An Analysis of Frameworks for Microservices

R. Meloca, R. Ré, André Luis Schwerz
{"title":"An Analysis of Frameworks for Microservices","authors":"R. Meloca, R. Ré, André Luis Schwerz","doi":"10.1109/CLEI.2018.00071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microservices is a modern architectural style in which developers decomposes a software system into many services loose coupled with small responsibilities. Given its inherent complexity, many frameworks have been proposed in order to support developers in microservices. However, due to its particularities, the whole process of choosing the most appropriate framework for developers' needs is a time-consuming and challenging task. In this paper, we present a qualitative study that compares both KumuluzEE and Spring Cloud & NetFlix OSS frameworks through functional and non-functional requirements. We tested each framework by developing a hypothetical scenario with each of them. Our results show that although the KumuluzEE supports few characteristics of the microservices architecture, it is easier to use, especially, for newcomers. Instead, the Spring Cloud & NetFlix OSS is suitable for large-scale systems and experienced development teams, and it holds a higher number of the architecture characteristics. However, learnability for newcomers is low even though the framework provides a substantial documentation.","PeriodicalId":379986,"journal":{"name":"2018 XLIV Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 XLIV Latin American Computer Conference (CLEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI.2018.00071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Microservices is a modern architectural style in which developers decomposes a software system into many services loose coupled with small responsibilities. Given its inherent complexity, many frameworks have been proposed in order to support developers in microservices. However, due to its particularities, the whole process of choosing the most appropriate framework for developers' needs is a time-consuming and challenging task. In this paper, we present a qualitative study that compares both KumuluzEE and Spring Cloud & NetFlix OSS frameworks through functional and non-functional requirements. We tested each framework by developing a hypothetical scenario with each of them. Our results show that although the KumuluzEE supports few characteristics of the microservices architecture, it is easier to use, especially, for newcomers. Instead, the Spring Cloud & NetFlix OSS is suitable for large-scale systems and experienced development teams, and it holds a higher number of the architecture characteristics. However, learnability for newcomers is low even though the framework provides a substantial documentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微服务框架分析
微服务是一种现代架构风格,在这种风格中,开发人员将软件系统分解为许多松散耦合的小职责服务。考虑到其固有的复杂性,为了支持微服务中的开发人员,已经提出了许多框架。然而,由于其特殊性,为开发人员的需求选择最合适的框架的整个过程是一项耗时且具有挑战性的任务。在本文中,我们提出了一项定性研究,通过功能和非功能需求比较KumuluzEE和Spring Cloud & NetFlix OSS框架。我们通过开发每个框架的假设场景来测试每个框架。我们的结果表明,尽管KumuluzEE支持微服务架构的一些特征,但它更容易使用,尤其是对新手来说。相反,Spring Cloud & NetFlix OSS适合大型系统和经验丰富的开发团队,并且它拥有更多的体系结构特征。然而,尽管框架提供了大量的文档,但新手的易学性很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Data Quality Measurement Framework A Chatterbot Sensitive to Student's Context to Help on Software Engineering Education Quality Assessment of Awareness Support in Agile Collaborative Tools Digital Recording of Temporal Sequences of Images Applied to the Analysis of the Phenological Evolution of Maize Crops Ludic Practices to Support the Development of Software Engineering Educational Games: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1