Lidocaine prophylaxis in acute myocardial infarction.

Henry Ford Hospital medical journal Pub Date : 1991-01-01
J E Tisdale
{"title":"Lidocaine prophylaxis in acute myocardial infarction.","authors":"J E Tisdale","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prophylactic administration of lidocaine for the prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) following suspected acute myocardial infarction (MI) is controversial. The incidence of primary VF following acute MI ranges from 1.8% to 10.5%. \"Warning arrhythmias\" have not been shown to be reliable predictors of VF. In-hospital prophylactic administration of lidocaine has been shown to decrease the incidence of primary VF, whereas prehospital administration has not. However, prophylactic administration of lidocaine has not been shown to have a beneficial effect on mortality and may in fact increase mortality. The incidence of lidocaine-induced adverse effects during prophylaxis ranges from 4% to 85%, with an average of approximately 35%. In view of the low incidence of primary VF following acute MI, the high incidence of lidocaine-induced adverse effects, and the lack of evidence of beneficial effect on mortality, prophylactic lidocaine administration to all patients with suspected MI is not recommended. The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology recommend prophylactic lidocaine administration in patients with acute myocardial ischemia or MI who have ventricular premature beats that occur frequently (greater than 6 per minute), are closely coupled (R on T), multiform in configuration, or occur in short bursts of three or more in succession.</p>","PeriodicalId":12988,"journal":{"name":"Henry Ford Hospital medical journal","volume":"39 3-4","pages":"217-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Henry Ford Hospital medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prophylactic administration of lidocaine for the prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) following suspected acute myocardial infarction (MI) is controversial. The incidence of primary VF following acute MI ranges from 1.8% to 10.5%. "Warning arrhythmias" have not been shown to be reliable predictors of VF. In-hospital prophylactic administration of lidocaine has been shown to decrease the incidence of primary VF, whereas prehospital administration has not. However, prophylactic administration of lidocaine has not been shown to have a beneficial effect on mortality and may in fact increase mortality. The incidence of lidocaine-induced adverse effects during prophylaxis ranges from 4% to 85%, with an average of approximately 35%. In view of the low incidence of primary VF following acute MI, the high incidence of lidocaine-induced adverse effects, and the lack of evidence of beneficial effect on mortality, prophylactic lidocaine administration to all patients with suspected MI is not recommended. The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology recommend prophylactic lidocaine administration in patients with acute myocardial ischemia or MI who have ventricular premature beats that occur frequently (greater than 6 per minute), are closely coupled (R on T), multiform in configuration, or occur in short bursts of three or more in succession.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利多卡因预防急性心肌梗死。
预防利多卡因预防疑似急性心肌梗死(MI)后原发性心室颤动(VF)是有争议的。急性心肌梗死后原发室颤的发生率为1.8% ~ 10.5%。“警告性心律失常”尚未被证明是室性心动过速的可靠预测因素。在院内预防性给予利多卡因已被证明可以降低原发性室性房颤的发生率,而院前给予则没有。然而,预防性给予利多卡因并没有显示对死亡率有有益的影响,实际上可能会增加死亡率。预防期间利多卡因引起的不良反应发生率从4%到85%不等,平均约为35%。鉴于急性心肌梗死后原发VF发生率低,利多卡因引起的不良反应发生率高,且缺乏对死亡率有益作用的证据,不建议所有疑似心肌梗死患者预防性使用利多卡因。美国心脏协会和美国心脏病学会推荐急性心肌缺血或心肌梗死患者预防利多卡因,这些患者室性早搏频繁发生(大于每分钟6次),紧密耦合(R对T),构型多样,或连续发生三次或更多次的短脉冲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extracellular Ca2+ sensing in C-cells and parathyroid cells. Proceedings of the Urban Health Care Symposium II. June 2-4, 1991. Characterization of the clinical features of five families with hereditary primary cutaneous lichen amyloidosis and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Unusual features of multiple endocrine neoplasia. Long-term follow-up in four large MEN 2 families in The Netherlands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1