A short remark on Gödel incompleteness theorem and its self-referential paradox from Neutrosophic Logic perspective

V. Christianto, F. Smarandache
{"title":"A short remark on Gödel incompleteness theorem and its self-referential paradox from Neutrosophic Logic perspective","authors":"V. Christianto, F. Smarandache","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.3908371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is known from history of mathematics, that Gödel submitted his two incompleteness theorems, which can be considered as one of hallmarks of modern mathematics in 20th century. Here we argue that Gödel incompleteness theorem and its self-referential paradox have not only put Hilbert’s axiomatic program into question, but he also opened up the problem deep inside the then popular Aristotelian Logic. Although there were some attempts to go beyond Aristotelian binary logic, including by Lukasiewicz’s three-valued logic, here we argue that the problem of self-referential paradox can be seen as reconcilable and solvable from Neutrosophic Logic perspective. Motivation of this paper: These authors are motivated to re-describe the self-referential paradox inherent in Godel incompleteness theorem. Contribution: This paper will show how Neutrosophic Logic offers a unique perspective and solution to Godel incompleteness theorem.","PeriodicalId":192295,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neutrosophic Science","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neutrosophic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3908371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is known from history of mathematics, that Gödel submitted his two incompleteness theorems, which can be considered as one of hallmarks of modern mathematics in 20th century. Here we argue that Gödel incompleteness theorem and its self-referential paradox have not only put Hilbert’s axiomatic program into question, but he also opened up the problem deep inside the then popular Aristotelian Logic. Although there were some attempts to go beyond Aristotelian binary logic, including by Lukasiewicz’s three-valued logic, here we argue that the problem of self-referential paradox can be seen as reconcilable and solvable from Neutrosophic Logic perspective. Motivation of this paper: These authors are motivated to re-describe the self-referential paradox inherent in Godel incompleteness theorem. Contribution: This paper will show how Neutrosophic Logic offers a unique perspective and solution to Godel incompleteness theorem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性逻辑视域下对Gödel不完备定理及其自指悖论的评述
从数学发展史上可以看出,Gödel提出了他的两个不完备定理,这两个定理被认为是20世纪现代数学的标志之一。本文认为Gödel不完备定理及其自我参照悖论不仅使希尔伯特的公理化程序受到质疑,而且还揭示了当时流行的亚里士多德逻辑的深层问题。虽然有一些超越亚里士多德二元逻辑的尝试,包括卢卡西耶维奇的三值逻辑,但我们认为,从中性逻辑的角度来看,自我参照悖论的问题是可以调和和解决的。本文的动机:这些作者的动机是重新描述哥德尔不完备定理中固有的自我参照悖论。贡献:本文将展示中性逻辑如何为哥德尔不完备定理提供一个独特的视角和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unveiling an Innovative Approach to Q-Complex Neutrosophic Soft Rings A Note on Invertible Neutrosophic Square Matrices Selection of neutral networks using q-rung neutrosophic vague soft set TOPSIS aggregating operator setting multi-criteria group decision making Polynomial ideals of a ring based on neutrosophic sets SEE Transform in Difference Equations and Differential-Difference Equations Compared With Neutrosophic Difference Equations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1