Laypersons' perceptions of after-death communication

Kelli P. Gariglietti, Julie A. Allison
{"title":"Laypersons' perceptions of after-death communication","authors":"Kelli P. Gariglietti, Julie A. Allison","doi":"10.1080/10811449708414406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigated perceptions of after-death communication (ADC). Because of the anecdotal nature of such experiences, scientific research in this area is restricted to assessing individuals' perceptions of them. Results from this study found that 54% of participants perceived having had some form of an ADC experience. The most common experience of those reporting ADCs was during sleep. Of those reporting ADCs, the majority indicated that ADCs should or should “definitely” be discussed, and that their experience had been a positive one. Religious beliefs were not found to be a significant difference between those who had experienced an ADC and those who had not. Significant differences between those not reporting an ADC and those indicating the possibility of having had such an experience were found on four variables. Those reporting ADCs were more likely to practice relaxation or meditation techniques, held a stronger belief that perceptions of ADCs should be shared with others, were less ...","PeriodicalId":343335,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personal & Interpersonal Loss","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personal & Interpersonal Loss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811449708414406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated perceptions of after-death communication (ADC). Because of the anecdotal nature of such experiences, scientific research in this area is restricted to assessing individuals' perceptions of them. Results from this study found that 54% of participants perceived having had some form of an ADC experience. The most common experience of those reporting ADCs was during sleep. Of those reporting ADCs, the majority indicated that ADCs should or should “definitely” be discussed, and that their experience had been a positive one. Religious beliefs were not found to be a significant difference between those who had experienced an ADC and those who had not. Significant differences between those not reporting an ADC and those indicating the possibility of having had such an experience were found on four variables. Those reporting ADCs were more likely to practice relaxation or meditation techniques, held a stronger belief that perceptions of ADCs should be shared with others, were less ...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外行人对死后沟通的认知
摘要:本研究调查了死后沟通(ADC)的感知。由于这种经历的轶事性质,这一领域的科学研究仅限于评估个人对它们的看法。这项研究的结果发现,54%的参与者认为自己有过某种形式的ADC经历。报告adc的患者最常见的经历是在睡眠期间。在报告adc的国家中,大多数国家表示应该或“绝对”应该讨论adc,它们的经验是积极的。宗教信仰在经历过ADC的人和没有经历过ADC的人之间没有显著差异。在四个变量上发现,未报告ADC的患者和可能有过此类经历的患者之间存在显著差异。那些报告有adc的人更有可能练习放松或冥想技巧,更坚定地认为adc的看法应该与他人分享,更少……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Living With The Facts, Negotiating The Terms: Unrealistic Beliefs, Denial, and Adjustment In The First Year Of Acquired Physical Disability The Relationships among Differing Loss Experiences, Adjustment, Beliefs, and Coping. Attitudes Toward Euthanasia and Justifying Reasons Of Elderly Israelis and Their Family Members Motherloss: An Adult Daughter's Depth Perspective Sawdust for Brains: Definition and Disconfirmation after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1