Challenging the Rhetorical Conception of Health Literacy: Aging, Interdependence, and Networked Caregiving

Dawn S. Opel
{"title":"Challenging the Rhetorical Conception of Health Literacy: Aging, Interdependence, and Networked Caregiving","authors":"Dawn S. Opel","doi":"10.21623/1.6.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Caregiving is a critical and yet understudied area related to aging, health, and wellness. Despite the importance of caregiving in the lives of older adults, assumptions about aging “actively” or “successfully” suggest that aging is independent, not interdependent. The healthcare industry reiterates these gerontological assumptions about aging when invoking notions of skills-based health literacy. This essay is an analysis of and response to the rhetorics of literacy as used in health care. Using John Duffy’s theoretical framework for literacy development as well as scholarship in age studies and community-literacy studies, I argue that literacy has become a rhetorical construct that promotes a view of older adults as particularly draining on the healthcare system. A more productive approach would be to frame the collaborative, distributed, and mediated work of giving and receiving care in the context of Paul Prior’s concept of literate activity. Finally, with a community-literacy approach that incorporates engagement and dialogue rather than individualistic skill development, I respond to this rhetorical construct of health literacy by considering how aging, interdependence, and networked caregiving expand the notion of what contributes to healthy living and well-being as we age. Using examples from a community care coordination project, this essay shows how compositionists might work together with patients, caregivers, and professionals to reframe health literacy rhetorics and act for change.","PeriodicalId":443350,"journal":{"name":"Literacy in Composition Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy in Composition Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21623/1.6.2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract: Caregiving is a critical and yet understudied area related to aging, health, and wellness. Despite the importance of caregiving in the lives of older adults, assumptions about aging “actively” or “successfully” suggest that aging is independent, not interdependent. The healthcare industry reiterates these gerontological assumptions about aging when invoking notions of skills-based health literacy. This essay is an analysis of and response to the rhetorics of literacy as used in health care. Using John Duffy’s theoretical framework for literacy development as well as scholarship in age studies and community-literacy studies, I argue that literacy has become a rhetorical construct that promotes a view of older adults as particularly draining on the healthcare system. A more productive approach would be to frame the collaborative, distributed, and mediated work of giving and receiving care in the context of Paul Prior’s concept of literate activity. Finally, with a community-literacy approach that incorporates engagement and dialogue rather than individualistic skill development, I respond to this rhetorical construct of health literacy by considering how aging, interdependence, and networked caregiving expand the notion of what contributes to healthy living and well-being as we age. Using examples from a community care coordination project, this essay shows how compositionists might work together with patients, caregivers, and professionals to reframe health literacy rhetorics and act for change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战健康素养的修辞概念:老龄化、相互依存和网络化护理
摘要:护理是一个与老龄化、健康和健康相关的关键但研究不足的领域。尽管照顾在老年人的生活中很重要,但关于“积极地”或“成功地”衰老的假设表明,衰老是独立的,而不是相互依赖的。医疗保健行业在援引基于技能的健康素养概念时,重申了这些关于衰老的老年学假设。这篇文章是对卫生保健中使用的扫盲修辞的分析和回应。我利用约翰·达菲关于读写能力发展的理论框架,以及年龄研究和社区读写能力研究方面的学术研究,认为读写能力已经成为一种修辞结构,它促进了一种观点,即老年人特别消耗医疗系统。一个更有成效的方法是在Paul Prior的识字活动概念的背景下,将给予和接受护理的协作、分布式和中介工作框架化。最后,通过一种包含参与和对话而不是个人技能发展的社区扫盲方法,我通过考虑老龄化、相互依存和网络化护理如何扩展我们年龄增长时健康生活和幸福的概念,来回应这种健康扫盲的修辞结构。本文以社区护理协调项目为例,展示了作曲者如何与患者、护理人员和专业人员一起工作,重新构建健康素养修辞并采取行动进行变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editors' Introduction to Issue 11.1 Theorycrafting Algorithms: Teaching Algorithmic Literacy Book Review Undoing the Grade: Why We Grade, and How to Stop by Jesse Stommel Book Review Looking Like a Language, Sounding Like a Race: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and the Learning of Latinidad by Jonathan Rosa DIY Delivery Systems: Rethinking Self-Sponsorship through Extracurricular Literacy Narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1