An exploratory critical theoretical review of the structure of the ongoing theoretical flow of the management — Functions

Kulkarni Vaibhav Mukund
{"title":"An exploratory critical theoretical review of the structure of the ongoing theoretical flow of the management — Functions","authors":"Kulkarni Vaibhav Mukund","doi":"10.1109/ICDMAI.2017.8073511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It's an exploratory review study, based on testing the hypothesis concerned. The statuesque is already in the existence in the form of the established theories and side of hypothesis need not to be researched again separately, considering it as the prior work referred. That was not a part of this study, this study is a further episode of the same series of research. Operations management was limited to some of the functional areas or domains of management & now it is expanding in the scope to some more functional areas. It does not look limited to any specific functional area or areas of management, rather_is becoming now in practice, gradually. & seems likely to become, fully, as a common function of the management, like the functions from planning to control, & similarly looks necessary to be accepted, in theory too. It seems to be neither mere a functional area, nor mere a common factor among some of the functional areas only, but clicks as a common function of management, as it is getting spread, which may be needed to be recognized now theoretically too. Operation function too has been pervaded like every other function, by the different other functions of management. Every function of management requires separate plans respectively. Organising also pervades different other functions of management and also required controlling as the planning requires. That's why, the apparent flowing' function's similarity with & influence by 1st 2 functions of the management, planning & organising, might not been needed to be a reason to deny the possibility of it's existence as a separate function of management or administration. Thus the ‘flow-process’ or operations seems not just as a separate ‘functional-area’ like manufacturing, but seems a function of management like planning etc. which may pervade some or all the functional areas of management, like Marketing, HRM, Finance, Production, Research, Office & IT etc.","PeriodicalId":368507,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Data Management, Analytics and Innovation (ICDMAI)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Data Management, Analytics and Innovation (ICDMAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMAI.2017.8073511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It's an exploratory review study, based on testing the hypothesis concerned. The statuesque is already in the existence in the form of the established theories and side of hypothesis need not to be researched again separately, considering it as the prior work referred. That was not a part of this study, this study is a further episode of the same series of research. Operations management was limited to some of the functional areas or domains of management & now it is expanding in the scope to some more functional areas. It does not look limited to any specific functional area or areas of management, rather_is becoming now in practice, gradually. & seems likely to become, fully, as a common function of the management, like the functions from planning to control, & similarly looks necessary to be accepted, in theory too. It seems to be neither mere a functional area, nor mere a common factor among some of the functional areas only, but clicks as a common function of management, as it is getting spread, which may be needed to be recognized now theoretically too. Operation function too has been pervaded like every other function, by the different other functions of management. Every function of management requires separate plans respectively. Organising also pervades different other functions of management and also required controlling as the planning requires. That's why, the apparent flowing' function's similarity with & influence by 1st 2 functions of the management, planning & organising, might not been needed to be a reason to deny the possibility of it's existence as a separate function of management or administration. Thus the ‘flow-process’ or operations seems not just as a separate ‘functional-area’ like manufacturing, but seems a function of management like planning etc. which may pervade some or all the functional areas of management, like Marketing, HRM, Finance, Production, Research, Office & IT etc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对正在进行的管理职能理论流结构的探索性批判性理论回顾
这是一项探索性回顾研究,基于对相关假设的检验。雕像已经以既定的理论和假设的形式存在,不需要再单独研究,将其视为先前的工作。这不是本研究的一部分,本研究是同一系列研究的进一步研究。运营管理过去仅限于管理的某些职能领域或领域,现在它的范围正在扩大到更多的职能领域。它看起来并不局限于任何特定的职能领域或管理领域,而是正在逐步付诸实践。似乎有可能完全成为管理的一项共同职能,就像从计划到控制的职能一样,同样,在理论上看来也是必须被接受的。它似乎不仅仅是一个功能领域,也不仅仅是一些功能领域的共同因素,而是作为一种管理的共同功能,随着它的传播,现在可能需要从理论上认识到这一点。经营职能也像其他职能一样,被其他不同的管理职能所渗透。每一项管理职能都需要分别制定单独的计划。组织也渗透到其他不同的管理职能中,并且也需要按照计划的要求进行控制。这就是为什么,表面上的流动功能与管理的前两个功能,计划和组织的相似性和影响,可能不需要成为否认它作为一个独立的管理或行政功能存在的可能性的理由。因此,“流程”或运营似乎不只是像制造业那样单独的“功能领域”,而是像计划等一样的管理功能,可能渗透到管理的部分或所有功能领域,如营销,人力资源管理,财务,生产,研究,办公室和IT等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Keynote speakers The impact of corporate governance and firm performance on chief executive officer's compensation: Evidence from central state owned enterprises in India A novel method for evaluating intercept factor of solar line concentrator system Process trees & service chains can serve us to mitigate zero day attacks better Factors influencing herding behavior among Indian stock investors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1