Imagining the P300 Speller: Good idea or nonsense?

A. Kübler, L. Botrel
{"title":"Imagining the P300 Speller: Good idea or nonsense?","authors":"A. Kübler, L. Botrel","doi":"10.1109/IWW-BCI.2019.8737338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The so-called P300-BCI provided high information transfer rates if stimuli are presented in the visual modality in healthy participants and those with severe neurological disease alike. Visual presentation of stimuli constitutes a severe obstacle to those with no control of eye movement. The following study investigated a potential alternative to using any sensory modality for stimulation. Instead healthy participants were instructed to imagine the traditional flashing matrix. To facilitate such imagery, stimuli were first presented sequentially in the visual and auditory domain. In Experiment 1 (N = 10) we found a decline in performance when stimuli were presented sequentially as compared to randomly, but still a P300 was identifiable albeit lower in amplitude. In Experiment 2 (N = 23) the matrix was still presented as a support, but no visual stimulation occurred. Instead the stimulation frequency was indicated by auditory clicks in condition 1 and removed altogether in condition 2. The P300 amplitude was significantly higher in target than non-target stimulations in both conditions, and higher in the no stimulation condition than in the auditory condition. Selection accuracy was above chance level for 8 participants in the auditory and for 10 in the no stimulation condition. Taken together results indicate that a P300 can be generated by imagined stimulation, but the paradigm requires further investigation and improvement.","PeriodicalId":345970,"journal":{"name":"2019 7th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 7th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWW-BCI.2019.8737338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The so-called P300-BCI provided high information transfer rates if stimuli are presented in the visual modality in healthy participants and those with severe neurological disease alike. Visual presentation of stimuli constitutes a severe obstacle to those with no control of eye movement. The following study investigated a potential alternative to using any sensory modality for stimulation. Instead healthy participants were instructed to imagine the traditional flashing matrix. To facilitate such imagery, stimuli were first presented sequentially in the visual and auditory domain. In Experiment 1 (N = 10) we found a decline in performance when stimuli were presented sequentially as compared to randomly, but still a P300 was identifiable albeit lower in amplitude. In Experiment 2 (N = 23) the matrix was still presented as a support, but no visual stimulation occurred. Instead the stimulation frequency was indicated by auditory clicks in condition 1 and removed altogether in condition 2. The P300 amplitude was significantly higher in target than non-target stimulations in both conditions, and higher in the no stimulation condition than in the auditory condition. Selection accuracy was above chance level for 8 participants in the auditory and for 10 in the no stimulation condition. Taken together results indicate that a P300 can be generated by imagined stimulation, but the paradigm requires further investigation and improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
想象P300拼写器:好主意还是废话?
如果刺激以视觉方式呈现在健康参与者和患有严重神经系统疾病的参与者身上,所谓的P300-BCI提供了高的信息传递率。视觉上的刺激对那些无法控制眼球运动的人来说是一个严重的障碍。下面的研究调查了使用任何感官刺激方式的潜在替代方案。相反,健康的参与者被要求想象传统的闪烁矩阵。为了促进这种意象,刺激首先在视觉和听觉领域依次呈现。在实验1 (N = 10)中,我们发现,与随机呈现刺激相比,顺序呈现刺激会导致表现下降,但仍然可以识别P300,尽管振幅较低。在实验2 (N = 23)中,基质仍作为支撑呈现,但不产生视觉刺激。相反,在条件1中,刺激频率由听觉滴答声表示,在条件2中完全去除。在两种情况下,目标刺激的P300波幅均显著高于非目标刺激,无刺激的P300波幅均显著高于听觉刺激。有8人在听觉条件下选择正确率高于随机水平,10人在无刺激条件下选择正确率高于随机水平。综上所述,P300可以通过想象刺激产生,但这种模式还需要进一步的研究和完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biometrics Based on Single-Trial EEG The Effect of a Binaural Beat Combined with Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response Triggers on Brainwave Entrainment Estimation of speed and direction of arm movements from M1 activity using a nonlinear neural decoder A Hybrid MI-SSVEP based Brain Computer Interface for Potential Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation: A Pilot Study Recurrent convolutional neural network model based on temporal and spatial feature for motor imagery classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1