Production Optimisation Under Uncertainty with Automated Scenario Reduction: A Real-Field Case Application

E. Barros, R. Fonseca, R. J. Moraes
{"title":"Production Optimisation Under Uncertainty with Automated Scenario Reduction: A Real-Field Case Application","authors":"E. Barros, R. Fonseca, R. J. Moraes","doi":"10.2118/196637-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this work we discuss the successful application of our previously developed automated scenario reduction approach applied to life-cycle optimization of a real field case. The inherent uncertainty present in the description of reservoir properties motivates the use of an ensemble of model scenarios to achieve an optimized robust reservoir development strategy. In order to accurately span the range of uncertainties it is imperative to build a relatively large ensemble of model scenarios. The size of the ensemble is directly proportional to the computational effort required in robust optimization. For high-dimensional, complex field case models this implies that a large ensemble of model scenarios which albeit accurately captures the inherent uncertainties would be computationally infeasible to be utilized for robust optimization. One of the ways to circumvent this problem is to work with a reduced subset of model scenarios. Methods based on heuristics and ad-hoc rules exist to select this reduced subset. However, in most of the cases, the optimal number of model realizations must be known upfront. Excessively small number of realizations may result in a subset that does not always capture the span of uncertainties present, leading to sub-optimal optimization results. This raises the question on how to effectively select a subset that contains an optimal number of realizations which both is able to capture the uncertainties present and allow for a computationally efficient robust optimization. To answer this question we have developed an automated framework to select the reduced ensemble which has been applied to an original ensemble of 300 equiprobable model scenarios of a real field case. The methodology relies on the fact that, ideally, the distance between the cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of the objective function (OF) of the full and reduced ensembles should be minimal. This allows the method to determine the smallest subset of realizations that both spans the range of uncertainties and provides an OF CDF that is representative of the full ensemble based on a statistical metric. In this real field case application we optimize the injection rates throughout the assets life-cycle with expected cumulative oil production as the OF. The newly developed framework selected a small subset of 17 model scenarios out of the original ensemble which was used for robust optimization. The optimal injection strategy achieved an average increase of 6% in cumulative oil production with a significant reduction, approximately 90%, in the computational effort. Validation of this optimal strategy over the original ensemble lead to very similar improvements in cumulative oil production, highlighting the reliability and accuracy of our framework.","PeriodicalId":354509,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, September 19, 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, September 19, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196637-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this work we discuss the successful application of our previously developed automated scenario reduction approach applied to life-cycle optimization of a real field case. The inherent uncertainty present in the description of reservoir properties motivates the use of an ensemble of model scenarios to achieve an optimized robust reservoir development strategy. In order to accurately span the range of uncertainties it is imperative to build a relatively large ensemble of model scenarios. The size of the ensemble is directly proportional to the computational effort required in robust optimization. For high-dimensional, complex field case models this implies that a large ensemble of model scenarios which albeit accurately captures the inherent uncertainties would be computationally infeasible to be utilized for robust optimization. One of the ways to circumvent this problem is to work with a reduced subset of model scenarios. Methods based on heuristics and ad-hoc rules exist to select this reduced subset. However, in most of the cases, the optimal number of model realizations must be known upfront. Excessively small number of realizations may result in a subset that does not always capture the span of uncertainties present, leading to sub-optimal optimization results. This raises the question on how to effectively select a subset that contains an optimal number of realizations which both is able to capture the uncertainties present and allow for a computationally efficient robust optimization. To answer this question we have developed an automated framework to select the reduced ensemble which has been applied to an original ensemble of 300 equiprobable model scenarios of a real field case. The methodology relies on the fact that, ideally, the distance between the cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of the objective function (OF) of the full and reduced ensembles should be minimal. This allows the method to determine the smallest subset of realizations that both spans the range of uncertainties and provides an OF CDF that is representative of the full ensemble based on a statistical metric. In this real field case application we optimize the injection rates throughout the assets life-cycle with expected cumulative oil production as the OF. The newly developed framework selected a small subset of 17 model scenarios out of the original ensemble which was used for robust optimization. The optimal injection strategy achieved an average increase of 6% in cumulative oil production with a significant reduction, approximately 90%, in the computational effort. Validation of this optimal strategy over the original ensemble lead to very similar improvements in cumulative oil production, highlighting the reliability and accuracy of our framework.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不确定条件下的自动化情景缩减生产优化:一个实际案例应用
在这项工作中,我们讨论了我们之前开发的自动化场景简化方法在实际现场案例的生命周期优化中的成功应用。油藏性质描述中固有的不确定性促使使用模型情景集合来实现优化的稳健油藏开发策略。为了准确地跨越不确定性的范围,必须建立一个相对较大的模型情景集合。集成的大小与鲁棒优化所需的计算量成正比。对于高维的、复杂的现场情况模型,这意味着一个大的模型情景集合,尽管准确地捕获了固有的不确定性,但在计算上是不可行的,无法用于鲁棒优化。规避这个问题的方法之一是使用减少的模型场景子集。存在基于启发式和特别规则的方法来选择此简化子集。然而,在大多数情况下,必须预先知道模型实现的最佳数量。数量过少的实现可能导致子集不能总是捕获存在的不确定性范围,从而导致次优优化结果。这就提出了一个问题,即如何有效地选择一个子集,该子集包含最优数量的实现,既能够捕获存在的不确定性,又允许计算效率高的鲁棒优化。为了回答这个问题,我们开发了一个自动框架来选择简化的集成,并将其应用于一个真实现场案例的300个等概率模型场景的原始集成。该方法依赖于这样一个事实,即理想情况下,目标函数(of)的累积分布函数(CDF)之间的距离应该是最小的。这允许该方法确定实现的最小子集,这些实现既跨越了不确定性的范围,又提供了基于统计度量的代表完整集合的CDF。在实际的油田应用中,我们以预期的累积产油量为指标,优化了整个资产生命周期的注入速率。新开发的框架从原始集成中选择了17个模型场景的一小部分,用于鲁棒优化。最优的注入策略使累计产油量平均增加6%,而计算量却显著减少了约90%。通过对原始集成的验证,该最优策略在累积产油量方面取得了非常相似的改善,突出了我们的框架的可靠性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Middle East Karst Carbonate: An Integrated Workflow For Prediction Of Karst Enhancement Distribution Potential Applicability of Miscible N2 Flooding in High-Temperature Abu Dhabi Reservoir Modelling Dispersed Chemical Droplets Injection in the Gas Stream for EOR Applications A Collaborative Approach to Risk Assessment and Mitigation of Pre-Production Cross-Flow for a Multi-Billion Dollar Sour Field Development Project in the Sultanate of Oman: A Case Study Multidisciplinary Approach for Unconventional Reservoirs Characterisation by Integrating Wireline Openhole Logging Techniques – Electric and Sonic to Formation Testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1