COMPARISON OF TOOTH DIMENSIONS OF AN ORTHODONTIC PATIENT POPULATION AND A NORMAL POPULATION OF NIGERIANS

Kolawole Kikelomo Adebanke, Owoeye Daniel Temitope, Oginni Adeleke Oke, Oyedare Gideon Abiodun
{"title":"COMPARISON OF TOOTH DIMENSIONS OF AN ORTHODONTIC PATIENT POPULATION AND A NORMAL POPULATION OF NIGERIANS","authors":"Kolawole Kikelomo Adebanke, Owoeye Daniel Temitope, Oginni Adeleke Oke, Oyedare Gideon Abiodun","doi":"10.19177/jrd.v7e4201959-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the tooth dimensions of an orthodontic patient population with a normal population of Nigerians. Materials and Methods: Participants were orthodontic and control populations selected from Obafemi Awolowo Teaching Hospitals Complex Ile-Ife. Selected participants had full eruption of first six permanent teeth in all quadrants, intact dentition and no conservative treatment other than class 1 restorations. The mesio-distal and bucco-lingual widths of teeth were measured with an electronic digital caliper from dental casts. Independent sample t test was used for group comparisons. Statistical significance was inferred at p <  0.05. Results: Mean maxillary and mandibular mesio-distal tooth dimensions were generally larger in the orthodontic than the control population, however, only the dimensions of maxillary central incisors, left lateral incisor and mandibular left second premolar differed significantly (p < 0.05). Mean maxillary bucco-lingual tooth dimensions were significantly larger among the orthodontic than the control population. Mandibular bucco-lingual dimensions differed significantly for the right canine, left first and second premolars, and right and left first molars (p < 0.05). Tooth dimensions were generally larger in male than female participants, however only a few differences reached statistical significance (p < 0.05) Conclusions: Some differences were observed in the mesio-distal tooth dimensions of the orthodontic patients and control patients who participated in this study, especially in relation to the maxillary incisors. Buccolingual tooth dimensions differed significantly between the groups which were more pronounced with the maxillary teeth. Gender differences were observed with some tooth dimensions.","PeriodicalId":213881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19177/jrd.v7e4201959-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the tooth dimensions of an orthodontic patient population with a normal population of Nigerians. Materials and Methods: Participants were orthodontic and control populations selected from Obafemi Awolowo Teaching Hospitals Complex Ile-Ife. Selected participants had full eruption of first six permanent teeth in all quadrants, intact dentition and no conservative treatment other than class 1 restorations. The mesio-distal and bucco-lingual widths of teeth were measured with an electronic digital caliper from dental casts. Independent sample t test was used for group comparisons. Statistical significance was inferred at p <  0.05. Results: Mean maxillary and mandibular mesio-distal tooth dimensions were generally larger in the orthodontic than the control population, however, only the dimensions of maxillary central incisors, left lateral incisor and mandibular left second premolar differed significantly (p < 0.05). Mean maxillary bucco-lingual tooth dimensions were significantly larger among the orthodontic than the control population. Mandibular bucco-lingual dimensions differed significantly for the right canine, left first and second premolars, and right and left first molars (p < 0.05). Tooth dimensions were generally larger in male than female participants, however only a few differences reached statistical significance (p < 0.05) Conclusions: Some differences were observed in the mesio-distal tooth dimensions of the orthodontic patients and control patients who participated in this study, especially in relation to the maxillary incisors. Buccolingual tooth dimensions differed significantly between the groups which were more pronounced with the maxillary teeth. Gender differences were observed with some tooth dimensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚人正畸患者与正常人群牙齿尺寸的比较
目的:本研究的目的是比较正畸患者人群与尼日利亚正常人群的牙齿尺寸。材料和方法:研究对象为来自奥巴费米·阿沃洛沃教学医院Ile-Ife的正畸人群和对照人群。所选的参与者在所有象限的前六颗恒牙完全萌出,牙列完整,除1级修复体外没有其他保守治疗。用电子数字卡尺测量牙模中-远端和颊-舌宽度。组间比较采用独立样本t检验。p < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:正畸组上颌和下颌中远端平均牙尺寸普遍大于对照组,但只有上颌中切牙、左侧侧切牙和下颌左侧第二前磨牙尺寸差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。正畸组平均上颌颊-舌牙尺寸明显大于对照组。右犬齿、左第一和第二前磨牙、右第一和左第一磨牙的下颌颊舌尺寸差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。男性受试者的牙齿尺寸普遍大于女性受试者,但只有少数差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:正畸患者与对照组的中远端牙齿尺寸存在一定差异,尤其是上颌门牙。颊舌牙的尺寸在以上颌牙为主的两组间差异显著。在某些牙齿尺寸上观察到性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF INTRAOPERATIVE PAIN OCCURRENCE AND NEED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ANESTHESIA DURING EMERGENCY DENTAL CARE Quality analysis of four filling techniques in ovoid root canals prepared with M® instruments SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MOLAR INCISOR HYPOMINERALIZATION (MIH) OPACITIES IN FIRST PERMANENT MOLARS Topographic analysis of fiber posts after surface disinfection with different methods Treatment of lingual nerve paresthesia through photobiomodulation therapy: a case report employing an approach integrating extraoral and intraoral modalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1