On reducing bias at high return levels for extreme value analysis

C.-H. Wang
{"title":"On reducing bias at high return levels for extreme value analysis","authors":"C.-H. Wang","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.wang111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Estimates of extremal return levels at high average recurrence intervals (ARIs) are strongly dependent on the shape parameter of the statistical model. Because of scarcity in occurrences, however, many existing extremal data span only a few decades, often resulting in large bias and uncertainty in the estimated shape parameter of the extreme hazard model. This in turn leads to unreliable predicted extreme values at high ARIs. A common approach to ameliorate this shortcoming is the ‘super-station’ (or station-year) approach which extends the length of record and should reduce the uncertainty in high ARIs. However, the problem of predicted bias remains for return levels beyond the record length of the super-station. This paper illustrates a statistical method that provides a mechanism to obtain a hazard model that produces return levels at high ARIs with reduced bias. For an ensemble of independently collected records from a number of observational sites, the method makes use of the maximum recorded value of each of the extremal data of the ensemble, as shown in Figure 1 as the starred points (green points represent synoptic and red points non-synoptic wind gusts). The logarithmically transformed probability of the maximum recorded value at a site is shown to follow the Gumbel (Type I extreme-value) distribution, therefore multiple, say m , sites provide a sample of size m transformed probabilities of extreme values, each from a distinct site. The sample can be treated as being drawn from a Gumbel distribution, irrespective of the underlying hazard-generating mechanisms or the statistical hazard models. The method is demonstrated by an analysis of the extreme wind gust data in South Australia. The results are compared to the specifications in the Australian standard AS/NZS 1170.2:2021 and indicates that the standard may have overestimated the wind gust hazard, hence the specified design wind speeds may fall on the conservative side for South Australia.","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.wang111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Estimates of extremal return levels at high average recurrence intervals (ARIs) are strongly dependent on the shape parameter of the statistical model. Because of scarcity in occurrences, however, many existing extremal data span only a few decades, often resulting in large bias and uncertainty in the estimated shape parameter of the extreme hazard model. This in turn leads to unreliable predicted extreme values at high ARIs. A common approach to ameliorate this shortcoming is the ‘super-station’ (or station-year) approach which extends the length of record and should reduce the uncertainty in high ARIs. However, the problem of predicted bias remains for return levels beyond the record length of the super-station. This paper illustrates a statistical method that provides a mechanism to obtain a hazard model that produces return levels at high ARIs with reduced bias. For an ensemble of independently collected records from a number of observational sites, the method makes use of the maximum recorded value of each of the extremal data of the ensemble, as shown in Figure 1 as the starred points (green points represent synoptic and red points non-synoptic wind gusts). The logarithmically transformed probability of the maximum recorded value at a site is shown to follow the Gumbel (Type I extreme-value) distribution, therefore multiple, say m , sites provide a sample of size m transformed probabilities of extreme values, each from a distinct site. The sample can be treated as being drawn from a Gumbel distribution, irrespective of the underlying hazard-generating mechanisms or the statistical hazard models. The method is demonstrated by an analysis of the extreme wind gust data in South Australia. The results are compared to the specifications in the Australian standard AS/NZS 1170.2:2021 and indicates that the standard may have overestimated the wind gust hazard, hence the specified design wind speeds may fall on the conservative side for South Australia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于在极值分析的高回报水平上减少偏差
在高平均复发间隔(ARIs)的极端回报水平的估计强烈地依赖于统计模型的形状参数。然而,由于事件发生的稀缺性,许多现有的极端数据跨度只有几十年,往往导致极端灾害模型的形状参数估计偏差大,不确定。这反过来又导致在高ARIs时预测的极值不可靠。改善这一缺点的一种常用方法是“超级站”(或站年)方法,该方法延长了记录的长度,并应减少高ARIs的不确定性。然而,对于超过超级台站记录长度的返回水平,预测偏差的问题仍然存在。本文说明了一种统计方法,该方法提供了一种机制,以获得在高ARIs下产生低偏差回报水平的风险模型。对于由多个观测站点独立收集的记录组成的集合,该方法利用集合中每个极值数据的最大记录值,如图1所示作为星号点(绿色点代表天气性阵风,红色点代表非天气性阵风)。一个站点上最大记录值的对数变换概率显示为遵循Gumbel(类型I极值)分布,因此,多个站点,例如m,提供了大小为m的极值变换概率的样本,每个站点来自不同的站点。无论潜在的危险产生机制或统计危险模型如何,样本都可以被视为是从甘贝尔分布中抽取的。通过对南澳极端阵风资料的分析,验证了该方法的有效性。结果与澳大利亚标准AS/NZS 1170.2:2021中的规范进行了比较,表明该标准可能高估了阵风危害,因此规定的设计风速可能落在南澳大利亚的保守方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling of the activated sludge process with a stratified settling unit Recent changes in the water and ecological condition at the arid Tarim River Basin A study on internal observation of vertical protective nets of temporary structures using image processing techniques Developing synthetic datasets for reef modelling Modelling hydrological impact of remotely sensed vegetation change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1