Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]

Locke Studies Pub Date : 2018-12-08 DOI:10.5206/LS.2018.6177
D. Deluna
{"title":"Shaftesbury, Locke, and Their Revolutionary Letter? [Corrigendum]","authors":"D. Deluna","doi":"10.5206/LS.2018.6177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A correction of an article originally published in vol 17 (2017). \nIn 1675, the anonymous Letter to a Person of Quality was condemned in the House of Lords and ordered to be burned by the public hangman.  A propagandistic work that has long been attributed to Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, and less certainly to his secretary John Locke, it traduced hard-line Anglican legislation considered in Parliament that year—namely the Test Bill, proposing that office-holders and MPs swear off political militancy and indeed any efforts to reform the Church and State.  Careful examination of the text of the Letter, and that of one of its sources in the Reasons against the Bill for the Test, also circulated in 1675, reveals the presence of highly seditious passages of covert historical allegory.  Hitherto un-noted by modern scholars, this allegory compared King Charles II to the weak and intermittently mad Henry VI, while agitating for armed revolt against a government made prey to popish and French captors.  The discovery compels modification, through chronological revision and also re-assessment of the probability of Locke’s authorship of the Letter, of Richard Ashcraft’s picture of Shaftesbury and Locke as first-time revolutionaries for the cause of religious tolerance in the early 1680s.  Even more significantly, it lends support to Ashcraft’s view of the nature and intent of duplicitous published writings from the Shaftesbury circle, whose members included Robert Ferguson, ‘the Plotter’ and pamphleteer at home in the world of skilled biblical hermeneutics.  Cultivated for stealthy revolutionary purposes, these writings came with designs of engaging discrete reading networks within England’s culture of Protestant dissent.","PeriodicalId":165811,"journal":{"name":"Locke Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Locke Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/LS.2018.6177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A correction of an article originally published in vol 17 (2017). In 1675, the anonymous Letter to a Person of Quality was condemned in the House of Lords and ordered to be burned by the public hangman.  A propagandistic work that has long been attributed to Anthony Ashley Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, and less certainly to his secretary John Locke, it traduced hard-line Anglican legislation considered in Parliament that year—namely the Test Bill, proposing that office-holders and MPs swear off political militancy and indeed any efforts to reform the Church and State.  Careful examination of the text of the Letter, and that of one of its sources in the Reasons against the Bill for the Test, also circulated in 1675, reveals the presence of highly seditious passages of covert historical allegory.  Hitherto un-noted by modern scholars, this allegory compared King Charles II to the weak and intermittently mad Henry VI, while agitating for armed revolt against a government made prey to popish and French captors.  The discovery compels modification, through chronological revision and also re-assessment of the probability of Locke’s authorship of the Letter, of Richard Ashcraft’s picture of Shaftesbury and Locke as first-time revolutionaries for the cause of religious tolerance in the early 1680s.  Even more significantly, it lends support to Ashcraft’s view of the nature and intent of duplicitous published writings from the Shaftesbury circle, whose members included Robert Ferguson, ‘the Plotter’ and pamphleteer at home in the world of skilled biblical hermeneutics.  Cultivated for stealthy revolutionary purposes, these writings came with designs of engaging discrete reading networks within England’s culture of Protestant dissent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙夫茨伯里、洛克和他们的革命书信?(勘误表)
对最初发表在第17卷(2017)的一篇文章的更正。1675年,《致贵人的匿名信》在上议院受到谴责,并被下令由刽子手焚烧。长期以来,人们一直认为这是沙夫茨伯里第一代伯爵安东尼·阿什利·库珀(Anthony Ashley Cooper)的宣传工作,但对他的秘书约翰·洛克(John Locke)则不太确定。这篇文章诋毁了当年议会审议的英国国教强硬立法——即《测试法案》(Test Bill),该法案建议公职人员和国会议员发誓放弃政治斗争,以及任何改革教会和国家的努力。仔细检查这封信的文本,以及同样在1675年流传的《反对考试法案的理由》中的一个来源,揭示了高度煽动性的秘密历史寓言段落的存在。这则寓言将国王查理二世比作软弱、时而疯狂的亨利六世,鼓动武装反抗被教皇和法国俘虏的政府。这一发现迫使人们进行修改,通过时间顺序的修正,并重新评估洛克是《信》作者的可能性,理查德·阿什克拉夫特把沙夫茨伯里和洛克描绘成1680年代早期宗教宽容事业的第一批革命者。更重要的是,它支持了阿什克拉夫特关于沙夫茨伯里圈子发表的两面派作品的性质和意图的观点,沙夫茨伯里圈子的成员包括罗伯特·弗格森,“阴谋者”和熟练的圣经解释学世界的小册子作者。这些作品是为了隐秘的革命目的而培养的,它们的设计目的是在英格兰新教异见文化中融入离散的阅读网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review of Locke on Persons and Personal Identity by Ruth Boeker Locke on Prerogative Sameness, Persons, and the Resurrection "Wholly Useless and Unserviceable to Knowledge" Locke, Active Power, and a Puzzle about Ascription
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1