Patterns of use of chest physiotherapy in a teaching hospital.

Australian clinical review Pub Date : 1991-01-01
S Kinlay, L G Olson
{"title":"Patterns of use of chest physiotherapy in a teaching hospital.","authors":"S Kinlay,&nbsp;L G Olson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies of chest physiotherapy in medical patients have consistently shown benefit only in patients who produce large amounts of sputum. Among surgical patients systematically repeated maximal inspiration is the only procedure that clearly reduces the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications. Rationalization of the use of physiotherapy requires data on the pattern of its use. To obtain such data an audit was conducted on the use of physiotherapy in patients discharged from Royal Newcastle Hospital in October 1989. It was suspected that respiratory physicians would account for the bulk of chest physiotherapy. All patients admitted under respiratory physicians and random samples of patients admitted under other physicians and under surgical specialists were surveyed. Chest physiotherapy was ordered in 13/44 (30%) patients cared for by respiratory physicians, 5/45 (11%) other medical patients and 11/48 (23%) surgical patients (P = 0.049). Chest physiotherapy was ordered in 28 of 29 instances for conditions in which it is of no proven benefit. From the total numbers of medical and surgical patients it was estimated that 71% of chest physiotherapy referrals in October 1989 were for non-medical patients. About half of all referrals were initiated by junior medical staff. Much of the chest physiotherapy performed in the hospital was unlikely to have been of major clinical value and patients with respiratory illnesses were minor consumers of chest physiotherapy. Attempts to reduce wasteful overuse of chest physiotherapy may be most effective if directed at physiotherapists. If medical staff are targeted it would be essential to reach those attached to surgical units.</p>","PeriodicalId":77019,"journal":{"name":"Australian clinical review","volume":"11 4","pages":"154-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian clinical review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies of chest physiotherapy in medical patients have consistently shown benefit only in patients who produce large amounts of sputum. Among surgical patients systematically repeated maximal inspiration is the only procedure that clearly reduces the incidence of post-operative pulmonary complications. Rationalization of the use of physiotherapy requires data on the pattern of its use. To obtain such data an audit was conducted on the use of physiotherapy in patients discharged from Royal Newcastle Hospital in October 1989. It was suspected that respiratory physicians would account for the bulk of chest physiotherapy. All patients admitted under respiratory physicians and random samples of patients admitted under other physicians and under surgical specialists were surveyed. Chest physiotherapy was ordered in 13/44 (30%) patients cared for by respiratory physicians, 5/45 (11%) other medical patients and 11/48 (23%) surgical patients (P = 0.049). Chest physiotherapy was ordered in 28 of 29 instances for conditions in which it is of no proven benefit. From the total numbers of medical and surgical patients it was estimated that 71% of chest physiotherapy referrals in October 1989 were for non-medical patients. About half of all referrals were initiated by junior medical staff. Much of the chest physiotherapy performed in the hospital was unlikely to have been of major clinical value and patients with respiratory illnesses were minor consumers of chest physiotherapy. Attempts to reduce wasteful overuse of chest physiotherapy may be most effective if directed at physiotherapists. If medical staff are targeted it would be essential to reach those attached to surgical units.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某教学医院胸部物理治疗的应用模式
对内科患者进行胸部物理治疗的研究一致表明,只有对产生大量痰的患者有益。在手术患者中,系统地重复最大吸气是唯一能明显减少术后肺部并发症发生率的方法。物理治疗使用的合理化需要有关其使用模式的数据。为了获得这些数据,对1989年10月皇家纽卡斯尔医院出院的病人使用物理疗法的情况进行了审计。人们怀疑呼吸内科医生将占胸部物理治疗的大部分。所有接受呼吸内科医生治疗的患者以及随机抽样接受其他医生和外科专家治疗的患者接受了调查。由呼吸内科医生护理的患者中有13/44(30%),其他内科患者中有5/45(11%),外科患者中有11/48(23%)使用胸部物理治疗(P = 0.049)。胸部物理治疗在29例病例中有28例未被证实有益。从内科和外科病人的总数来看,估计1989年10月转介胸部物理治疗的人中有71%是非内科病人。大约一半的转诊是由初级医务人员提出的。在医院进行的大部分胸部物理治疗不太可能具有重大临床价值,呼吸系统疾病患者是胸部物理治疗的次要消费者。尝试减少浪费的过度使用胸部物理治疗可能是最有效的,如果直接针对物理治疗师。如果医务人员成为攻击目标,就必须接触到附属外科单位的医务人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
As it was in the beginning. Endoscopic photography: a valuable and cost-effective adjunct to patient care. The National Confidential Enquiry into Peri-operative Deaths (NCEPOD). Understanding variation: the key to cost reduction and quality improvement. A pressure care survey in the operating theatres.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1