Juridical Analysis Of The Application Of The Guarantee Article Does Not Cross Disputes In The Deed Of Waiver With Compensation (Study Decision No. 1016 K / PDT / 2015)

Duma Sari Lubis, H. Purba, Keizerina Devi Azwar, Suprayetno Suprayetno
{"title":"Juridical Analysis Of The Application Of The Guarantee Article Does Not Cross Disputes In The Deed Of Waiver With Compensation (Study Decision No. 1016 K / PDT / 2015)","authors":"Duma Sari Lubis, H. Purba, Keizerina Devi Azwar, Suprayetno Suprayetno","doi":"10.24815/sklj.v6i2.28401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the juridical application of the guarantee article not cross-disputed in the deed of waiver with compensation (Study Decision Number 1016 K / Pdt / 2015).  The transfer of land rights is the activity of releasing the legal relationship between the holder of land rights and the land he controls by providing compensation on the basis of deliberation. The method used in this study is the legal research method.  The results showed that the analysis of the Supreme Court decision number 1016K / Pdt / 2015 relating to the application of the non-cross-dispute guarantee article in the deed of waiver of rights with compensation is correct.  Inhis judgment, the judge stated legally that the Deed of Waiver with Compensation Number 22 to 30 each dated November 2004 was made before Notary H. Achmad, S.H., (Notary in Medan). And the factthat each dated November 9, 2004 which has been legalized by H. Achmad, S.H., (Notary in Medan) is valid and has binding legal force, while the Letter of Disclosure of Land Rights with Compensation dated July 14, 2005 is legally defective and has no legal force.","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i2.28401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the juridical application of the guarantee article not cross-disputed in the deed of waiver with compensation (Study Decision Number 1016 K / Pdt / 2015).  The transfer of land rights is the activity of releasing the legal relationship between the holder of land rights and the land he controls by providing compensation on the basis of deliberation. The method used in this study is the legal research method.  The results showed that the analysis of the Supreme Court decision number 1016K / Pdt / 2015 relating to the application of the non-cross-dispute guarantee article in the deed of waiver of rights with compensation is correct.  Inhis judgment, the judge stated legally that the Deed of Waiver with Compensation Number 22 to 30 each dated November 2004 was made before Notary H. Achmad, S.H., (Notary in Medan). And the factthat each dated November 9, 2004 which has been legalized by H. Achmad, S.H., (Notary in Medan) is valid and has binding legal force, while the Letter of Disclosure of Land Rights with Compensation dated July 14, 2005 is legally defective and has no legal force.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于担保条款在弃权赔偿契据中不跨越争议适用的法律分析(研究决定第1016 K / PDT / 2015号)
本研究旨在分析赔偿放弃契据(研究决定号1016 K / Pdt / 2015)中无交叉争议担保条款的司法适用。土地权利流转是土地权利人在协商的基础上给予补偿,解除其与其所控制的土地之间法律关系的活动。本研究使用的方法是法律研究方法。结果表明,最高院第1016K / Pdt / 2015号判决关于赔偿放弃权利契据中适用无交叉争议担保条款的分析是正确的。在他的判决中,法官在法律上表示,2004年11月的弃权契据编号为22至30,是在公证人H. Achmad, s.h.(棉兰公证人)面前作出的。事实上,2004年11月9日由H. ahmad, s.h.(棉兰公证人)合法化的每一份都是有效的,具有约束力的法律效力,而2005年7月14日的土地权利补偿披露书在法律上是有缺陷的,没有法律效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Integration of Judicial Review in Indonesia Aceh’s Government Role Implementation in Overcoming Emergency of Natural Disaster and Outbreak of Diseases LEGAL STUDY ON THE ACTION OF PKPU ADMINISTRATORS THAT CONDUCTED ILLEGAL INCREASE OF CREDITORS’ RECEIVABLES The Perspectives of Legal Progressivism Concerning Song Royalty Payments Actions By KPI As A Supervisory Institution Against Advertisements That Violate Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1