Assessing the degree of preservation of landscape, natural and cultural–historical values in river dike reinforcement planning in the Netherlands

H. Lenders, M. Huijbregts, Bram G. W. Aarts, C. Turnhout
{"title":"Assessing the degree of preservation of landscape, natural and cultural–historical values in river dike reinforcement planning in the Netherlands","authors":"H. Lenders, M. Huijbregts, Bram G. W. Aarts, C. Turnhout","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199907/08)15:4<325::AID-RRR545>3.0.CO;2-G","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dutch river district is highly valued for its landscape, natural and cultural–historical elements (also called LNC values). According to the current Dutch policy on river dike reinforcements, these values should be safeguarded in planning and executing river dike reinforcement projects by following the ‘selective smart design strategy’. This paper presents an audit model, consisting of 20 modules, assessing the extent to which LNC values are taken into account in the planning process. The model was tested on eight projects and appeared to fit the objectives very well. The assignment of weighting constants used to interconnect the individual modules, however, would be improved if all parties involved could achieve consensus on this issue. The test results showed that in five of the eight projects examined, LNC values were sufficiently taken into consideration. Aspects that were insufficiently taken into account concerned, in particular, fauna surveys, valuation of LNC elements and effects valuation. Moreover, LNC values were often restored or compensated for, rather than preserved. Large differences were found between individual river dike reinforcement projects. The method can also be applied in river dike reinforcement plans in other countries. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"2008 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199907/08)15:4<325::AID-RRR545>3.0.CO;2-G","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The Dutch river district is highly valued for its landscape, natural and cultural–historical elements (also called LNC values). According to the current Dutch policy on river dike reinforcements, these values should be safeguarded in planning and executing river dike reinforcement projects by following the ‘selective smart design strategy’. This paper presents an audit model, consisting of 20 modules, assessing the extent to which LNC values are taken into account in the planning process. The model was tested on eight projects and appeared to fit the objectives very well. The assignment of weighting constants used to interconnect the individual modules, however, would be improved if all parties involved could achieve consensus on this issue. The test results showed that in five of the eight projects examined, LNC values were sufficiently taken into consideration. Aspects that were insufficiently taken into account concerned, in particular, fauna surveys, valuation of LNC elements and effects valuation. Moreover, LNC values were often restored or compensated for, rather than preserved. Large differences were found between individual river dike reinforcement projects. The method can also be applied in river dike reinforcement plans in other countries. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估荷兰河堤加固规划中对景观、自然和文化历史价值的保护程度
荷兰河区因其景观、自然和文化历史元素(也称为LNC价值)而受到高度重视。根据目前荷兰政策河坝增援部队,这些值应该在计划和执行维护河流堤防加固工程按照“选择性智能设计策略”。本文提出了一个由20个模块组成的审计模型,评估在规划过程中考虑到LNC值的程度。该模型在八个项目上进行了测试,似乎非常符合目标。但是,如果有关各方能够就这一问题达成协商一致意见,则用于连接各个模块的权重常数的分配将得到改进。测试结果表明,在8个项目中,有5个项目充分考虑了LNC值。没有充分考虑到的方面,特别是动物群调查、低成本要素的评估和影响评估。此外,LNC值经常被恢复或补偿,而不是保留。个别河堤加固工程之间存在较大差异。该方法也可应用于其他国家的河堤加固方案。版权所有©1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contrasting temperatures, waterflows, and light: seasonal habitat selection by young Atlantic salmon and brown trout in a boreonemoral river Flow management strategies to control blooms of the cyanobacterium, Anabaena circinalis, in the River Murray at Morgan, south Australia Use of mesohabitat‐specific relationships between flow velocity and river discharge to assess invertebrate minimum flow requirements Patterns of species richness and introduced species in native freshwater fish faunas of a Mediterranean‐type basin: the Guadiana River (southwest Iberian Peninsula) Effects of habitat enhancement on 0‐group fishes in a lowland river
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1