Learning Styles and Learning Abilities of Grade 6 Pupils in Dealing with Modular Learning

Angel Lhi Dela Cruz, Irish C. Camat, Angel Grace G. Caro, Mary Grace C. Catahum, Hanna Raquel C. Jabido, Kris D. Reyes, Angelo P. Florague, Ma. Yzelle M. Bayog, Ivy N. Macagba
{"title":"Learning Styles and Learning Abilities of Grade 6 Pupils in Dealing with Modular Learning","authors":"Angel Lhi Dela Cruz, Irish C. Camat, Angel Grace G. Caro, Mary Grace C. Catahum, Hanna Raquel C. Jabido, Kris D. Reyes, Angelo P. Florague, Ma. Yzelle M. Bayog, Ivy N. Macagba","doi":"10.54536/ajet.v1i2.483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to determine the learning styles and learning abilities of grade 6 pupils in dealing with modular learning. A descriptive design was used in this study. The survey was conducted in Lt. Andres Calungsud Elementary School to 30 elementary pupils who are enrolled in modular learning for School Year 2021-2022 and the majority of them were male pupils. A Researcher-made survey questionnaire was used in data gathering. Frequency and percentage distribution, mean and standard deviation, megastat were used in treating the data. The study revealed that the pupils have difficulty dealing with terms in their modules. Data show that the respondents got the highest mean in visual learning style interpreted as Often (M=2.60) and the lowest mean in auditory learning style. The respondent’s learning style in reading/writing got the lowest overall mean Sometimes (OM=1.94). The study found out that the highest problem encountered by the students in dealing with modular learning is confused by words. Data show that the respondent’s Digital - age Literacy type Learning Abilities got the highest mean of Sometimes (M=2.17) in the item “I feel comfortable using digital devices”. The respondent’s learning ability in problem-based thinking and problem-solving got the lowest mean of Sometimes. The Elementary pupils are highly satisfied with how teachers showed interest in helping students to develop personal skills and qualities. Moreover, the respondents are least satisfied with how they received sufficient advice and guidance in relation to the module. Finally, there is a significant difference in the learning styles and learning abilities of respondents.","PeriodicalId":204039,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Education and Technology","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Education and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i2.483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the learning styles and learning abilities of grade 6 pupils in dealing with modular learning. A descriptive design was used in this study. The survey was conducted in Lt. Andres Calungsud Elementary School to 30 elementary pupils who are enrolled in modular learning for School Year 2021-2022 and the majority of them were male pupils. A Researcher-made survey questionnaire was used in data gathering. Frequency and percentage distribution, mean and standard deviation, megastat were used in treating the data. The study revealed that the pupils have difficulty dealing with terms in their modules. Data show that the respondents got the highest mean in visual learning style interpreted as Often (M=2.60) and the lowest mean in auditory learning style. The respondent’s learning style in reading/writing got the lowest overall mean Sometimes (OM=1.94). The study found out that the highest problem encountered by the students in dealing with modular learning is confused by words. Data show that the respondent’s Digital - age Literacy type Learning Abilities got the highest mean of Sometimes (M=2.17) in the item “I feel comfortable using digital devices”. The respondent’s learning ability in problem-based thinking and problem-solving got the lowest mean of Sometimes. The Elementary pupils are highly satisfied with how teachers showed interest in helping students to develop personal skills and qualities. Moreover, the respondents are least satisfied with how they received sufficient advice and guidance in relation to the module. Finally, there is a significant difference in the learning styles and learning abilities of respondents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
六年级小学生处理模块化学习的学习风格和学习能力
本研究旨在探讨六年级小学生处理模块化学习的学习风格和学习能力。本研究采用描述性设计。这项调查是在安德烈斯·卡隆苏德中尉小学对30名参加2021-2022学年模块化学习的小学生进行的,其中大多数是男生。数据收集采用研究者自行制作的调查问卷。数据处理采用频率和百分比分布、均值和标准差、巨态分布。研究显示,学生们在处理模块中的术语方面存在困难。数据显示,被调查者在视觉学习风格上的均值最高(M=2.60),在听觉学习风格上的均值最低。被调查者在阅读/写作方面的学习风格得分最低(OM=1.94)。研究发现,学生在模块化学习中遇到的最高问题是单词混淆。数据显示,被调查者的数字时代识字型学习能力在“我觉得使用数字设备很舒服”这一项中有时的平均值最高(M=2.17)。被调查者在问题型思维和解决问题方面的学习能力在“有时”中得分最低。小学生对老师在帮助学生发展个人技能和素质方面表现出的兴趣非常满意。此外,受访者对如何获得与该模块相关的足够建议和指导最不满意。最后,被调查者的学习风格和学习能力存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Resource Management: Examining MOOE Allocation Utilization for Annual Improvement Plan (AIP) Understanding Teacher Experiences Amidst Principal Reshuffling: A Phenomenological Inquiry Investigating the Impact of Information Communication Technology (ICT) Illiteracy Levels on the Academic Performance of First-Year Students: A Case of Emmanuel University Level of Collaboration among Stakeholders to Promote Inclusive Education in Schools: The Case of Lilongwe Rural East and Mthandiza Zone in Dedza Designing and Evaluating an Outcome-Based Education Model: A Case Study at Angeli Gilbert Christian Academy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1