The Relationship between Mainstream and Movement Parties in Taiwan

Tommy Chung-yin Kwan, D. Fell
{"title":"The Relationship between Mainstream and Movement Parties in Taiwan","authors":"Tommy Chung-yin Kwan, D. Fell","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since democratization began in the mid-1980s, Taiwan’s party system\n has been dominated by two parties, the Kuomintang (KMT) and the\n Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). However, smaller parties have at\n times played an important role, bringing diversity into the system, stressing\n different issues and representing neglected communities. These small\n parties tended to be those that split off from the mainstream parties,\n while alternative social movement parties struggled to be electorally\n relevant. The picture changed recently with the rise of two different types\n of movement parties, the New Power Party (NPP) and the Green Party\n Taiwan/Social Democratic Party Alliance (GPT/SDP). In this chapter\n we examine the relationship of these new players with the mainstream\n party, DPP, offering some thoughts on how the relationship affected the\n development of these alternative parties.","PeriodicalId":148986,"journal":{"name":"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Society and the State in Democratic East Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12sdvjk.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since democratization began in the mid-1980s, Taiwan’s party system has been dominated by two parties, the Kuomintang (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). However, smaller parties have at times played an important role, bringing diversity into the system, stressing different issues and representing neglected communities. These small parties tended to be those that split off from the mainstream parties, while alternative social movement parties struggled to be electorally relevant. The picture changed recently with the rise of two different types of movement parties, the New Power Party (NPP) and the Green Party Taiwan/Social Democratic Party Alliance (GPT/SDP). In this chapter we examine the relationship of these new players with the mainstream party, DPP, offering some thoughts on how the relationship affected the development of these alternative parties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台湾主流政党与运动政党之关系
然而,较小的政党有时也发挥了重要作用,使选举系统多样化,强调不同的问题,代表被忽视的社区。这些小党往往是从主流政党中分裂出来的,而其他社会运动政党则努力在选举中发挥作用。随着两种不同类型的运动政党——新力量党(NPP)和绿党台湾/社会民主党联盟(GPT/SDP)的崛起,情况发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter 8. New Immigration, Civic Activism and Identity in Japan. Influencing the ‘Strong’ State 9. Japanese NPOs and the State Re-examined. Reflections Eighteen Years On Index List of Illustrations and Tables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1