Functional Locking through Omission: From HLS to Obfuscated Design

Z. Wang, S. Mohammed, Y. Makris, Benjamin Carrión Schäfer
{"title":"Functional Locking through Omission: From HLS to Obfuscated Design","authors":"Z. Wang, S. Mohammed, Y. Makris, Benjamin Carrión Schäfer","doi":"10.1109/ICCD53106.2021.00095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"VLSI design companies are now mainly fabless and spend large amount of resources to develop their Intellectual Property (IP). It is therefore paramount to protect their IPs from being stolen and illegally reversed engineered. The main approach so far to protect the IP has been to add additional locking logic such that the circuit does not meet the given specifications if the user does not apply the correct key. The main problem with this approach is that the fabless company has to submit the entire design, including the locking circuitry, to the fab. Moreover, these companies often subcontract the VLSI design back-end to a third-party. This implies that the third-party company or fab could potentially tamper with the locking mechanism. One alternative approach is to lock through omission. The main idea is to judiciously select a portion of the design and map it onto an embedded FPGA (eFPGA). In this case, the bitstream acts as the logic key. Third party company nor the fab will, in this case, have access to the locking mechanism as the eFPGA is left un-programmed. This is obviously a more secure way to lock the circuit. The main problem with this approach is the area, power, and delay overhead associated with it. To address this, in this work, we present a framework that takes as input an untimed behavioral description for High-Level Synthesis (HLS) and automatically extracts a portion of the circuit to the eFPGA such that the area overhead is minimized while the original timing constraint is not violated. The main advantage of starting at the behavioral level is that partitioning the design at this stage allows the HLS process to fully re-optimize the circuit, thus, reducing the overhead introduced by this obfuscation mechanism. We also developed a framework to test our proposed approach and plan to release it to the community to encourage the community to find new techniques to break the proposed obfuscation method.","PeriodicalId":154014,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 39th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 39th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD53106.2021.00095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

VLSI design companies are now mainly fabless and spend large amount of resources to develop their Intellectual Property (IP). It is therefore paramount to protect their IPs from being stolen and illegally reversed engineered. The main approach so far to protect the IP has been to add additional locking logic such that the circuit does not meet the given specifications if the user does not apply the correct key. The main problem with this approach is that the fabless company has to submit the entire design, including the locking circuitry, to the fab. Moreover, these companies often subcontract the VLSI design back-end to a third-party. This implies that the third-party company or fab could potentially tamper with the locking mechanism. One alternative approach is to lock through omission. The main idea is to judiciously select a portion of the design and map it onto an embedded FPGA (eFPGA). In this case, the bitstream acts as the logic key. Third party company nor the fab will, in this case, have access to the locking mechanism as the eFPGA is left un-programmed. This is obviously a more secure way to lock the circuit. The main problem with this approach is the area, power, and delay overhead associated with it. To address this, in this work, we present a framework that takes as input an untimed behavioral description for High-Level Synthesis (HLS) and automatically extracts a portion of the circuit to the eFPGA such that the area overhead is minimized while the original timing constraint is not violated. The main advantage of starting at the behavioral level is that partitioning the design at this stage allows the HLS process to fully re-optimize the circuit, thus, reducing the overhead introduced by this obfuscation mechanism. We also developed a framework to test our proposed approach and plan to release it to the community to encourage the community to find new techniques to break the proposed obfuscation method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过省略实现功能锁定:从HLS到模糊设计
VLSI设计公司现在主要是无晶圆厂,并花费大量资源来开发他们的知识产权(IP)。因此,保护他们的ip不被窃取和非法逆向工程是至关重要的。到目前为止,保护IP的主要方法是增加额外的锁定逻辑,这样如果用户没有应用正确的密钥,电路就不符合给定的规格。这种方法的主要问题是,无晶圆厂公司必须将整个设计提交给晶圆厂,包括锁定电路。此外,这些公司经常将VLSI设计后端分包给第三方。这意味着第三方公司或工厂可能会篡改锁定机制。另一种方法是通过省略进行锁定。主要思想是明智地选择设计的一部分并将其映射到嵌入式FPGA (eFPGA)上。在这种情况下,比特流充当逻辑密钥。在这种情况下,由于eFPGA未编程,第三方公司或晶圆厂都无法访问锁定机制。这显然是一种更安全的锁定电路的方法。这种方法的主要问题是与之相关的面积、功率和延迟开销。为了解决这个问题,在这项工作中,我们提出了一个框架,该框架将高级合成(HLS)的非定时行为描述作为输入,并自动提取电路的一部分到eFPGA,以便在不违反原始时序约束的情况下将面积开销最小化。从行为级别开始的主要优点是,在此阶段划分设计允许HLS过程完全重新优化电路,从而减少这种混淆机制引入的开销。我们还开发了一个框架来测试我们提出的方法,并计划将其发布给社区,以鼓励社区找到新的技术来打破提出的混淆方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart-DNN: Efficiently Reducing the Memory Requirements of Running Deep Neural Networks on Resource-constrained Platforms CoRe-ECO: Concurrent Refinement of Detailed Place-and-Route for an Efficient ECO Automation Accurate and Fast Performance Modeling of Processors with Decoupled Front-end Block-LSM: An Ether-aware Block-ordered LSM-tree based Key-Value Storage Engine Dynamic File Cache Optimization for Hybrid SSDs with High-Density and Low-Cost Flash Memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1