Structure Permitting EU Airlines to Attract Non-EU Capital with the Investor's Interest Exceeding 50%

Ivars Mekons
{"title":"Structure Permitting EU Airlines to Attract Non-EU Capital with the Investor's Interest Exceeding 50%","authors":"Ivars Mekons","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3132981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current legal regime binding to EU airlines requires that the companies are continuously majority owned and controlled by EU nationals (natural or legal persons) or EU Member States; see EU Regulation No 1008/2008 of September 24, 2008; Art.4(f). In practice, noting the scarcity of any EU originating financing (that would be willing to accept the level of speculation and uncertainty inherent in the current EU aviation environment), the EU airlines obviously seek financing sources outside of EU. At the same time, the investors see prudence in demanding more efficient safeguard than the formally permissible \"50%-1\" share, on grounds of concern that their financing can be gulped up by the majority owners without consideration of investor's interests at their best. Accommodation of the investor's financial safety quest with mandatory EU legal provisions implies invocation of novel modes of cooperation. The following paper puts forward one such novel structure. The idea is to create a \"virtual equity majority\" for the Investor in the existing Airline's newly created spin-off units, the latter units being mutually bonded through 100% cross-shareholdings. EU aviation industry players are invited to consider the model for their operations with regard to terms and conditions of prospective non-EU investor engagements.","PeriodicalId":365224,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3132981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current legal regime binding to EU airlines requires that the companies are continuously majority owned and controlled by EU nationals (natural or legal persons) or EU Member States; see EU Regulation No 1008/2008 of September 24, 2008; Art.4(f). In practice, noting the scarcity of any EU originating financing (that would be willing to accept the level of speculation and uncertainty inherent in the current EU aviation environment), the EU airlines obviously seek financing sources outside of EU. At the same time, the investors see prudence in demanding more efficient safeguard than the formally permissible "50%-1" share, on grounds of concern that their financing can be gulped up by the majority owners without consideration of investor's interests at their best. Accommodation of the investor's financial safety quest with mandatory EU legal provisions implies invocation of novel modes of cooperation. The following paper puts forward one such novel structure. The idea is to create a "virtual equity majority" for the Investor in the existing Airline's newly created spin-off units, the latter units being mutually bonded through 100% cross-shareholdings. EU aviation industry players are invited to consider the model for their operations with regard to terms and conditions of prospective non-EU investor engagements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
允许欧盟航空公司吸引非欧盟资本且投资者权益超过50%的结构
目前对欧盟航空公司有约束力的法律制度要求,公司必须由欧盟国民(自然人或法人)或欧盟成员国持续拥有和控制多数股权;见欧盟2008年9月24日第1008/2008号法规;Art.4 (f)。在实践中,注意到任何欧盟原始融资的稀缺性(愿意接受当前欧盟航空环境中固有的投机水平和不确定性),欧盟航空公司显然寻求欧盟以外的融资来源。与此同时,投资者认为,要求比正式允许的“50%-1”股份更有效的保障措施是谨慎的,因为他们担心,他们的资金可能会被多数股东吞噬,而不考虑投资者的最大利益。将投资者的金融安全要求与强制性的欧盟法律规定相适应,意味着需要新的合作模式。本文提出了这样一种新颖的结构。这个想法是为投资者在现有航空公司新创建的分拆单位中创造“虚拟多数股权”,后者通过100%的交叉持股相互结合。欧盟航空业的参与者被邀请考虑他们的业务模式,考虑到潜在的非欧盟投资者参与的条款和条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact and Application of the UNCITRAL Rules in Domestic Jurisdictions An Analysis and Assessment of China's Investment in Ghana. The (Ir)relevance of Transnational Public Policy in Investment Treaty Arbitration Foreign Investment Screening Beyond the COVID-19 Challenge: Overcoming the Emergency Capacity to Borrow and Sovereign Debt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1