Turning Doctoral Research Supervision into a Partnership: Towards Promoting Quality Research in African Context

Japheth Noel, S. Kurgat, J. Chang’ach
{"title":"Turning Doctoral Research Supervision into a Partnership: Towards Promoting Quality Research in African Context","authors":"Japheth Noel, S. Kurgat, J. Chang’ach","doi":"10.53103/cjess.v2i2.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The paper establishes different perspectives of doctoral research supervision in African context and the contribution of adopting doctoral research supervision into student-supervisor partnership to enhance the quality of research. Background: Research reveals that the need for doctorates has increased in the 21st century. Whereas it is revealed that research supervision is key throughout the doctoral journey, there is need to establish new and contextual techniques of enhancing doctoral research supervision for quality research in African context. Methodology: The paper adopted a documentary review qualitative approach to establish different perspectives of doctoral research supervision in the African setting. Through the same approach 46 papers were reviewed and it was evident that Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) research supervision need to be an interactive process between doctoral candidates and their supervisors. Contribution: The paper contributes to the current literature on aspects of doctoral research supervision and puts to light the contribution of establishing partnerships in doctoral research supervision towards quality research. Findings: The paper reveals that doctoral education in Africa has been affected with several supervision setbacks ranging from limited human and physical resources to unfavorable supervision practices. Findings, further revealed that incorporation of partnership approach in the supervision journey enhances quality research and output. Recommendations: The paper suggests that universities should regularly revise and update rules, regulations and policies that govern doctoral training and research supervision. Similarly, new interactive research supervision technique of pursuing research supervision as a partnership among doctoral students and supervisors should be adopted for quality research results.","PeriodicalId":270686,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53103/cjess.v2i2.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The paper establishes different perspectives of doctoral research supervision in African context and the contribution of adopting doctoral research supervision into student-supervisor partnership to enhance the quality of research. Background: Research reveals that the need for doctorates has increased in the 21st century. Whereas it is revealed that research supervision is key throughout the doctoral journey, there is need to establish new and contextual techniques of enhancing doctoral research supervision for quality research in African context. Methodology: The paper adopted a documentary review qualitative approach to establish different perspectives of doctoral research supervision in the African setting. Through the same approach 46 papers were reviewed and it was evident that Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) research supervision need to be an interactive process between doctoral candidates and their supervisors. Contribution: The paper contributes to the current literature on aspects of doctoral research supervision and puts to light the contribution of establishing partnerships in doctoral research supervision towards quality research. Findings: The paper reveals that doctoral education in Africa has been affected with several supervision setbacks ranging from limited human and physical resources to unfavorable supervision practices. Findings, further revealed that incorporation of partnership approach in the supervision journey enhances quality research and output. Recommendations: The paper suggests that universities should regularly revise and update rules, regulations and policies that govern doctoral training and research supervision. Similarly, new interactive research supervision technique of pursuing research supervision as a partnership among doctoral students and supervisors should be adopted for quality research results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将博士研究监督转变为伙伴关系:促进非洲环境下的高质量研究
目的:本文建立了非洲背景下博士生研究监督的不同视角,以及将博士生研究监督纳入学生-导师伙伴关系对提高研究质量的贡献。背景:研究表明,21世纪对博士学位的需求有所增加。尽管研究表明研究监督是整个博士旅程的关键,但需要建立新的和情境化的技术来加强非洲背景下的高质量研究的博士研究监督。方法:本文采用文献回顾定性方法,建立非洲环境下博士研究监督的不同视角。通过同样的方法对46篇论文进行了评审,可以看出哲学博士研究指导需要成为博士生和导师之间的互动过程。贡献:本文对博士研究监督方面的现有文献进行了补充,并阐明了在博士研究监督中建立伙伴关系对研究质量的贡献。研究发现:非洲的博士教育受到人力资源和物质资源有限以及不利的监督实践等监管挫折的影响。研究结果进一步表明,在督导过程中加入伙伴关系方法可以提高研究质量和产出。建议:论文建议大学应该定期修订和更新博士生培养和研究监督的规章制度和政策。同样,为了获得高质量的研究成果,应采用博士生与导师合作进行研究督导的新型互动研究督导技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teacher Interaction in Technology- Supported Learning Environment (TSLE): A Social Constructivist Perspective General Practitioner Autism Training and Mandatory Medical Training: A Cross-Sectional Study of GPs’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Investigating English Learning Classes in Kindergartens in Raparin Area Language Theses and Dissertation Landscapes: An Analysis of Research Analyses Development of Cheating Dilemma as a Thought Experiment in Assessing the Student’s Ethical Decision Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1