The Traffic Safety Culture of (European) Car Drivers: Operationalizing the Concept of TSC by Re-analyzing the SARTRE 4 Study

C. Brandstätter, C. Schlembach, G. Furian, Susanne Kaiser
{"title":"The Traffic Safety Culture of (European) Car Drivers: Operationalizing the Concept of TSC by Re-analyzing the SARTRE 4 Study","authors":"C. Brandstätter, C. Schlembach, G. Furian, Susanne Kaiser","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78714-617-420191008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nIn this chapter we interpret traffic safety culture (TSC) in terms of data on beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors from the fourth wave of the SARTRE study to find out whether they can be interpreted in a perspective. The SARTRE study is a European-wide survey that started in 1991 and collects information on mobility, risk perceptions, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences on the road (Cauzard, 1998, 2004; Cestac & Delhomme, 2012). The chapter focuses on the group of car drivers. \n \nA principal component factor analysis was conducted to explore the underlying structure of the data set. Results suggest an underlying structure of five components which explain more than 55% of the variance. These dimensions were labeled (1) acceptance of technology and enforcement, (2) risk attitudes, (3) experienced and self-exerted behavioral control, (4) personal concern, (5) perception of other road users’ safety performance. \n \nThe influence of these five factors on safety performance (fatality rates) was estimated by regression analysis. Results show that only the second factor (risk attitudes) has a significant effect on fatality rates. As a consequence, expressive and instrumental attitudes about risk-taking should be addressed in driver training as well as information campaigns in order to improve safety culture at the level of individual car drivers.","PeriodicalId":438575,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Safety Culture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Safety Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-617-420191008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In this chapter we interpret traffic safety culture (TSC) in terms of data on beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors from the fourth wave of the SARTRE study to find out whether they can be interpreted in a perspective. The SARTRE study is a European-wide survey that started in 1991 and collects information on mobility, risk perceptions, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences on the road (Cauzard, 1998, 2004; Cestac & Delhomme, 2012). The chapter focuses on the group of car drivers. A principal component factor analysis was conducted to explore the underlying structure of the data set. Results suggest an underlying structure of five components which explain more than 55% of the variance. These dimensions were labeled (1) acceptance of technology and enforcement, (2) risk attitudes, (3) experienced and self-exerted behavioral control, (4) personal concern, (5) perception of other road users’ safety performance. The influence of these five factors on safety performance (fatality rates) was estimated by regression analysis. Results show that only the second factor (risk attitudes) has a significant effect on fatality rates. As a consequence, expressive and instrumental attitudes about risk-taking should be addressed in driver training as well as information campaigns in order to improve safety culture at the level of individual car drivers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(欧洲)汽车驾驶员的交通安全文化:通过重新分析SARTRE 4研究来实现TSC概念
在本章中,我们从SARTRE研究的第四波中对交通安全文化(TSC)的信仰、态度和行为数据进行解释,以了解它们是否可以从一个角度进行解释。SARTRE研究是一项始于1991年的欧洲范围内的调查,收集有关交通、风险认知、态度、行为和道路经验的信息(Cauzard, 1998, 2004;Cestac & Delhomme, 2012)。这一章的重点是汽车司机群体。进行主成分因子分析以探索数据集的底层结构。结果表明,五个组成部分的潜在结构解释了55%以上的方差。这些维度被标记为(1)接受技术和执行,(2)风险态度,(3)经验和自我施加的行为控制,(4)个人关注,(5)感知其他道路使用者的安全表现。通过回归分析估计这五个因素对安全性能(死亡率)的影响。结果表明,只有第二个因素(风险态度)对死亡率有显著影响。因此,应在驾驶员培训和宣传运动中处理关于冒险的表达性和工具性态度,以便改善个别汽车驾驶员一级的安全文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety Citizenship Behavior: A Complementary Paradigm to Improving Safety Culture Within the Organizational Driving Setting The Network Response: Building Structured Partnerships to Enhance Traffic Safety Traffic Safety Culture and the Levels of Value Internalization: A List of Alterable Factors Applying the Traffic Safety Culture Approach in Low- and Middle-income Countries Designing and Evaluating Road Safety Advertising Campaigns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1