Is the quantity-quality trade-off in call centres a false dichotomy?

Benjamin P. W. Ellway
{"title":"Is the quantity-quality trade-off in call centres a false dichotomy?","authors":"Benjamin P. W. Ellway","doi":"10.1108/MSQ-09-2013-0192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the existing conceptualisation of quantity and quality in call centres as conflicting or contradictory, and through qualitative analysis, demonstrate that quantity and quality may not necessarily operate as a trade-off. Design/methodology/approach – Existing literature is reviewed to show how quantity-quality has been conceptualised to date, followed by an analysis of quantity-quality manifestations based upon an in-depth field study of work and service in a large and complex call centre operation. Advisors’ work practices were observed during their interactions with customers, which provided rich insights into the nature of live calls and service provision in 13 different teams, supplemented with informal semi-structured interviews with team managers, coaches, and centre managers. Findings – The paper demonstrates that quantity and quality operate as a trade-off when the unit of analysis is the individual advisor or individual call fragment. However, if t...","PeriodicalId":313036,"journal":{"name":"Managing Service Quality","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Service Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-09-2013-0192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the existing conceptualisation of quantity and quality in call centres as conflicting or contradictory, and through qualitative analysis, demonstrate that quantity and quality may not necessarily operate as a trade-off. Design/methodology/approach – Existing literature is reviewed to show how quantity-quality has been conceptualised to date, followed by an analysis of quantity-quality manifestations based upon an in-depth field study of work and service in a large and complex call centre operation. Advisors’ work practices were observed during their interactions with customers, which provided rich insights into the nature of live calls and service provision in 13 different teams, supplemented with informal semi-structured interviews with team managers, coaches, and centre managers. Findings – The paper demonstrates that quantity and quality operate as a trade-off when the unit of analysis is the individual advisor or individual call fragment. However, if t...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼叫中心的数量-质量权衡是错误的二分法吗?
目的-本文的目的是检查呼叫中心数量和质量的现有概念是冲突或矛盾的,并通过定性分析,证明数量和质量不一定是一种权衡。设计/方法/方法-回顾现有文献,以展示迄今为止如何将数量-质量概念化,然后基于对大型复杂呼叫中心运营中的工作和服务的深入实地研究,分析数量-质量表现。在与客户互动的过程中观察顾问的工作实践,这为13个不同团队的实时呼叫和服务提供的性质提供了丰富的见解,并辅以与团队经理、教练和中心经理的非正式半结构化访谈。研究结果-本文表明,当分析单元是单个顾问或单个呼叫片段时,数量和质量作为一种权衡。然而,如果……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing complexity and taking a systemic view in service research Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic The collective consumption network Beyond virtuality: from engagement platforms to engagement ecosystems Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1