[Prednisolone-dependent asthma patients--often under-treated in ambulatory care? Results of a retrospective study].

R Förster
{"title":"[Prednisolone-dependent asthma patients--often under-treated in ambulatory care? Results of a retrospective study].","authors":"R Förster","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A retrospective descriptive analysis of 140 asthmatic patients, classified in our hospital as corticosteroid dependent and treated in outpatients departments showed, that 63% received slow release theophylline (SRT). 33% of them were within the therapeutic dose range, 44% did tolerate a further dose increase of SRT and 23% showed signs of intoxication which could be reduced by decreasing the dose. 12% of all patients were not on oral or inhaled corticosteroids at all. Only 52% received a combined antiasthmatic treatment including corticosteroids and both slow release theophylline and beta-agonists. This percentage was reduced to 18% if secretolytics are counted as a part of combination therapy. During hospital treatment it became evident that actually only 3% of all patients did not tolerate Theophylline retard due to side effects. In hospital 94% of all 140 patients received combined treatment (SRT, beta-agonists and corticosteroids). All of them showed a clear-cut improvement of major asthma symptoms (PEF monitoring, symptom scores, consumption of additional bronchodilators). It is concluded, that steroid dependent asthmatic out-patients are often undertreated: a minor part does not receive steroids at all; about one half does not receive drug therapy combined with bronchodilators; 67 per cent of the patients, who receive SRT (about 2/3 of the total number) is not under optimal theophylline dose regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":76840,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Erkrankungen der Atmungsorgane","volume":"177 1-2","pages":"96-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Erkrankungen der Atmungsorgane","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A retrospective descriptive analysis of 140 asthmatic patients, classified in our hospital as corticosteroid dependent and treated in outpatients departments showed, that 63% received slow release theophylline (SRT). 33% of them were within the therapeutic dose range, 44% did tolerate a further dose increase of SRT and 23% showed signs of intoxication which could be reduced by decreasing the dose. 12% of all patients were not on oral or inhaled corticosteroids at all. Only 52% received a combined antiasthmatic treatment including corticosteroids and both slow release theophylline and beta-agonists. This percentage was reduced to 18% if secretolytics are counted as a part of combination therapy. During hospital treatment it became evident that actually only 3% of all patients did not tolerate Theophylline retard due to side effects. In hospital 94% of all 140 patients received combined treatment (SRT, beta-agonists and corticosteroids). All of them showed a clear-cut improvement of major asthma symptoms (PEF monitoring, symptom scores, consumption of additional bronchodilators). It is concluded, that steroid dependent asthmatic out-patients are often undertreated: a minor part does not receive steroids at all; about one half does not receive drug therapy combined with bronchodilators; 67 per cent of the patients, who receive SRT (about 2/3 of the total number) is not under optimal theophylline dose regimen.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[强的松龙依赖哮喘患者-经常在门诊治疗不足?]回顾性研究的结果]。
回顾性分析我院门诊收治的140例皮质类固醇依赖哮喘患者,63%接受缓释茶碱(SRT)治疗。其中33%在治疗剂量范围内,44%耐受SRT进一步增加剂量,23%出现中毒症状,可以通过减少剂量来减轻中毒症状。12%的患者完全不使用口服或吸入皮质类固醇。只有52%的患者接受了包括皮质类固醇、缓释茶碱和β激动剂在内的联合平喘治疗。如果将促分泌剂算作联合治疗的一部分,这一比例将降至18%。在医院治疗期间,很明显,实际上只有3%的患者由于副作用而不能耐受茶碱缓释剂。在医院,140名患者中有94%接受了联合治疗(SRT、β激动剂和皮质类固醇)。所有患者的主要哮喘症状(PEF监测、症状评分、额外使用支气管扩张剂)均明显改善。结论是,类固醇依赖哮喘门诊患者往往治疗不足:一小部分根本不接受类固醇治疗;大约一半的患者没有接受药物治疗和支气管扩张剂联合治疗;67%接受SRT的患者(约占总人数的2/3)不在最佳茶碱剂量方案下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Immunohistochemically detected activity of lysozyme in sarcoidosis granulomas--a parameter for the activity of the illness process?]. Applied immunology, histochemistry and microbiology in lung diseases. Report of a symposium. International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (European Region) and the Society of Pulmonology and Tuberculosis, 1989. Double immunoenzyme staining. Induction of a mucosal immune response by oral immunization. An overview. [Dyspnea--disproportion between expense and success].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1