Learning Effect Axioms via Probabilistic Logic Programming

Rolf Schwitter
{"title":"Learning Effect Axioms via Probabilistic Logic Programming","authors":"Rolf Schwitter","doi":"10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2017.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we showed how we can automatically learn the structure and parameters of probabilistic effect axioms for the Simple Event Calculus (SEC) from positive and negative example interpretations stated as short dialogue sequences in natural language. We used the cplint framework for this task that provides \nlibraries for structure and parameter learning and for answering queries with exact and inexact inference. The example dialogues that are used for learning the structure of the probabilistic logic program are parsed into dependency structures and then further translated into the Event Calculus notation with the help of a simple ontology. The novelty of our approach is that we can not only process uncertainty in event recognition but also learn the structure of effect axioms and combine these two sources of uncertainty to successfully answer queries under this probabilistic setting. Interestingly, our extension of the logic-based version of the SEC is completely elaboration-tolerant in the sense that the probabilistic version fully includes the logic-based version. This makes it possible to use the probabilistic version of the SEC in the traditional way as well as when we have to deal with uncertainty in the observed world. In the future, we would like to extend the probabilistic version of the SEC to deal -- among other things -- with concurrent actions and continuous change.","PeriodicalId":271041,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Logic Programming","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Logic Programming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ICLP.2017.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we showed how we can automatically learn the structure and parameters of probabilistic effect axioms for the Simple Event Calculus (SEC) from positive and negative example interpretations stated as short dialogue sequences in natural language. We used the cplint framework for this task that provides libraries for structure and parameter learning and for answering queries with exact and inexact inference. The example dialogues that are used for learning the structure of the probabilistic logic program are parsed into dependency structures and then further translated into the Event Calculus notation with the help of a simple ontology. The novelty of our approach is that we can not only process uncertainty in event recognition but also learn the structure of effect axioms and combine these two sources of uncertainty to successfully answer queries under this probabilistic setting. Interestingly, our extension of the logic-based version of the SEC is completely elaboration-tolerant in the sense that the probabilistic version fully includes the logic-based version. This makes it possible to use the probabilistic version of the SEC in the traditional way as well as when we have to deal with uncertainty in the observed world. In the future, we would like to extend the probabilistic version of the SEC to deal -- among other things -- with concurrent actions and continuous change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过概率逻辑规划学习效果公理
在本文中,我们展示了如何从自然语言中的短对话序列的正反例解释中自动学习简单事件演算(SEC)的概率效应公理的结构和参数。我们在这项任务中使用了cplint框架,它提供了用于结构和参数学习的库,并用于回答具有精确和不精确推理的查询。用于学习概率逻辑程序结构的示例对话被解析为依赖关系结构,然后在简单本体的帮助下进一步转换为事件演算符号。该方法的新颖之处在于,我们不仅可以处理事件识别中的不确定性,还可以学习效果公理的结构,并将这两种不确定性来源结合起来,在这种概率设置下成功地回答查询。有趣的是,我们对基于逻辑的SEC版本的扩展是完全容忍详细阐述的,因为概率版本完全包括基于逻辑的版本。这使得以传统方式使用概率版本的SEC以及当我们必须处理观察世界中的不确定性时成为可能。在未来,我们希望扩展SEC的概率版本,以处理并发行动和持续变化等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Explaining Actual Causation via Reasoning About Actions and Change Speeding up Lazy-Grounding Answer Set Solving Improving Candidate Quality of Probabilistic Logic Models Epistemic Logic Programs with World View Constraints Learning Commonsense Knowledge Through Interactive Dialogue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1