Can Positive Entrepreneurship Policies Always Improve Social Welfare?

Xiang Li, Yan Xu
{"title":"Can Positive Entrepreneurship Policies Always Improve Social Welfare?","authors":"Xiang Li, Yan Xu","doi":"10.21078/JSSI-2020-148-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The entrepreneurship has positive and significant connection with economic growth. Competition would be increased by new entrants in the market; then, social welfare would be improved. Thus, positive entrepreneurship policies are often linked to increased social welfare by authorities. In this paper, we focus on a certain case where potential entrepreneurs are employees of existing firms to test the above ideas. The purpose of our research is to assess the variation of social welfare in the context of employer-restricted separation. Therefore, the model of Cournot competition where employees constitute the only entry threat was used in this paper. The results demonstrate that social welfare would not always be improved even in a good entrepreneurial context. If the deterring strategy is present, the relationship between positive entrepreneurship policies and increased social welfare might not hold, or would depend on the different strategies adopted by the incumbent. Therefore, the sustainability of a positive entrepreneurship policy would be impaired by incumbent firms.","PeriodicalId":258223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems Science and Information","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems Science and Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21078/JSSI-2020-148-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The entrepreneurship has positive and significant connection with economic growth. Competition would be increased by new entrants in the market; then, social welfare would be improved. Thus, positive entrepreneurship policies are often linked to increased social welfare by authorities. In this paper, we focus on a certain case where potential entrepreneurs are employees of existing firms to test the above ideas. The purpose of our research is to assess the variation of social welfare in the context of employer-restricted separation. Therefore, the model of Cournot competition where employees constitute the only entry threat was used in this paper. The results demonstrate that social welfare would not always be improved even in a good entrepreneurial context. If the deterring strategy is present, the relationship between positive entrepreneurship policies and increased social welfare might not hold, or would depend on the different strategies adopted by the incumbent. Therefore, the sustainability of a positive entrepreneurship policy would be impaired by incumbent firms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极的创业政策总是能改善社会福利吗?
企业家精神与经济增长具有显著的正相关关系。市场的新进入者将加剧竞争;这样,社会福利就会得到改善。因此,积极的创业政策往往与当局增加的社会福利联系在一起。在本文中,我们着眼于一个特定的案例,其中潜在的企业家是现有企业的员工来验证上述观点。我们的研究目的是评估雇主限制离职背景下社会福利的变化。因此,本文采用员工构成唯一进入威胁的古诺竞争模型。结果表明,即使在良好的创业环境中,社会福利也不会总是得到改善。如果存在威慑战略,那么积极创业政策和增加社会福利之间的关系可能不成立,或者取决于现任者采取的不同战略。因此,积极创业政策的可持续性将受到现有公司的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Annotation and Joint Extraction of Scientific Entities and Relationships in NSFC Project Texts Design and Selection of Pharmaceutical Innovation Incentive Policies: Subsidy or Inclusion in Health Insurance Plan Pricing Decision of E-Commerce Supply Chains with Return and Online Review of Product Quality Does Gender Affect Travelers' Intention to Use New Energy Autonomous Vehicles? Evidence from Beijing City, China Analysis of the Pull Effect of Local Government Special-Purpose Bond Investment on Economic Growth Under the Input-Output Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1