该系统地和批判性地思考,关怀不仅仅是遵循协议,当护士只是按照协议的建议去做时,他们不关心,他们破坏了作为一种概念和实践的关怀,护士必须关心关心的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nurses Perception of Contact Precaution in Preventing Multi-Drug Resistance Acinetobacter baumanii Outbreak in ICU A Study on the Correlation between Depression, Self-Efficacy and Hope of Nursing Vocational College Students under Public Emergencies Communication Barriers between Nurses and Patients during Hospitalization in Saudi Arabia Nursing Friendly Hospital: Improving Working Environments for Nurses in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia The COVID Catastrophe: Counting the Cost of Crisis amongst the Critical Care Nursing Workforce in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1