{"title":"CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR IN GERMAN SCIENTIFIC AND POPULAR SCIENCE DISCOURSE: ANALYSIS OF USAGE AND FUNCTIONS","authors":"E. S. Stepanov","doi":"10.15593/2224-9389/2021.3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article examines peculiarities of realization and functioning of conceptual metaphor in scientific and popular science discourse based on the material of German. A case study of metaphor KÖRPER IST MECHANISMUS (“Body is a mechanism”) dwells on establishing of a correlation between function of conceptual metaphor and the discourse it is used in. The relevance of the research is based on the interest in the study of the connection between thinking and language und the role of the metaphor in the process of categorization, conceptualization and structuring of new knowledge. Metaphor enables to explain one fact through another by the means of analogy or similarity and acts as an in-strument to perception of complex abstract phenomena and processes. Novelty of the approach results in comparative character of analysis of functions that are peculiar to metaphor in stringent scientific and in derivate popular science discourse. In the course of the study, it has been discovered that metaphors in scientific texts serve the purpose of creating new concrete meaning by the means of understanding one conceptual field through the other, while metaphors in popular science texts are used to explain complex propositions by the means of already known to recipient. Conceptual metaphor is thus an in-strument of nomination and serve the heuristic function in scientific discourse. On the other hand, it possesses of more expressivity and fulfills the didactic function in popular science discourse. The ob-tained results make contribution to the theoretical cognitive linguistics and can be used to study metaphor in other types of discourse. The research perspectives include contrastive analysis of functions of conceptual metaphor in German and other European languages.","PeriodicalId":170306,"journal":{"name":"PNRPU Linguistics and Pedagogy Bulletin","volume":"125 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNRPU Linguistics and Pedagogy Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9389/2021.3.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present article examines peculiarities of realization and functioning of conceptual metaphor in scientific and popular science discourse based on the material of German. A case study of metaphor KÖRPER IST MECHANISMUS (“Body is a mechanism”) dwells on establishing of a correlation between function of conceptual metaphor and the discourse it is used in. The relevance of the research is based on the interest in the study of the connection between thinking and language und the role of the metaphor in the process of categorization, conceptualization and structuring of new knowledge. Metaphor enables to explain one fact through another by the means of analogy or similarity and acts as an in-strument to perception of complex abstract phenomena and processes. Novelty of the approach results in comparative character of analysis of functions that are peculiar to metaphor in stringent scientific and in derivate popular science discourse. In the course of the study, it has been discovered that metaphors in scientific texts serve the purpose of creating new concrete meaning by the means of understanding one conceptual field through the other, while metaphors in popular science texts are used to explain complex propositions by the means of already known to recipient. Conceptual metaphor is thus an in-strument of nomination and serve the heuristic function in scientific discourse. On the other hand, it possesses of more expressivity and fulfills the didactic function in popular science discourse. The ob-tained results make contribution to the theoretical cognitive linguistics and can be used to study metaphor in other types of discourse. The research perspectives include contrastive analysis of functions of conceptual metaphor in German and other European languages.
本文以德语为基础,考察了概念隐喻在科学和科普话语中的实现和功能特点。以隐喻为例KÖRPER IST MECHANISMUS(“身体是一种机制”)探讨了概念隐喻的功能与话语之间的关系。该研究的相关性是基于对思维与语言之间的联系以及隐喻在新知识的分类、概念化和结构过程中的作用的研究兴趣。隐喻可以通过类比或相似的方式来解释一个事实,并作为感知复杂抽象现象和过程的工具。这种方法的新颖性导致了隐喻在严格科学和衍生科普话语中所特有的功能分析的对比性。在研究过程中,我们发现科学语篇中的隐喻是通过理解一个概念领域来创造新的具体意义,而科普语篇中的隐喻则是通过接受者已知的方式来解释复杂的命题。因此,概念隐喻是一种提名法,在科学语篇中起着启发式的作用。另一方面,它在科普话语中具有更强的表达能力和教学功能。本文的研究成果对认知语言学的理论发展有一定的贡献,也可用于其他语篇隐喻的研究。研究视角包括德语和其他欧洲语言概念隐喻功能的对比分析。