Writing A Chemistry Education Research Article: Stepping Stone Or Stumbling Block?

S. Fergus
{"title":"Writing A Chemistry Education Research Article: Stepping Stone Or Stumbling Block?","authors":"S. Fergus","doi":"10.29311/NDTPS.V0I12.673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I was invited to write this opinion piece following a presentation at the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) conference on Methods in Education Chemistry Research related to translating creative teaching ideas and innovations into chemistry education research outputs. With a keen interest in learning and teaching and a solid training in organic chemistry research, my choice to combine them both and engage in chemistry education research (CER), seeking the empirical evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness (or not) of classroom or laboratory activities, would seem obvious. My professional journey has been both a stepping-stone, in terms of the positive impact of CER in deepening my pedagogic theory and stretching my ideas, yet it also has been a stumbling block. The perspective from colleagues strongly implied CER to be easier, not to mention “fluffy and vague” compared with traditional chemistry research. My experiences have been quite the contrary. I found CER if anything to be more difficult and challenging. To execute chemistry research, in for example my discipline of organic synthetic, would typically require me to consult the literature, obtain published procedures to synthesise a target compound or intermediate products and then to identify the chemicals required. I can assume that the chemicals used will react in a similar way to the published procedure. This however, cannot be assumed in education; replication is not guaranteed. An effective classroom activity with my undergraduate students or a successful doctoral research supervision strategy may not work effectively with all students in all contexts. I will outline the common pitfalls to avoid in CER, the first step in planning high quality CER and hopefully offer some reassurances that, although the transition to CER may feel like starting again within a new research discipline, it does not need to be daunting. Although my experience is in CER most of what I write here will be applicable across the disciplines in higher education.","PeriodicalId":174795,"journal":{"name":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29311/NDTPS.V0I12.673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I was invited to write this opinion piece following a presentation at the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) conference on Methods in Education Chemistry Research related to translating creative teaching ideas and innovations into chemistry education research outputs. With a keen interest in learning and teaching and a solid training in organic chemistry research, my choice to combine them both and engage in chemistry education research (CER), seeking the empirical evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness (or not) of classroom or laboratory activities, would seem obvious. My professional journey has been both a stepping-stone, in terms of the positive impact of CER in deepening my pedagogic theory and stretching my ideas, yet it also has been a stumbling block. The perspective from colleagues strongly implied CER to be easier, not to mention “fluffy and vague” compared with traditional chemistry research. My experiences have been quite the contrary. I found CER if anything to be more difficult and challenging. To execute chemistry research, in for example my discipline of organic synthetic, would typically require me to consult the literature, obtain published procedures to synthesise a target compound or intermediate products and then to identify the chemicals required. I can assume that the chemicals used will react in a similar way to the published procedure. This however, cannot be assumed in education; replication is not guaranteed. An effective classroom activity with my undergraduate students or a successful doctoral research supervision strategy may not work effectively with all students in all contexts. I will outline the common pitfalls to avoid in CER, the first step in planning high quality CER and hopefully offer some reassurances that, although the transition to CER may feel like starting again within a new research discipline, it does not need to be daunting. Although my experience is in CER most of what I write here will be applicable across the disciplines in higher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
写化学教育研究论文:垫脚石还是绊脚石?
在英国皇家化学学会(RSC)关于将创造性教学理念和创新转化为化学教育研究成果的教育化学研究方法会议上,我应邀撰写了这篇评论文章。我对学与教有着浓厚的兴趣,在有机化学研究方面也受过扎实的训练,所以我选择将两者结合起来,从事化学教育研究(CER),寻求实证证据来证明课堂或实验室活动的有效性(或无效),这似乎是显而易见的。从CER对我的教学理论的深化和思想的拓展的积极影响来看,我的专业之旅既是一块踏脚石,也是一块绊脚石。同事们的观点强烈暗示,与传统的化学研究相比,CER更容易,更不用说“蓬松和模糊”了。我的经历恰恰相反。我发现CER更有难度和挑战性。要进行化学研究,例如,在我的有机合成学科中,通常需要我查阅文献,获得合成目标化合物或中间产品的公开程序,然后确定所需的化学物质。我可以假设使用的化学物质会以与公布的程序类似的方式发生反应。然而,这在教育中是不能假设的;不能保证复制。对本科生有效的课堂活动或成功的博士研究指导策略可能并不适用于所有情境下的所有学生。我将概述在CER中要避免的常见陷阱,这是规划高质量CER的第一步,并希望提供一些保证,尽管过渡到CER可能感觉像是在一个新的研究学科中重新开始,但它并不需要令人生畏。虽然我的经历是在CER,但我在这里写的大部分内容将适用于高等教育的各个学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Career Preparedness of Chemistry Graduates Challenges and Opportunities for Online Practical Work in Sub-Saharan Africa Student perspectives on online lectures during the Covid-19 lockdown Supporting student collaboration in online breakout rooms through interactive group activities Improving Graduate Futures and Employability Through Embedded Industrial Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1