The assessment of learning infrastructure (ALI): the theory, practice, and scalability of automated assessment

Korinn S. Ostrow, Douglas Selent, Yan Wang, E. V. Inwegen, N. Heffernan, J. Williams
{"title":"The assessment of learning infrastructure (ALI): the theory, practice, and scalability of automated assessment","authors":"Korinn S. Ostrow, Douglas Selent, Yan Wang, E. V. Inwegen, N. Heffernan, J. Williams","doi":"10.1145/2883851.2883872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers invested in K-12 education struggle not just to enhance pedagogy, curriculum, and student engagement, but also to harness the power of technology in ways that will optimize learning. Online learning platforms offer a powerful environment for educational research at scale. The present work details the creation of an automated system designed to provide researchers with insights regarding data logged from randomized controlled experiments conducted within the ASSISTments TestBed. The Assessment of Learning Infrastructure (ALI) builds upon existing technologies to foster a symbiotic relationship beneficial to students, researchers, the platform and its content, and the learning analytics community. ALI is a sophisticated automated reporting system that provides an overview of sample distributions and basic analyses for researchers to consider when assessing their data. ALI's benefits can also be felt at scale through analyses that crosscut multiple studies to drive iterative platform improvements while promoting personalized learning.","PeriodicalId":343844,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Researchers invested in K-12 education struggle not just to enhance pedagogy, curriculum, and student engagement, but also to harness the power of technology in ways that will optimize learning. Online learning platforms offer a powerful environment for educational research at scale. The present work details the creation of an automated system designed to provide researchers with insights regarding data logged from randomized controlled experiments conducted within the ASSISTments TestBed. The Assessment of Learning Infrastructure (ALI) builds upon existing technologies to foster a symbiotic relationship beneficial to students, researchers, the platform and its content, and the learning analytics community. ALI is a sophisticated automated reporting system that provides an overview of sample distributions and basic analyses for researchers to consider when assessing their data. ALI's benefits can also be felt at scale through analyses that crosscut multiple studies to drive iterative platform improvements while promoting personalized learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习基础设施(ALI)的评估:自动化评估的理论、实践和可扩展性
投资于K-12教育的研究人员不仅要努力提高教学法、课程和学生的参与度,还要利用技术的力量优化学习。在线学习平台为大规模教育研究提供了一个强大的环境。目前的工作详细介绍了一个自动化系统的创建,该系统旨在为研究人员提供有关在ASSISTments测试台上进行的随机对照实验记录的数据的见解。学习基础设施评估(ALI)建立在现有技术的基础上,以促进对学生、研究人员、平台及其内容以及学习分析社区有益的共生关系。ALI是一个复杂的自动报告系统,它提供了样本分布和基本分析的概述,供研究人员在评估数据时考虑。通过横切多个研究的分析,在促进个性化学习的同时,推动迭代平台的改进,也可以在规模上感受到ALI的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Topic modeling for evaluating students' reflective writing: a case study of pre-service teachers' journals Learning through goal setting Reflecting on reflective writing analytics: assessment challenges and iterative evaluation of a prototype tool Evaluation of an adaptive practice system for learning geography facts Student perspectives on data provision and use: starting to unpack disciplinary differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1