4. Affirmative Action in the Soviet East, 1923-1932

{"title":"4. Affirmative Action in the Soviet East, 1923-1932","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501713323-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, when Edward Said has turned \"orientalism\" into a universalIy recognized term and the inspiration for a burgeoning scholarly industry, nothing seems to us more characteristic of colonialism than the division of humankind into the arbitrary, essentialized, and hierarchical categories of east and west. It therefore seems odd that the Soviet Union, whose nationalities policy was explicitly formulated as a decolonizing measure, would not reject those categories and instead affirm the unity of mankind. In one sense, they did. The Bolsheviks' Marxist sociology led them to repudiate east and west as racial categories and to deny any long-term differences in the economic, social, or political capacities of alI nationalities. However, the east/west dichotomy was nevertheless preserved as a cultural distinction (one that could at times contain much of the content of the old racial divide). This was not, in fact, surprising. Indeed, nothing better illustrates the way in which the Affirmative Action Empire preserved imperial categories, while reversing their policy implications, than the maintenance and systematization of colonialism's east/west dichotomy. Since this division did in fact influence policy implementation, my analysis of korenizatsiia has likewise preserved this old dichotomy. In Chapter 3, 1 undertook a case study of linguistic korenizatsiia in Ukraine, which was the most important policy in the Soviet \"west.\" In this chapter, 1 analyze the most important policy in the Soviet \"east\": Affirmative Action, the practice of granting ·preferences to non-Russians in admissions, hiring, and promotion in education, industry, and government.1","PeriodicalId":144494,"journal":{"name":"The Affirmative Action Empire","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Affirmative Action Empire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501713323-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, when Edward Said has turned "orientalism" into a universalIy recognized term and the inspiration for a burgeoning scholarly industry, nothing seems to us more characteristic of colonialism than the division of humankind into the arbitrary, essentialized, and hierarchical categories of east and west. It therefore seems odd that the Soviet Union, whose nationalities policy was explicitly formulated as a decolonizing measure, would not reject those categories and instead affirm the unity of mankind. In one sense, they did. The Bolsheviks' Marxist sociology led them to repudiate east and west as racial categories and to deny any long-term differences in the economic, social, or political capacities of alI nationalities. However, the east/west dichotomy was nevertheless preserved as a cultural distinction (one that could at times contain much of the content of the old racial divide). This was not, in fact, surprising. Indeed, nothing better illustrates the way in which the Affirmative Action Empire preserved imperial categories, while reversing their policy implications, than the maintenance and systematization of colonialism's east/west dichotomy. Since this division did in fact influence policy implementation, my analysis of korenizatsiia has likewise preserved this old dichotomy. In Chapter 3, 1 undertook a case study of linguistic korenizatsiia in Ukraine, which was the most important policy in the Soviet "west." In this chapter, 1 analyze the most important policy in the Soviet "east": Affirmative Action, the practice of granting ·preferences to non-Russians in admissions, hiring, and promotion in education, industry, and government.1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4. 苏联东部的平权法案,1923-1932
今天,当爱德华·赛义德(Edward Said)把“东方主义”(orientalism)变成一个普遍认可的术语,并成为新兴学术产业的灵感来源时,在我们看来,没有什么比将人类划分为武断的、本质化的、等级森严的东方和西方更具有殖民主义特征的了。因此,其民族政策明确是作为一项非殖民化措施制定的苏联不拒绝这些类别,反而肯定人类的统一,这似乎是奇怪的。从某种意义上说,他们做到了。布尔什维克的马克思主义社会学使他们拒绝将东方和西方作为种族类别,并否认阿里民族在经济、社会或政治能力方面存在任何长期差异。然而,东西方的二分法作为一种文化差异被保留了下来(这种文化差异有时可能包含许多旧的种族差异的内容)。事实上,这并不令人惊讶。事实上,没有什么比殖民主义的东西方二分法的维持和系统化更能说明平权行动帝国保留了帝国的类别,同时扭转了它们的政策含义。由于这种划分实际上确实影响了政策的实施,我对korenizatsiia的分析同样保留了这种旧的二分法。在第三章中,我对乌克兰的语言korenizatsiia进行了个案研究,这是苏联“西方”最重要的政策。在本章中,我将分析苏联“东部”最重要的政策:平权行动,即在教育、工业和政府的录取、招聘和晋升方面给予非俄罗斯人优先权的做法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2. Borders and Ethnic Conflict Frontmatter 11. The Friendship of the Peoples Acknowledgments 3. Linguistic Ukrainization, 1923-1932
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1