Criticality Level Assessment From ILI Data

P. Jaya, R. Köck
{"title":"Criticality Level Assessment From ILI Data","authors":"P. Jaya, R. Köck","doi":"10.1115/IPC2018-78750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last 10 years, technical and economical efforts have been made to improve pipeline integrity management. Those efforts focus on developing “searching tools”, capable of identifying pipe mechanical damage due to slow landslides.\n We identified two main tools: geohazard mapping and inline inspection (OCP is using caliper with inertial navigation system INS). The INS system generates a substantial amount of information about pipe’s geometry and deformation, reported as pitch, yaw and distance cover for each run. Since the caliper has been used for years, the pipeline’s path of evolution over the years is already available.\n The INS data was merged with pipeline field inspections to develop an assessment tool based on Machine Learning Technology.\n This tool was applied to the complete path of the pipeline, analyzing each girth weld, thus obtaining a so called “criticality level” for each weld. Two models were evaluated, which differ on the size of the vicinity considered for each girth weld: 250m and 500m. The highest precision model was found with 250m, which already has allowed improvements in field inspections.\n This paper will describe this technique, capable of improving OCP’s pipeline integrity management.","PeriodicalId":273758,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last 10 years, technical and economical efforts have been made to improve pipeline integrity management. Those efforts focus on developing “searching tools”, capable of identifying pipe mechanical damage due to slow landslides. We identified two main tools: geohazard mapping and inline inspection (OCP is using caliper with inertial navigation system INS). The INS system generates a substantial amount of information about pipe’s geometry and deformation, reported as pitch, yaw and distance cover for each run. Since the caliper has been used for years, the pipeline’s path of evolution over the years is already available. The INS data was merged with pipeline field inspections to develop an assessment tool based on Machine Learning Technology. This tool was applied to the complete path of the pipeline, analyzing each girth weld, thus obtaining a so called “criticality level” for each weld. Two models were evaluated, which differ on the size of the vicinity considered for each girth weld: 250m and 500m. The highest precision model was found with 250m, which already has allowed improvements in field inspections. This paper will describe this technique, capable of improving OCP’s pipeline integrity management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ILI数据的临界水平评估
在过去的10年里,人们在技术和经济上都做出了努力来改善管道完整性管理。这些努力的重点是开发“搜索工具”,能够识别由于缓慢滑坡造成的管道机械损伤。我们确定了两种主要工具:地质灾害测绘和在线检查(OCP使用卡尺和惯性导航系统INS)。INS系统可以生成大量关于管柱几何形状和变形的信息,包括每次下入的俯仰、偏航和覆盖距离。由于卡尺已使用多年,管道多年来的演变路径已经可用。INS数据与管道现场检查相结合,开发出基于机器学习技术的评估工具。该工具应用于管道的完整路径,分析每个环焊缝,从而获得每个焊缝的所谓“临界水平”。对两个模型进行了评估,每个环焊缝的邻近区域大小不同:250m和500m。最高精度的模型是在250米处发现的,这已经允许在现场检查中进行改进。本文将对该技术进行描述,能够提高OCP的管道完整性管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Noise Filtering Techniques for the Quantification of Uncertainty in Dent Strain Calculations The Impact of Pressure Fluctuations on the Early Onset of Stage II Growth of High pH Stress Corrosion Crack A Data Driven Validation of a Defect Assessment Model and its Safe Implementation Microwave Chipless Resonator Strain Sensor for Pipeline Safety Monitoring Full-Scale Fatigue Testing of Crack-in-Dent and Framework Development for Life Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1