Liquidity of Government of India Bonds: Trading Volume Based Analysis

K. Rathi, H. Pradhan
{"title":"Liquidity of Government of India Bonds: Trading Volume Based Analysis","authors":"K. Rathi, H. Pradhan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3085134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Bonds experience high trading volume right after their issuance. Outstanding amount of a bond is built by multiple follow on reissuances. Trading volume also picks up when bond is reissued. This paper investigates impact of bond’s age since issuance on its weekly trading volume. In addition it also investigates impact of trade size, outstanding amount, Foreign Institutional Investor (FII) trading, Repo rate volatility, Yield to Maturity volatility and Mumbai Interbank Offer Rate (MIBOR) volatility in the Indian context. Design, Methodology & Approach: This paper builds on Hong and Warga (2000), Kalimipalli and Warga (2002), and Diaz et. al. (2006). Non-linear regression is used to investigate exponential decay of weekly trading market share of 5, 10 and 30 Year bonds with respect to age. The model also explores linear relationship of other factors on the weekly trading volume. Findings: (This) Our research finds evidence of decay in trading with respect to bond age, reissuance and trade size. The model suggests two issuances of 5 year, three issuances of 10 Year and one issuance of 30 year bond per year for optimum trading volume in the Government of India (GoI) bond market. Implications: GoI publishes a tentative schedule with no indication of which tenure will be auctioned. This uncertainty impacts the trading as market lacks anticipation of maturity segments in the yield curve. A regular schedule of 5, 10 and 30 year bonds provides for better public debt management with enhanced trading liquidity and lower cost of public debt. Originality & Value: Literature review provides no evidence of similar study in Indian context. Hence it is the first study of this kind. This study provides a bond issuance approach for enhanced public debt management, market trading and lower cost of public debt. Research Limitations: Due to lack of data, over the counter (OTC) trades are not incorporated in the analysis. Inclusion of treasury bills trades in the model may provide better understanding of trading risk.","PeriodicalId":127865,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: Budget","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: Budget","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3085134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Bonds experience high trading volume right after their issuance. Outstanding amount of a bond is built by multiple follow on reissuances. Trading volume also picks up when bond is reissued. This paper investigates impact of bond’s age since issuance on its weekly trading volume. In addition it also investigates impact of trade size, outstanding amount, Foreign Institutional Investor (FII) trading, Repo rate volatility, Yield to Maturity volatility and Mumbai Interbank Offer Rate (MIBOR) volatility in the Indian context. Design, Methodology & Approach: This paper builds on Hong and Warga (2000), Kalimipalli and Warga (2002), and Diaz et. al. (2006). Non-linear regression is used to investigate exponential decay of weekly trading market share of 5, 10 and 30 Year bonds with respect to age. The model also explores linear relationship of other factors on the weekly trading volume. Findings: (This) Our research finds evidence of decay in trading with respect to bond age, reissuance and trade size. The model suggests two issuances of 5 year, three issuances of 10 Year and one issuance of 30 year bond per year for optimum trading volume in the Government of India (GoI) bond market. Implications: GoI publishes a tentative schedule with no indication of which tenure will be auctioned. This uncertainty impacts the trading as market lacks anticipation of maturity segments in the yield curve. A regular schedule of 5, 10 and 30 year bonds provides for better public debt management with enhanced trading liquidity and lower cost of public debt. Originality & Value: Literature review provides no evidence of similar study in Indian context. Hence it is the first study of this kind. This study provides a bond issuance approach for enhanced public debt management, market trading and lower cost of public debt. Research Limitations: Due to lack of data, over the counter (OTC) trades are not incorporated in the analysis. Inclusion of treasury bills trades in the model may provide better understanding of trading risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度政府债券的流动性:基于交易量的分析
目的:债券发行后交易量大。债券的未偿金额是通过多次后续再发行来建立的。当债券重新发行时,交易量也会增加。本文研究了债券发行年限对周交易量的影响。此外,它还调查了交易规模、未偿金额、外国机构投资者(FII)交易、回购利率波动、到期收益率波动和孟买银行间同业拆借利率(MIBOR)波动在印度背景下的影响。设计、方法论和方法:本文以Hong and Warga(2000)、Kalimipalli and Warga(2002)以及Diaz et al.(2006)为基础。采用非线性回归研究了5年期、10年期和30年期债券周交易市场份额随年龄的指数衰减。该模型还探讨了其他因素对周交易量的线性关系。研究发现:(1)我们的研究发现了债券年龄、再发行和交易规模相关的交易衰减的证据。该模型建议印度政府债券市场每年发行两次5年期债券,发行三次10年期债券和发行一次30年期债券,以达到最佳交易量。含义:印度政府公布了一份暂定时间表,没有表明将拍卖哪些土地使用权。由于市场缺乏对收益率曲线上到期部分的预期,这种不确定性影响了交易。定期发行5年期、10年期和30年期债券有助于改善公共债务管理,提高交易流动性,降低公共债务成本。原创性和价值:文献综述没有提供印度背景下类似研究的证据。因此,这是第一次这样的研究。本研究为加强公共债务管理、市场交易和降低公共债务成本提供了一种债券发行途径。研究局限:由于缺乏数据,场外交易没有纳入分析。在模型中纳入国库券交易可以更好地理解交易风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Presidents in Deficit: Are there Historical Rewards to Deficits? A Comparative Assessment for 2022 State Budget in Azerbaijan Selective Default Expectations Is Metallica Fractal? A Case Study European Safe Assets: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1