ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SEMARANG NO.2/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2020/PN.SMG MENGENAI PERMOHONAN PEMBATALAN HOMOLOGASI

Nur Khasanah, Efi Yulistyowati, Agus Saiful Abib
{"title":"ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SEMARANG NO.2/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2020/PN.SMG MENGENAI PERMOHONAN PEMBATALAN HOMOLOGASI","authors":"Nur Khasanah, Efi Yulistyowati, Agus Saiful Abib","doi":"10.26623/slr.v3i2.3974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT        Homologation is the ratification of reconciliation by the judge on the agreement between the debtor and creditor to end bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is one way to resolve debt disputes that smother a debtor, where the debtor no longer has the ability to pay his debts to his creditors. One of the bankruptcy decisions that will be studied in this research is the Semarang District Court Decision Number 2/Pdt.sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg. Regarding the request for cancellation of homologation, by discussing the problem of analyzing the judge's consideration in the decision of the Semarang District Court No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg regarding the Request for Cancellation of Homologation and its legal consequences. Based on this, the type of this research is normative juridical with a case approach, the research specification is descriptive and analytical. The data used is secondary data, which is taken by means of literature study and documentation study. The data is then analyzed qualitatively. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the consideration of the Panel of Judges to grant the Petitioner's request in the Decision of the Semarang District Court No.13/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018.PN.Smg is correct because the Respondent was proven negligent/default in fulfilling the contents of the Homologation agreement agreed between PT.BMI TBK and PT.TS in their arrangement there are achievements that must be fulfilled by PT.TS, namely the payment of debt of 82% (eighty two percent) of the total principal debt of the Respondent to the Petitioner or the equivalent of Rp.106,604,576,766, - (one hundred six billion six hundred four million five hundred seventy six thousand seven hundred and sixty six Rupiah) no later than 6 (six months) from the date of the Homologation Decision This is in accordance with the contents of Article 170 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004. Legal consequences from the Semarang District Court Decision No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg PT.TS must be Bankrupt with all the legal consequences this is in accordance with Article 291 paragraph (2) of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU. Keywords : Decision, Court, Cancellation, Homologation.","PeriodicalId":442012,"journal":{"name":"Semarang Law Review (SLR)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semarang Law Review (SLR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v3i2.3974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT        Homologation is the ratification of reconciliation by the judge on the agreement between the debtor and creditor to end bankruptcy. Bankruptcy is one way to resolve debt disputes that smother a debtor, where the debtor no longer has the ability to pay his debts to his creditors. One of the bankruptcy decisions that will be studied in this research is the Semarang District Court Decision Number 2/Pdt.sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg. Regarding the request for cancellation of homologation, by discussing the problem of analyzing the judge's consideration in the decision of the Semarang District Court No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg regarding the Request for Cancellation of Homologation and its legal consequences. Based on this, the type of this research is normative juridical with a case approach, the research specification is descriptive and analytical. The data used is secondary data, which is taken by means of literature study and documentation study. The data is then analyzed qualitatively. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the consideration of the Panel of Judges to grant the Petitioner's request in the Decision of the Semarang District Court No.13/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018.PN.Smg is correct because the Respondent was proven negligent/default in fulfilling the contents of the Homologation agreement agreed between PT.BMI TBK and PT.TS in their arrangement there are achievements that must be fulfilled by PT.TS, namely the payment of debt of 82% (eighty two percent) of the total principal debt of the Respondent to the Petitioner or the equivalent of Rp.106,604,576,766, - (one hundred six billion six hundred four million five hundred seventy six thousand seven hundred and sixty six Rupiah) no later than 6 (six months) from the date of the Homologation Decision This is in accordance with the contents of Article 170 paragraph (1) of Law No. 37 of 2004. Legal consequences from the Semarang District Court Decision No.2/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020/PN.Smg PT.TS must be Bankrupt with all the legal consequences this is in accordance with Article 291 paragraph (2) of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU. Keywords : Decision, Court, Cancellation, Homologation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
判决分析2号/PDT. su -破产/2020 - PN。关于同性撤销请求的SMG
【摘要】认定是法官对债务人与债权人达成的终止破产协议的和解予以认可。破产是解决令债务人窒息的债务纠纷的一种方式,即债务人不再有能力向债权人偿还债务。本研究将研究的破产判决之一是三宝垄地方法院第2号判决/ pd .sus- pailit /2020/PN.Smg。关于取消认可的请求,通过讨论分析三宝垄地方法院第2号/ pdt . su - pailit /2020/PN决定中法官的考虑问题。关于取消认证请求及其法律后果的通知。在此基础上,本研究的类型为规范法学与案例研究法,研究规范为描述性与分析性。所用资料为二手资料,采用文献研究法和文献研究法。然后对数据进行定性分析。根据这项研究的结果,可以得出结论,法官小组考虑批准三宝垄地方法院第13/ pdt . su - pkpu /2018.PN号决定中申诉人的请求。Smg是正确的,因为被申请人在履行PT.BMI TBK和PT.TS在他们的安排中达成的认可协议的内容方面被证明是疏忽/违约,所以PT.TS必须履行一些成就,即向申请人支付被申请人总债务的82%(82%)的债务或相当于Rp.106,604,576,766。根据2004年第37号法律第170条第(1)款的内容,自批准决定之日起不迟于6(6)个月。三宝垄地方法院第2号判决的法律后果/ pdt . su - pailit /2020/PN。根据《破产法》第291条第2款和PKPU的规定,Smg PT.TS必须破产,并承担一切法律后果。关键词:判决,法院,撤销,认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA LOKIKA SANGGRAHA DALAM PUTUSAN NO.997/PID.SUS/2019/PN.DPS IMPLEMENTASI PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM BAGI MASYARAKAT MISKIN MELALUI POSBAKUM DI PENGADILAN AGAMA DEMAK KELAS IB PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PARA PIHAK AKIBAT WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN FRANCHISE PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 72/PDT.G/2013/PN. KDI PENANGANAN PERDAGANGAN GELAP NARKOTIKA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL DAN NASIONAL PENGELOLAAN ALOKASI DANA DESA DALAM PROGRAM PEMBANGUNAN DESA DI DESA MUKTIHARJO KECAMATAN MARGOREJO KABUPATEN PATI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1