The efficacy of combined Albendazole and Praziquantel therapy versus Albendazole monotherapy in treatment of parenchymal neurocysticercosis: A systematic review

G. Nepal, J. Rehrig, Rajan Sharma Kandel, Shaik Tanveer Ahamad, Bipin Kandel, R. Ojha, J. Yadav, Sujan Jamarkattel, R. Shah, Jeevan Gautam, G. Shrestha
{"title":"The efficacy of combined Albendazole and Praziquantel therapy versus Albendazole monotherapy in treatment of parenchymal neurocysticercosis: A systematic review","authors":"G. Nepal, J. Rehrig, Rajan Sharma Kandel, Shaik Tanveer Ahamad, Bipin Kandel, R. Ojha, J. Yadav, Sujan Jamarkattel, R. Shah, Jeevan Gautam, G. Shrestha","doi":"10.3126/jaim.v10i2.38477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preliminary studies suggest combined albendazole and praziquantel (ABZ+PZQ) therapy has superior anti-parasitic effect compared to albendazole (ABZ) or praziquantel (PZQ) monotherapy, due to potential pharmacokinetic synergism. We thus present an evidence-based review evaluating the risks and benefits associated with combination ABZ+PZQ therapy compared to standard ABZ monotherapy in the treatment of viable parenchymal Neurocysticercosis (NCC). Our systematic review is based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta- Analysis) statement. Our primary outcome measure was to compare the efficacy of ABZ+PZQ with ABZ alone for treatment of NCC. Efficacy was determined based on clinical and radiographic evaluation. The secondary outcome measured the incidence of adverse effects in each treatment group. Literature search yielded a total of 120 articles. After excluding duplicates and those not meeting inclusion criteria, five papers were reviewed for data collection. Medication regimens, number of cyst, patient age, and location varied amongst included papers. The combination therapy resulted in significant symptom and cyst resolution in patients with more than two viable parenchymal cysts as compared to monotherapy. The two treatment arms were comparable in treating NCC with low cyst burden. There was no significant difference in the adverse effects between two treatment groups. In individuals with multi-cystic NCC, the patients who received dual therapy had better outcomes than those who received ABZ monotherapy as evidenced by radiographic improvement and reduced seizure episodes. The adverse effect profile in patients receiving dual therapy was similar and comparable to those with monotherapy.","PeriodicalId":374721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jaim.v10i2.38477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preliminary studies suggest combined albendazole and praziquantel (ABZ+PZQ) therapy has superior anti-parasitic effect compared to albendazole (ABZ) or praziquantel (PZQ) monotherapy, due to potential pharmacokinetic synergism. We thus present an evidence-based review evaluating the risks and benefits associated with combination ABZ+PZQ therapy compared to standard ABZ monotherapy in the treatment of viable parenchymal Neurocysticercosis (NCC). Our systematic review is based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta- Analysis) statement. Our primary outcome measure was to compare the efficacy of ABZ+PZQ with ABZ alone for treatment of NCC. Efficacy was determined based on clinical and radiographic evaluation. The secondary outcome measured the incidence of adverse effects in each treatment group. Literature search yielded a total of 120 articles. After excluding duplicates and those not meeting inclusion criteria, five papers were reviewed for data collection. Medication regimens, number of cyst, patient age, and location varied amongst included papers. The combination therapy resulted in significant symptom and cyst resolution in patients with more than two viable parenchymal cysts as compared to monotherapy. The two treatment arms were comparable in treating NCC with low cyst burden. There was no significant difference in the adverse effects between two treatment groups. In individuals with multi-cystic NCC, the patients who received dual therapy had better outcomes than those who received ABZ monotherapy as evidenced by radiographic improvement and reduced seizure episodes. The adverse effect profile in patients receiving dual therapy was similar and comparable to those with monotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿苯达唑与吡喹酮联合治疗与阿苯达唑单药治疗实质性神经囊虫病疗效的系统评价
初步研究表明,由于潜在的药代动力学协同作用,阿苯达唑与吡喹酮(ABZ+PZQ)联合治疗比阿苯达唑(ABZ)或吡喹酮(PZQ)单药治疗具有更好的抗寄生虫效果。因此,我们提出了一项基于证据的综述,评估与标准ABZ单药治疗相比,ABZ+PZQ联合治疗活动性实质性神经囊虫病(NCC)的风险和益处。我们的系统评价是基于PRISMA(首选报告项目为系统评价和荟萃分析)的声明。我们的主要结局指标是比较ABZ+PZQ与ABZ单独治疗NCC的疗效。根据临床和影像学评价确定疗效。次要结局测量了每个治疗组的不良反应发生率。文献检索共获得120篇文章。在排除重复和不符合纳入标准后,对5篇论文进行数据收集。药物治疗方案、囊肿数量、患者年龄和位置在纳入的论文中有所不同。与单药治疗相比,联合治疗对两个以上可存活的实质囊肿患者有显著的症状和囊肿消退。两个治疗组在治疗低囊肿负担的NCC方面具有可比性。两组间不良反应无显著差异。在患有多囊性NCC的个体中,接受双重治疗的患者比接受ABZ单药治疗的患者有更好的结果,这可以通过影像学改善和癫痫发作减少来证明。接受双重治疗的患者的不良反应与接受单一治疗的患者相似且相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A rare case of single coronary artery with congenital absence of right coronary artery Anaphylactic reaction after intravenous injection of ketorolac for colicky pain: a case report and literature review Incidence of new onset arrhythmia after non cardiac surgery Clinical Profile of End Stage Renal Disease Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Nepal A study on demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of severe acute pancreatitis in a tertiary-level intensive care unit in Nepal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1