Dodd-Frank's Abusive Standard: A Call for Certainty

Johnquan D. Wright
{"title":"Dodd-Frank's Abusive Standard: A Call for Certainty","authors":"Johnquan D. Wright","doi":"10.15779/Z38XC60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (hereinafter, “Dodd-Frank” or the “Act”) promises to radically transform the U.S. financial services industry. The Act was based on five objectives for financial regulatory reform articulated by the Obama Administration in a June 2009 white paper: 1) promote supervision and regulation of financial firms; 2) establish comprehensive supervision of financial markets; 3) protect consumers and investors from financial abuse; 4) provide the government with the tools it needs to manage financial crises; and 5) raise international regulatory standards and improve international cooperation. Given the scale of transformation involved, Dodd-Frank is the most significant financial services reform legislation since the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the Glass-Steagall Act, and federal securities laws of the 1930s. For banks and others in the financial services industry who deal primarily with consumers, the most radical change resulting from the Act is the establishment of a new agency, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (hereinafter, the “Bureau”), solely","PeriodicalId":326069,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38XC60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (hereinafter, “Dodd-Frank” or the “Act”) promises to radically transform the U.S. financial services industry. The Act was based on five objectives for financial regulatory reform articulated by the Obama Administration in a June 2009 white paper: 1) promote supervision and regulation of financial firms; 2) establish comprehensive supervision of financial markets; 3) protect consumers and investors from financial abuse; 4) provide the government with the tools it needs to manage financial crises; and 5) raise international regulatory standards and improve international cooperation. Given the scale of transformation involved, Dodd-Frank is the most significant financial services reform legislation since the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the Glass-Steagall Act, and federal securities laws of the 1930s. For banks and others in the financial services industry who deal primarily with consumers, the most radical change resulting from the Act is the establishment of a new agency, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (hereinafter, the “Bureau”), solely
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多德-弗兰克法案的滥用标准:呼吁确定性
2010年多德-弗兰克华尔街改革和消费者保护法案(以下简称“多德-弗兰克”或“法案”)承诺从根本上改变美国金融服务业。该法案基于奥巴马政府在2009年6月的白皮书中阐述的金融监管改革的五个目标:1)促进对金融公司的监督和管理;2)建立对金融市场的全面监管;3)保护消费者和投资者免受金融滥用;4)为政府提供管理金融危机所需的工具;5)提高国际监管标准,加强国际合作。考虑到改革的规模,多德-弗兰克法案是自《联邦存款保险法》(Federal Deposit Insurance Act)、《格拉斯-斯蒂格尔法案》(Glass-Steagall Act)和上世纪30年代的联邦证券法以来最重要的金融服务改革立法。对于银行和其他主要与消费者打交道的金融服务行业来说,该法案带来的最根本的变化是建立了一个新的机构,即消费者金融保护局(以下简称“局”)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Responsibility of Business Is Not Social Responsibility: Assume That There Are No Angels and Allow the Free Market's Touch of Heaven Piercing the Corporate Veil: Historical, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives Effectively Discharging Fiduciary Duties in IP-Rich M&A Transactions The Enigma of Hostile Takeovers in Japan: Bidder Beware National Security Review in Foreign Investments: A Comparative and Critical Assessment on China and U.S. Laws and Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1