Is Democracy Good for Corporate Investment?

Yan Li, Youan Wang, Zigan Wang, Q. Yin
{"title":"Is Democracy Good for Corporate Investment?","authors":"Yan Li, Youan Wang, Zigan Wang, Q. Yin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3818257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using corporate data in 19 countries that experienced democracy status transitions between 1983 and 2017, we find that firm investment decreases by over 30% following democratization. This negative democracy-investment relationship is driven by higher employee welfare and regulatory costs and is stronger for politically connected firms, financially unconstrained firms and in less corrupted countries. The firm investment drop is also due primarily to the reduced investment inefficiency that accompanies higher post-democratization firm profitability, valuation, and stock return. The initial drop has a duration of only two years, and firm investment eventually increases in the fifth year after democratization. Several robustness tests and IV regressions further confirm our main results.","PeriodicalId":284021,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Investment & Finance eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Investment & Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3818257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using corporate data in 19 countries that experienced democracy status transitions between 1983 and 2017, we find that firm investment decreases by over 30% following democratization. This negative democracy-investment relationship is driven by higher employee welfare and regulatory costs and is stronger for politically connected firms, financially unconstrained firms and in less corrupted countries. The firm investment drop is also due primarily to the reduced investment inefficiency that accompanies higher post-democratization firm profitability, valuation, and stock return. The initial drop has a duration of only two years, and firm investment eventually increases in the fifth year after democratization. Several robustness tests and IV regressions further confirm our main results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民主有利于企业投资吗?
利用1983年至2017年间经历民主转型的19个国家的企业数据,我们发现企业投资在民主化后减少了30%以上。这种消极的民主-投资关系是由更高的员工福利和监管成本驱动的,对于有政治关系的公司、财务不受约束的公司和腐败程度较低的国家来说,这种关系更为强烈。企业投资下降的主要原因还在于,随着民主化后企业盈利能力、估值和股票回报的提高,投资效率降低了。最初的下降只持续两年,而企业投资最终会在民主化后的第5年增加。几个稳健性检验和IV回归进一步证实了我们的主要结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Socioemotional Wealth on Corporate Reporting Readability in a Multinational Family-Controlled Firm Stock Ownership of Federal Judges and its Impact on Corporations Place-Based Policies and the Geography of Corporate Investment Foreign bias in equity portfolios: Informational advantage or familiarity bias? Quantifying the Impact of Impact Investing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1