Influences on Indigenous Labour Market Outcomes

Annie Savvas, C. Boulton, E. Jepsen
{"title":"Influences on Indigenous Labour Market Outcomes","authors":"Annie Savvas, C. Boulton, E. Jepsen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2006294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This staff working paper (by Savvas, Boulton, and Jepson) examines factors that potentially influence Indigenous labour market outcomes (LMOs). It uses regression analysis, and builds on the simple model that was presented in the ‘Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage: Key Indicators (OID) 2011’, by including additional variables. The analysis uses the 2008 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey (NATSISS), a rich source of information on the characteristics of Indigenous people, including data on LMOs and many factors that might contribute to them. The analysis does not make comparisons with non-Indigenous Australians. Empirical analysis can be used to test and quantify relationships that have been developed in theory. For example, policy makers might be interested in those factors that have the greatest association with Indigenous people’s decisions to participate in the labour market and their success in obtaining a job. The purpose of this analysis is to quantify those associations. The aim is to add variables that represent social and cultural factors to the basic model in the 2011 OID Report to obtain insight into the effects of unobserved personal characteristics, and whether the way Indigenous people engage with their community and culture affects their LMOs. The views expressed in this paper are those of the staff involved and do not necessarily reflect those of the Productivity Commission.","PeriodicalId":306816,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics eJournal","volume":"2000 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2006294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This staff working paper (by Savvas, Boulton, and Jepson) examines factors that potentially influence Indigenous labour market outcomes (LMOs). It uses regression analysis, and builds on the simple model that was presented in the ‘Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage: Key Indicators (OID) 2011’, by including additional variables. The analysis uses the 2008 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey (NATSISS), a rich source of information on the characteristics of Indigenous people, including data on LMOs and many factors that might contribute to them. The analysis does not make comparisons with non-Indigenous Australians. Empirical analysis can be used to test and quantify relationships that have been developed in theory. For example, policy makers might be interested in those factors that have the greatest association with Indigenous people’s decisions to participate in the labour market and their success in obtaining a job. The purpose of this analysis is to quantify those associations. The aim is to add variables that represent social and cultural factors to the basic model in the 2011 OID Report to obtain insight into the effects of unobserved personal characteristics, and whether the way Indigenous people engage with their community and culture affects their LMOs. The views expressed in this paper are those of the staff involved and do not necessarily reflect those of the Productivity Commission.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对本地劳动力市场结果的影响
这份工作报告(由Savvas、Boulton和Jepson撰写)研究了可能影响土著劳动力市场结果(LMOs)的因素。它使用回归分析,并在“克服土著劣势:关键指标(OID) 2011”中提出的简单模型的基础上,加入了额外的变量。该分析使用了2008年全国土著和托雷斯海峡岛民社会调查(NATSISS),这是一个关于土著人民特征的丰富信息来源,包括关于lmo的数据和可能导致lmo的许多因素。该分析没有与非土著澳大利亚人进行比较。实证分析可以用来检验和量化已经在理论上发展起来的关系。例如,决策者可能对那些与土著人民参与劳动力市场的决定和他们能否成功获得工作有最大联系的因素感兴趣。本分析的目的是量化这些关联。其目的是将代表社会和文化因素的变量添加到2011年OID报告的基本模型中,以深入了解未被观察到的个人特征的影响,以及土著人民与社区和文化的接触方式是否影响他们的lmo。本文件只代表有关人员的意见,并不一定反映生产力促进委员会的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban Growth Shadows Does Institutional Change in Universities Influence High-Tech Entrepreneurship? Evidence from China’s Project 985 Preferences vs. Opportunities: Racial/Ethnic Intermarriage in the United States Do Employers Use Unemployment as a Sorting Criterion When Hiring? Evidence from a Field Experiment Orderings Based on the Banks Set: Some New Scoring Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1