J.E. Clague, P. Fields, D.R. Graham, P.D.O. Davies
{"title":"Screening for tuberculosis: current practices and attitudes of hospital workers","authors":"J.E. Clague, P. Fields, D.R. Graham, P.D.O. Davies","doi":"10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To examine the current practices and attitudes of health workers to the prevention of tuberculosis in our 55-bed chest unit, we investigated the tuberculin reactor status, reviewed pre-employment screening and reviewed the action taken after contact with tuberculosis by staff members. We assessed all 61 staff members, including 44 nurses, 1 physiotherapist, 11 doctors and 5 domestic workers. <span><math><mtext>47</mtext><mtext>61</mtext></math></span> staff members had had BCG vaccination. Heaf testing revealed 3 Heaf-negative subjects and, of the remainder, 52 had grade 3 or stronger reactions. Only <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>11</mtext></math></span> doctors, <span><math><mtext>36</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>4</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had any pre-employment screening. No action was taken by any doctor after their last contact with tuberculosis, whereas <span><math><mtext>10</mtext><mtext>44</mtext></math></span> nurses and <span><math><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>5</mtext></math></span> domestic workers had had chest X-rays. This study shows the low importance with which the risk of tuberculosis is perceived, particularly by doctors and demonstrates the need for stricter supervision and improved quality of pre-employment screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23472,"journal":{"name":"Tubercle","volume":"72 4","pages":"Pages 265-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0041-3879(91)90052-T","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tubercle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004138799190052T","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
To examine the current practices and attitudes of health workers to the prevention of tuberculosis in our 55-bed chest unit, we investigated the tuberculin reactor status, reviewed pre-employment screening and reviewed the action taken after contact with tuberculosis by staff members. We assessed all 61 staff members, including 44 nurses, 1 physiotherapist, 11 doctors and 5 domestic workers. staff members had had BCG vaccination. Heaf testing revealed 3 Heaf-negative subjects and, of the remainder, 52 had grade 3 or stronger reactions. Only doctors, nurses and domestic workers had had any pre-employment screening. No action was taken by any doctor after their last contact with tuberculosis, whereas nurses and domestic workers had had chest X-rays. This study shows the low importance with which the risk of tuberculosis is perceived, particularly by doctors and demonstrates the need for stricter supervision and improved quality of pre-employment screening.