Quality Guidelines for Research Artifacts in Model-Driven Engineering

C. Damasceno, D. Strüber
{"title":"Quality Guidelines for Research Artifacts in Model-Driven Engineering","authors":"C. Damasceno, D. Strüber","doi":"10.1109/MODELS50736.2021.00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sharing research artifacts is known to help people to build upon existing knowledge, adopt novel contributions in practice, and increase the chances of papers receiving attention. In Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), openly providing research artifacts plays a key role, even more so as the community targets a broader use of AI techniques, which can only become feasible if large open datasets and confidence measures for their quality are available. However, the current lack of common discipline-specific guidelines for research data sharing opens the opportunity for misunderstandings about the true potential of research artifacts and subjective expectations regarding artifact quality. To address this issue, we introduce a set of guidelines for artifact sharing specifically tailored to MDE research. To design this guidelines set, we systematically analyzed general-purpose artifact sharing practices of major computer science venues and tailored them to the MDE domain. Subsequently, we conducted an online survey with 90 researchers and practitioners with expertise in MDE. We investigated our participants’ experiences in developing and sharing artifacts in MDE research and the challenges encountered while doing so. We then asked them to prioritize each of our guidelines as essential, desirable, or unnecessary. Finally, we asked them to evaluate our guidelines with respect to clarity, completeness, and relevance. In each of these dimensions, our guidelines were assessed positively by more than 92% of the participants. To foster the reproducibility and reusability of our results, we make the full set of generated artifacts available in an open repository at https://mdeartifacts.github.io/.","PeriodicalId":375828,"journal":{"name":"2021 ACM/IEEE 24th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 ACM/IEEE 24th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MODELS50736.2021.00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Sharing research artifacts is known to help people to build upon existing knowledge, adopt novel contributions in practice, and increase the chances of papers receiving attention. In Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), openly providing research artifacts plays a key role, even more so as the community targets a broader use of AI techniques, which can only become feasible if large open datasets and confidence measures for their quality are available. However, the current lack of common discipline-specific guidelines for research data sharing opens the opportunity for misunderstandings about the true potential of research artifacts and subjective expectations regarding artifact quality. To address this issue, we introduce a set of guidelines for artifact sharing specifically tailored to MDE research. To design this guidelines set, we systematically analyzed general-purpose artifact sharing practices of major computer science venues and tailored them to the MDE domain. Subsequently, we conducted an online survey with 90 researchers and practitioners with expertise in MDE. We investigated our participants’ experiences in developing and sharing artifacts in MDE research and the challenges encountered while doing so. We then asked them to prioritize each of our guidelines as essential, desirable, or unnecessary. Finally, we asked them to evaluate our guidelines with respect to clarity, completeness, and relevance. In each of these dimensions, our guidelines were assessed positively by more than 92% of the participants. To foster the reproducibility and reusability of our results, we make the full set of generated artifacts available in an open repository at https://mdeartifacts.github.io/.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模型驱动工程中研究工件的质量指南
众所周知,共享研究成果可以帮助人们建立在现有知识的基础上,在实践中采用新的贡献,并增加论文获得关注的机会。在模型驱动工程(MDE)中,公开提供研究工件起着关键作用,甚至更重要的是,社区的目标是更广泛地使用人工智能技术,这只有在大型开放数据集和对其质量的信心措施可用的情况下才能变得可行。然而,目前缺乏研究数据共享的共同学科特定指导方针,这为误解研究工件的真正潜力和对工件质量的主观期望提供了机会。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了一组专门为MDE研究量身定制的工件共享指南。为了设计这个指导方针集,我们系统地分析了主要计算机科学场所的通用工件共享实践,并将它们定制为MDE领域。随后,我们对90名具有MDE专业知识的研究人员和从业人员进行了在线调查。我们调查了参与者在开发和共享MDE研究中的工件方面的经验,以及在这样做时遇到的挑战。然后,我们要求他们将我们的每个指导方针按必要、可取或不必要的顺序排列。最后,我们要求他们评估我们的指导方针的清晰度、完整性和相关性。在这些维度中,我们的指导方针得到了超过92%的参与者的积极评价。为了促进结果的再现性和可重用性,我们在https://mdeartifacts.github.io/的开放存储库中提供了生成的工件的完整集合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Model-Driven Simulation-Based Analysis for Multi-Robot Systems MoDALAS: Model-Driven Assurance for Learning-Enabled Autonomous Systems [Title page] Monte Carlo Tree Search and GR(1) Synthesis for Robot Tasks Planning in Automotive Production Lines Automated Patch Generation for Fixing Semantic Errors in ATL Transformation Rules
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1