Corporate Governance in an Emerging Market – What Does the Market Trust?

R. Chakrabarti, Subrata Sarkar
{"title":"Corporate Governance in an Emerging Market – What Does the Market Trust?","authors":"R. Chakrabarti, Subrata Sarkar","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1615960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent corporate governance scandals at the fourth largest software firm in India, Satyam Computers Limited, provide two clean and major corporate governance events, with effects on firms across the board in India (and possibly other emerging market countries). The first instance was a shock about board ineffectiveness on Dec 16, when Satyam’s board approved of an acquisition of two companies – one unlisted – where members of the Chairman’s family were the main entrepreneurs and had majority or complete shareholding; and the second, an accounting shock, occurred on January 7 when it was disclosed that the firm had been fudging its accounts for several years and its much-vaunted $1.2 billion cash holding was largely non-existent and the result of a long-drawn accounting fraud. We analyze the cross-sectional variation in the stock price reactions to these two corporate governance shocks for Indian companies. We relate the firm-specific cumulative abnormal returns on these two dates to different measures of corporate governance to find out the market perception of the validity of these measures. We show that with regard to board effectiveness, i) Board independence matters; ii) the characteristics of the independent directors also have a favorable effect on market reaction: companies with independent directors having more expertise (proxied by number of multiple directorships) do better; iii) institutional holdings have a salutary effect, but only for foreign institutions; iv) board size has a positive effect on market reaction; and v) there is a large discount for companies belonging to business groups. For the second episode, none of the board or audit committee independence related variables are significant, but indicators of quality of audit committee seem to matter. The discount of group companies becomes even more pronounced in this episode. These findings help us identify what variables among those identified by prior research are actually taken into account by investors in an emerging market to assess the corporate governance levels of companies and to what extent they affect valuation.","PeriodicalId":188920,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Managing in Emerging Markets (Topic)","volume":"7 26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Managing in Emerging Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1615960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The recent corporate governance scandals at the fourth largest software firm in India, Satyam Computers Limited, provide two clean and major corporate governance events, with effects on firms across the board in India (and possibly other emerging market countries). The first instance was a shock about board ineffectiveness on Dec 16, when Satyam’s board approved of an acquisition of two companies – one unlisted – where members of the Chairman’s family were the main entrepreneurs and had majority or complete shareholding; and the second, an accounting shock, occurred on January 7 when it was disclosed that the firm had been fudging its accounts for several years and its much-vaunted $1.2 billion cash holding was largely non-existent and the result of a long-drawn accounting fraud. We analyze the cross-sectional variation in the stock price reactions to these two corporate governance shocks for Indian companies. We relate the firm-specific cumulative abnormal returns on these two dates to different measures of corporate governance to find out the market perception of the validity of these measures. We show that with regard to board effectiveness, i) Board independence matters; ii) the characteristics of the independent directors also have a favorable effect on market reaction: companies with independent directors having more expertise (proxied by number of multiple directorships) do better; iii) institutional holdings have a salutary effect, but only for foreign institutions; iv) board size has a positive effect on market reaction; and v) there is a large discount for companies belonging to business groups. For the second episode, none of the board or audit committee independence related variables are significant, but indicators of quality of audit committee seem to matter. The discount of group companies becomes even more pronounced in this episode. These findings help us identify what variables among those identified by prior research are actually taken into account by investors in an emerging market to assess the corporate governance levels of companies and to what extent they affect valuation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新兴市场的公司治理——市场信任什么?
最近发生在印度第四大软件公司萨蒂扬计算机有限公司(Satyam Computers Limited)的公司治理丑闻,提供了两起干净而重大的公司治理事件,对印度(可能还有其他新兴市场国家)的所有公司都产生了影响。第一个例子是12月16日对董事会无能的震惊,当时萨蒂扬董事会批准了对两家公司的收购——其中一家未上市——董事长的家族成员是主要企业家,持有多数或全部股权;第二次是会计冲击,发生在1月7日,当时披露该公司多年来一直在伪造账目,其大肆吹嘘的12亿美元现金持有基本上不存在,而且是长期会计欺诈的结果。我们分析了印度公司对这两种公司治理冲击的股价反应的横截面变化。我们将这两个日期的公司特定累积异常收益与不同的公司治理措施联系起来,以找出市场对这些措施有效性的看法。我们表明,就董事会有效性而言,i)董事会独立性至关重要;(2)独立董事的特点对市场反应也有有利的影响:拥有更多专业知识(由多个董事所代理)的独立董事的公司表现更好;Iii)机构持有具有有益效果,但仅限于外国机构;4)董事会规模对市场反应有正向影响;v)属于商业团体的公司有很大的折扣。对于第二阶段,与董事会或审计委员会独立性相关的变量都不显著,但审计委员会质量指标似乎很重要。集团公司的折扣在这一事件中变得更加明显。这些发现有助于我们确定,在之前的研究中确定的变量中,新兴市场投资者在评估公司治理水平时实际考虑了哪些变量,以及它们在多大程度上影响了估值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Home Country Investor Protection, Ownership Structure and Cross-listed Firms’ Compliance with SOX-mandated Internal Control Deficiency Disclosures Quantifying the ECB’s Interest Rate Smoothing Behavior Currency Risk Exposure of Chinese Corporations Immigration Policies and the Ecuadorian Exodus A Tale of Two Market Microstructures: Spillovers of Informed Trading and Liquidity for Cross Listed Chinese A and B Shares
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1