Working Capital Management: A Comparative Study of Siemens AG and General Electric

Zayed Sultan Alqubaisi, Khalid Sead Alqubaisi, Syed Ashraf Pasha, Rami Afach, Bilal Daher, Abdulrhman Almarzooqi, Bashar Garba, Salah Rabee, Haitham Nobanee
{"title":"Working Capital Management: A Comparative Study of Siemens AG and General Electric","authors":"Zayed Sultan Alqubaisi, Khalid Sead Alqubaisi, Syed Ashraf Pasha, Rami Afach, Bilal Daher, Abdulrhman Almarzooqi, Bashar Garba, Salah Rabee, Haitham Nobanee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3765696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focal theme of the current research is to conduct comparative assessment of two firms in light of financial metrics will identify the strength and weaknesses of the respective firms. The comparative overview will allow one to understand the standards and practices that a firm can emulate to guarantee success. The firms under consideration are General Electrics and Siemens AG. <br><br>Extensive analysis found that the condition of General Electric is much better when it comes to liquidity and leverage. However, in terms of profitability and cash flow, the performance of SIE was found to be much better, which is consistent with the fact that firms with high WCM (GE) had low profitability.<br>","PeriodicalId":208149,"journal":{"name":"Finance Educator: Courses","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Educator: Courses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3765696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focal theme of the current research is to conduct comparative assessment of two firms in light of financial metrics will identify the strength and weaknesses of the respective firms. The comparative overview will allow one to understand the standards and practices that a firm can emulate to guarantee success. The firms under consideration are General Electrics and Siemens AG.

Extensive analysis found that the condition of General Electric is much better when it comes to liquidity and leverage. However, in terms of profitability and cash flow, the performance of SIE was found to be much better, which is consistent with the fact that firms with high WCM (GE) had low profitability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
营运资金管理:西门子公司与通用电气公司的比较研究
当前研究的焦点主题是根据财务指标对两家公司进行比较评估,从而确定各自公司的优势和劣势。比较概述将允许人们了解标准和做法,一个公司可以效仿,以确保成功。考虑中的公司包括通用电气和西门子。广泛的分析发现,通用电气在流动性和杠杆方面的状况要好得多。然而,在盈利能力和现金流方面,我们发现SIE的表现要好得多,这与WCM (GE)高的企业盈利能力低的事实是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Model for Small Basket Equities Financing Financial Performance Analysis of Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd (MOFSL) Cross-Border Valuation Using the International CAPM and the Constant Perpetual Growth Model Financial Analysis of Tesla Financial Analysis of Johnson & Johnson in Light of the COVID-19 Vaccination Research Developments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1